Did Buchan et al.'s Ontario study support Hansen's Danish study that the mRNA technology based Pfizer & Moderna injections damaged the immune system with rapid negative effectiveness? Yes!
If this data and evidence was accumulating rapidly, why did Fauci, Walensky, Francis Collins, Jha, HHS, CDC, FDA, NIH officials, PHAC, Health Canada (Njoo, Tam), SAGE etc. continue to mandate shots?
SOURCE:
What do the graphs show as to negative effectiveness?
I think the answer is (1) "credo in vaccina, omnipotentem sanctum potionem" and (2) money for many including, let's not forget, the shareholders of Acuitas
Relatedly:
Unveiling the Risks: Dr. Chris Shoemaker Exposes the Dangers of the COVID Vaccine | Ottawa Day Three | NCI National Citizens Inquiry CA [Canada]
Sworn testimony, May 19, 2023. Posted on rumble May 20, 2023.
https://rumble.com/v2oxmfc-dr-chris-shoemaker-discusses-the-vaccines-and-their-safety-and-efficacy-ott.html
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:
*Dr. Chris Shoemaker's website is https://drshoemakercovidtruth.com
More about Dr. Shoemaker at: https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/multimedia/dr-chris-shoemaker/
*Shawn Buckley is a Canadian constitutional lawyer and health freedom activist who drafted The Charter of Health Freedom. See http://www.charterofhealthfreedom.org
*The NCI website is https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/
TRANSCRIPT - BRIEF EXCERPT
SHAWN BUCKLEY: And I want you to comment on those and and what happened to the animals that were tested because I think people need to understand what they knew before they rolled out this program.
DR. CHRIS SHOEMAKER: And can I just ask, is the microphone adequate for the room? It's OK? Alright.
36:19
Lipid nanoparticles. LNPs. RNA or DNA cannot move from place to place unless its got a little vehicle to travel in. And this vehicle was invented by a Canadian company. The company was Acuitas* out of British Columbia. And neither Pfizer, Moderna, nor the US Department of Defense would have been able to use any of these carriers, lipid nanoparticles, or plasmids, which is another version of it, they would not have been able to use either of them to carry RNA or DNA into the human body unless they paid a royalty to Acuitas.
Acuitas has been paid. Acuitas continues to get paid, it gets lots and lots and and lots and billions and billions of dollars for their intellectual property.
Sadly, when these lipid nanoparticles were tested for danger and for safety, with no RNA in it, with no DNA in it, just to see, well what does it really do to animals? Can it be used liberally? All the animals died. All the animals. They're a lot smaller than humans. But they died. 100% because the LNPs would go into brains, it would go into their hearts, it would go into their kidneys, it would go into their ovaries. Within a few days every animal given LNPs was deceased.
Therefore we are using a carrier that is known to be lethal on some level, and we're using it without certainly without having proved its true safety in humans because we sure as heck didn't prove it's safety in animals. And it doesn't matter the names attached to the invention of this. The fact is that the science, and Dr. Roger Hodkinson** showed it, Dr. Roger Hodkinson has told us about the 100-fold elevation of density in the ovaries compared to the body in general. These lipid nanoparticles are good at crossing two or three barriers in particular. They go across the ovary barrier and the testes barrier into the reproductive system massively. And they go across the brain barrier into all structures of the brain massively.
Do they go anywhere else with some degree? Well of course they do, we have a blood system and the blood system can take these lipid nanoparticles to heart and to liver and to other areas of the body of course. But the highest density, the three places, are genetic productive system of ovaries and testicles and our brain cognitive system. And that's what LNPs do. So they are toxic to those areas, even with nothing in them, and they sure as heck are toxic when they're carrying spike, or the mRNA, DNA to create spike.
39:19
SHAWN BUCKLEY: And I'll just ask because we've got 6 minutes left. If you want to switch to, there was something you wanted to make sure was covered.
DR. CHRIS SHOEMAKER: Oh, thank you, yes. It's on this general topic we're into, as it were, right now. Um, just give me a moment to collect my thoughts because we've had quite a different presentation than we originally thought. Um, yeah. So.
How could it go well? Lies after lies with people not taking direction from the people who in a true chain of command should have had control over them.
END OF BRIEF EXCERPT
#Â Â Â #Â Â Â #
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:
*Acuitas Therapeutics. See https://acuitastx.com/
** Dr. Roger Hodkinson's webpage is https://medmaldoctors.ca/dr-roger-hodkinson/
See also:
A Moratorium on mRNA 'Vaccines' is Needed: Re-Visiting the Biodistribution of Lipid Nanoparticles
by Dr. Byram W. Bridle, April 22, 2022
https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p/a-moratorium-on-mrna-vaccines-is
And see:
A Pfizer Document the FDA Tried to Hide Shows LNPs from COVID-19 Vaccine Travel Everywhere in the Body: It’s very bad to have LNP in the liver, ovaries, spleen, and more...
by Aaron Siri, May 23, 2023
https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/a-pfizer-document-the-fda-tried-to
Fauci, Walensky, Francis Collins, Jha, HHS, CDC, FDA, NIH officials, PHAC, Health Canada (Njoo, Tam), SAGE etc. continued to mandate shots because damaged immune systems and rapid negative effectiveness are good outcomes for Pharma Dr. Alexander. It sells more Pharma products. Pharma are not a charity. They're in the business to make money. That's why Pharma pays Fauci, Walensky, Francis Collins, Jha, HHS, CDC, FDA, NIH officials, PHAC, Health Canada (Njoo, Tam), SAGE etc the big dollars.