Did Shrestha et al. (Cleveland Clinic study) show that the more COVID boosters received, the higher the risk of subsequently contracting COVID? Yes! There was a clear dose response where the least
palexander.substack.com
Discover more from Alexander COVID News-Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's substack
COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2: natural immunity; innate immunity; vaccines and immune pressure; no vaccines for children; early outpatient treatment; lockdowns; school closures and mask mandates and vaccine mandates and emergency powers and truck convoy
Over 38,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Did Shrestha et al. (Cleveland Clinic study) show that the more COVID boosters received, the higher the risk of subsequently contracting COVID? Yes! There was a clear dose response where the least
risk of infection was in those who got no shots (zero)
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v5
‘Among 51017 working-aged Cleveland Clinic employees, the bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% effective in preventing infection while the BA.4/5 lineages were dominant, and 20% effective while the BQ lineages were. Effectiveness was not demonstrated when the XBB lineages were dominant.’
Did Shrestha et al. (Cleveland Clinic study) show that the more COVID boosters received, the higher the risk of subsequently contracting COVID? Yes! There was a clear dose response where the least
This would appear to be a definitive indictment of covid shots. "Effective" they are not.
"Safety" has already been revealed as a conspiratorial lie.
It's as obvious as the nose on your face that the unvaxed are not getting sick, dying suddenly. And the unvaxed who do die of other causes: Their corpses are not full of amyloid-like clots.