Dr. Paul Elias Alexander, The UNITY Project, "They're still coming after your kids: Dr. Paul Alexander speaks against covid vaccines in children", Albany, New York, May 16th 2022
palexander.substack.com
Dr. Paul Elias Alexander, The UNITY Project, "They're still coming after your kids: Dr. Paul Alexander speaks against covid vaccines in children", Albany, New York, May 16th 2022
Dr. Paul Elias Alexander, The UNITY Project, "They're still coming after your kids: Dr. Paul Alexander speaks against covid vaccines in children", Albany, New York, May 16th 2022
They sure as hell are. Pull out...pull your kids out NOW before it’s too late! Find other means to teach your children before they are brainwashed and jabbed. Before it’s too late! 💔
You may choose to look the other way but you can never say again that you did not know.” ~ William Wilberforce
Paul. I truly appreciate your efforts... but may I suggest a rethink in your rhetoric?
I think it's more appropriate and potentially more effective to characterize FDA as refusing to protect children from experimental vaccines and experimental vaccination.
These are EUA-based, essentially provisional and untested.
FDA has a duty. Experimentation on children is very difficult to defend. Mass experimentation on children is impossible to defend.
Promiscuous use of experimental vaccines in general represents a reckless, extreme and unconscionable policy.
FDA has an unshakable bedrock duty to test and secure the human safety and efficacy of every drug and vaccine released to the public commons for common, ordinary use.
This duty has primacy. This duty is a First Principle. These are not swept away by issuing provisional EUA status to otherwise substandard technology released for mass experimental use in human adults or their children. FDA leadership has FAILED this duty of care.
The subject technology is substandard. If it was not, it would be standard; it would be subject to standard process and complete and meet the requirements of the standard process. It would be registered and approved in the standard way that all other licensed drugs and vaccines now in use have been licensed. This is not the case with the EUA vaccines, or the derivative products that remain incompletely tested via unprecedented exemption and bureaucratic fiat inconsistent with the First Principles set forth in the enabling statutes controlling the regulatory dominion of FDA and its leadership.
FACT: FDA is behaving in a capricious and arbitrary manner because they have failed their fundamental and overarching statutory duty to test and secure the human safety and efficacy of these experimental vaccine they are allowing to be released into the public commons for common, ordinary use.
This is such a profound and portentous breach of statutory and regulatory First Principles the subject employees responsible their superiors may have committed a justiciable act of maladministration that reasonably opens them up to personal liability for their actions arising from the said maladministration.
Qualified immunity only goes so far. One cannot trample the Common Rule with impunity.
We are in unprecedented territory. Their professional duty appears to have been unconscionably breached. They intend to hide behind process.
Let them try. Process is subordinate to First Principles, not the other way round.
They sure as hell are. Pull out...pull your kids out NOW before it’s too late! Find other means to teach your children before they are brainwashed and jabbed. Before it’s too late! 💔
You may choose to look the other way but you can never say again that you did not know.” ~ William Wilberforce
Paul. I truly appreciate your efforts... but may I suggest a rethink in your rhetoric?
I think it's more appropriate and potentially more effective to characterize FDA as refusing to protect children from experimental vaccines and experimental vaccination.
These are EUA-based, essentially provisional and untested.
FDA has a duty. Experimentation on children is very difficult to defend. Mass experimentation on children is impossible to defend.
Promiscuous use of experimental vaccines in general represents a reckless, extreme and unconscionable policy.
FDA has an unshakable bedrock duty to test and secure the human safety and efficacy of every drug and vaccine released to the public commons for common, ordinary use.
This duty has primacy. This duty is a First Principle. These are not swept away by issuing provisional EUA status to otherwise substandard technology released for mass experimental use in human adults or their children. FDA leadership has FAILED this duty of care.
The subject technology is substandard. If it was not, it would be standard; it would be subject to standard process and complete and meet the requirements of the standard process. It would be registered and approved in the standard way that all other licensed drugs and vaccines now in use have been licensed. This is not the case with the EUA vaccines, or the derivative products that remain incompletely tested via unprecedented exemption and bureaucratic fiat inconsistent with the First Principles set forth in the enabling statutes controlling the regulatory dominion of FDA and its leadership.
FACT: FDA is behaving in a capricious and arbitrary manner because they have failed their fundamental and overarching statutory duty to test and secure the human safety and efficacy of these experimental vaccine they are allowing to be released into the public commons for common, ordinary use.
This is such a profound and portentous breach of statutory and regulatory First Principles the subject employees responsible their superiors may have committed a justiciable act of maladministration that reasonably opens them up to personal liability for their actions arising from the said maladministration.
Qualified immunity only goes so far. One cannot trample the Common Rule with impunity.
We are in unprecedented territory. Their professional duty appears to have been unconscionably breached. They intend to hide behind process.
Let them try. Process is subordinate to First Principles, not the other way round.
Nomenclature matters.