Be warned: U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) researchers are now preparing to publish a study on data that identified four potential issues in elderly persons after COVID-19 vaccination. Stieber
We stand by for the first question when we see the publication is, why now? When did you know the data? Show us the data that made you FDA think the vaccine was safe for we have seen NONE!
In 2021, the FDA said the four potential adverse events of interest were detected by analyzing the health care claims database for Medicare, the government insurance plan that covers people aged 65 and older.
The events were blood clotting in the lungs, insufficient oxygen to the heart, low blood platelet levels, and disseminated intravascular coagulation.
“These four events may not be true safety concerns, and the screening method cannot establish that the vaccine caused these AEI. FDA is sharing the initial findings of this safety study in the spirit of transparency but does not believe there is a cause for concern. There are alternative explanations for the findings, including the fact that the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine was given to many high-risk individuals who were old
Here's what I don't get: after 2 years of complaining about how correlation is not causality, they're publishing adverse event data and acknowledging, again, that correlation is not causality. So if this was the reason, all along, to not publish any data or worry about any safety signals, why is it NOW acceptable? Which makes me believe there's another shoe that's going to drop. FDA, CDC, NIH must know something is coming--perhaps it has to do with the midterms.
They will (long after the dust has settled) claim they flagged such so they are not guilty of hiding adverse data.
The Daily Telegraph in the UK as an example ran ONE short article on the Dutch Farmer protests, I suspect for exactly the same reason ie they can say they covered it.
There is much being very quietly rewritten at present.
Many of us will never forget but suspect most will forget.