Asymptomatic transmission lie of COVID, inferior innate & natural immunity, equal risk of severe outcome if expose regardless of age & baseline risk lie, overcycled PCR 'process', recurrent infection
pre-omicron etc., & many more FAKE COVID PANDEMIC lies, yet let me ask, if we give a pass to some, don't we for credibility also give a pass to Fauci, Collins? Tell me for my brain is exploding
Is amnesty (which under no condition will I agree to) only for people we ‘like’? this is the issue. Why not give Malone a pass too? His mRNA technology with Weissman and Kariko et al. caused death…What about Bourla, his vaccine….why not praise him?…for his Pfizer death shot based on fraud research studies etc…
how do we decide who we avert our gaze from as to COVID wrongs and those we go after???
How to decide?
Easy.
If a person was conned, well, they were conned. Pity them. But if they committed fraud, and if they proceeded with malice aforethought, that's different-- those are crimes.
Saying to a patient or an employee, "I recommend that you get vaccinated"-- that's not a crime if -- IF-- you yourself were conned. But even if you were conned, telling someone that "you have to take this injection or I will fire you / give you a dishonorable discharge / make you go on leave without pay / wear a mask / segregate and shame you-- that is a crime. It is a crime because it violates another person's human rights. Right there, there are a lot of people who need to be held accountable before the law, and victims who to need to be made whole again.
Fraud is fraud. That's not rocket science to identify. Knowing that the jabs were killing and injuring people, saying nothing, trying to hide it and then telling the public that the jabs are "safe and effective," that is fraud and malice aforethought.
As for people having said stupid things (Arnold Schwarzenegger, I'm talking about you, and I'm also thinking about a good number of my own friends and relatives), well, if we want free speech, by definition that means we have to put up with other people believing and saying things we don't like or even find despicable. So I defend citizen Schwarzenegger's right to say what he infamously said: "f**k your freedom." That's what freedom looks like. Yeah, it's kinda kerazy ironic. Fortunately, our founding fathers grokked it. Freedom of expression is at the top of the US Constitution's Bill of Rights.
So, in sum, it's one thing to heap scorn on people who, having glugged the Kool-Aid, said offensive things and did such rude and cruel things as disinviting people to their weddings and Thanksgiving, etc. (I do heap scorn on them, if I bother to think of them at all), and it is another, very different thing to prosecute those who have committed crimes. And I say everyday: May those who have committed crimes be held accountable before the law.
ZERO amnesty!