39 Comments
User's avatar
SimulationCommander's avatar

This was obvious right away. The announcement was like a week after the election, meaning it was obviously in the works before the election -- but the media was treating Trump's claim that the shot would be ready before the end of the year like a conspiracy theory.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

boom...he actually got a gift for this mRNA the way this has been done is pure disaster

Expand full comment
TJ's avatar

TRUE!

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

yes

Expand full comment
TJ's avatar

The TRACKING PRISON TRUMP IS PUTTING IN PLACE!

AGENDA 2030-50! New World Order!

Trump was NEVER LIED TO PERIOD!

TRUMP IS NOT OF GOD!

mRNAS ARE NOT OF GOD!

AI IS NOT OF GOD!

THIEVES ! LIARS & SNAKES!! I am reminded of the SNAKE POEM.

👎 FACT: After following the Date Trail... carefully crafted by Trump, his minions And the Communist Controlled US CONGRESS including the Satanic Black Robe Wearing scum have MURDERED MORE PEOPLE WORLD WIDE than any other WARS COMBINED etc. Let it sink in!

Trump Signed Executive ORDER Influenza Modernization ACT Sept 19 2019 by his buddy Bill Gates! NEVER REVOKED!

DAY ONE JAN 21, 2025

AI mRNA TARGETING CANCER given by WHO & WHAT? Prayers for the Population not a clue what's coming! 😭🙏

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

hhhmm

Expand full comment
Denise's avatar

Exactly. Gotta face the facts folks.

Expand full comment
Jean's avatar

"Trump Signed Executive ORDER Influenza Modernization ACT Sept 19 2019 by his buddy Bill Gates!"

Yes, and he also took millions from big pharma right after his election in 2020.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

Should You Still Recommend COVID-19 Vaccines? May 30, 2025

"When a pregnant person gets vaccinated, antibodies travel through the placenta and are passed to the fetus, protecting the newborn during the first critical months of life. That's important because babies from newborn to 6 months old (who are not yet eligible for vaccination) are among those most often hospitalized for severe COVID. COVID vaccination during pregnancy cuts hospitalization risk by 52%."

https://www.medscape.com/s/viewarticle/should-you-still-recommend-covid-19-vaccines-2025a1000ep3

Expand full comment
Kathleen Taylor's avatar

It's very troubling to read an article with quotes from such uninformed OB-GYNs. I have no doubt that's why you posted it. It's important to be aware of how captured by pharma the OB-GYN specialty is, including the current president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, who is quoted in the Medscape article.

A couple points come to mind:

As soon as a doctor uses the term "pregnant person," as each doctor quoted in this article does, I immediately downgrade my opinion of his competence.

I don't believe that pregnant women are at "greater risk of severe disease or complications from covid," as these covid jab-pushing doctors keep claiming.

I tend to believe that a pregnant woman's risks are more dependent upon her general health and co-morbidities, such as obesity, than the mere fact that she is pregnant - as pregnancy risks have always have been dependent upon the pre-existing health of the mother and her intrinsic susceptibility to disease.

That said, I believe the data is clear that she and her baby are more at risk from the covid jabs themselves, particularly since, at this point, there has been almost universal exposure to covid and herd immunity is already at work. Moreover, a pregnant woman is more at risk of dying from, or killing her baby from, agreeing to get a covid jab. Her future fertility is also at risk.

These recommendations are clearly irresponsible based upon widely available overwhelming reliable data the doctors quoted apparently refuse to consider.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

There's a very interesting looking substack on SIDS in Lioness of Judah substack. Unfortunately, I haven't had time to read it yet.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

Thank you for your thoughtful comments. You are correct about why I posted the article. I have the same reaction to the use of the term "pregnant person" as you do and found there was a lot of ideology in the article. I have always believed that it is highly undesirable to contract respiratory infections during pregnancy and am concerned about the long term effects of those

infections on the baby. The actual and potential effects of pharmacological substances on pregnant women and their offspring is also concerning.

I just came across this old article, at the link below, from 2022. It seems to contain a mix of fact and fiction. What do you make of it?

SARS-CoV-2 variants and pregnant Women: A cause for Concern?

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9212993/

Expand full comment
Kathleen Taylor's avatar

This is where I originally saw the strong data correlating infant vaccination with SIDS (Nicolas Hulscher)

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-vaccines-may-trigger-sudden

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

Thank you for sharing this.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

I was in endless meetings earlier in connection with the training I'm doing. Someone asked the presenter where she had got the dress she was wearing from. There were lots of compliments on the dress, although none from me.

Twice, she stated how she thought the dress made her look like "a pregnant person!" It did not enhance my impression of her competence!

Expand full comment
Kathleen Taylor's avatar

: ) This reminds me to tell you something later...

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

Hmm

Expand full comment
Kathleen Taylor's avatar

I'm very interested in taking a look at the NIH article you mention. Thank you for linking it. I am in the middle of writing a lengthy reply message to you : ) and am just taking a break for lunch!

I did read the article (in its original form?) strongly correlating SIDS deaths with infant vaccination timing, on a different site I believe (was it yesterday or the day before?). It is quite disturbing and should be impossible for the medical profession to ignore. Thank you for referencing it here. It is worth reading when you have the time, particularly if you know anyone expecting a baby.

Expand full comment
Jean's avatar

Here is some research for you on the devastation that occurs giving pregnant mothers and babies the jab.

"Analyst Sasha Latypova: 80 Percent Miscarriage Rate, vSafe"

https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/analyst-sasha-latypova-80-percent?publication_id=676930&post_id=165131527&isFreemail=true&r=s4aod&triedRedirect=true&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

It is astonishing at the disinformation put out by the MSM and government agencies trying to cover up their malfeasance.

Expand full comment
Jean's avatar

Many pregnant women who got the shot Miscarried or their babies were born dead. This has been widely covered up, like so many of the atrocities of this poison jab.

There was absolutely NO PROTECTION FROM ANYTHING.

"babies from newborn to 6 months old (who are not yet eligible for vaccination) are among those most often hospitalized for severe COVID."

THIS IS A COMPLETE FABRICATION! Tens of thousands of nurses have come forward to dispute this claim. The hospitals used the Fake PCR testing to diagnose CV-19, they lied about adults as well as children having the virus and received over 100 thousand for each patient that died while on Remdesivir, and the Vent. This criminality far exceeds 9/11.

Expand full comment
Karen's avatar

This question is like an opinion poll.

This question is like gathering thoughts for a debate competition. This question therefore is asked from a philosophical perspective.ie it could go on and on. But this I have my opinion you have yours of our current era is not strong with scientific facts.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

Heresy!

The Dems try to take all the credit but these shots were being injected into 🐑 Americans 🐑 before JOE was inaugurated, that is while Trump, Peace Be Upon Him, was still POTUS.

Expand full comment
Margaret Shattuck's avatar

YES!!!! The "rollout" started in December of 2020, a MONTH before Biden took office. So TRUMP rolled it out. There's just no way around that.

Trump funded it, and Trump rolled it out. He needs to own up to that.

Expand full comment
TJ's avatar

TRUE

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

It looks like RFK Jr's days are numbered:

Pfizer CEO goes to war with RFK Jr over mRNA vaccines amid cancer link

"Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla has slammed the government's decision to cut Moderna's vaccine funding and at a conference on Friday, he said that Moderna's new vaccine, called mRNA-1018, is 'extremely well tested [and] the science is proven'

'We are working to address those things as we agree to disagree on the things that divide us,' Bourla added on the subject.

The mRNA bird flu vaccine is based on the same technology as Pfizer's and Moderna's Covid vaccines.

The vaccine contains mRNA, which acts like a set of instructions for the body. Cells read the mRNA and temporarily produce a harmless piece of the bird flu virus like a decoy."

"HHS boss Robert F. Kennedy Jr has expressed deep skepticism regarding jabs, including the Covid shots — despite real-world evidence they saved millions of lives.

Bourla says that the issue with this and other changes to US health agency policies is that they are 'not based on any scientific data.... It's just based on a belief.'"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14772249/pfizer-ceo-war-rfk-Jr-mrna-vaccines-colon-cancer.html

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

very fascinating piece here and yes, RFK Jr. best up his security for these people dont play nice, it ain't only about 'disagreeing', these people play for all the marbles....

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

I posted this

Expand full comment
Dave S's avatar

I guess the $1 million Pfizer gave towards Trump's inauguration bash softened the blow a bit, what?

Trump likes to invite Bourla to din-dins at Mar-a-Lago it seems. Must be good buds.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

that was not a good dinner...we the people got nothing from it.

Expand full comment
Primum non nocere's avatar

Who signed the govt/D.O.D. contracts on behalf of the Govt with Moderna and Pfizer to prepurchase billions of doses of the shot long before the EUA was granted?... and what date was it signed?

Remember that big pharma was the govt contractor to distribute the shots. The R&D was all DOD/DARPA.... all protected by PREP Act

You all are asking the wrong questions....

Expand full comment
Primum non nocere's avatar

Doses were purchased before shot was even in initial clinical trials... go read Moderna SEC filing on the shot

Expand full comment
TJ's avatar
Jun 3Edited

Check ✅ this out. MUST READ This!

School Closings BEFORE Covid. 👇

https://billricejr.substack.com/p/i-scooped-the-lancet-and-cdc-by-nine?

Expand full comment
Primum non nocere's avatar

Neither Beyond a Reasonable Doubt not Preponderance of Evidence require a smoking gun.

If the DOJ doesnt bring the hammer down before the mid terms on everyone involved, then no justice will ever be done.

Expand full comment
Mark Smith's avatar

The concept that Trump isn't in on it is a difficult leap. The spending bill with all the AI prison planet setup is his love child which is far from MAGA. Kennedy is a sell out. Every bill should have a disclosure of who wrote it. None of the clowns in Congress have the capability to write a 1000+ page bill let alone read it.

We live in the land of propaganda 24/7. Does anyone think that Colorado incident over the weekend is real. Magically, the FBI is there to save the day.

Life is grand in the USA. Plandemic destroyed the little freedom we had left.

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

The only way big pharma can exist is to ply their conspiratorial playbook. The truth about drugs, vaccines and mRNA poisons must be hidden at all costs...and humanity pays a deadly price.

Expand full comment
richard noakes's avatar

Ref: ‘Vector Weaponisation‘.

They have rocket-propelled ordinances for dispersal of biological and chemical weapons against civilian populations, I just read it to you right out of the patent, there’s an RPG the US army has that can shoot biological weapons over a football stadium, and the good news is they can do that.

Re: bioterror attack “scheduled” to take place on 4 July 2025. The scenario predicts that 200,000 animals and 280,000 humans will perish in a single day.: Where in America would that be on 4 July 2025 is that your Independence Day?

Dr. David E. Martin, CEO of M-CAM, joined Matt Weinglass and Stephanie Pierucci on The Homeless Left podcast on Thursday to discuss a report that describes an exercise reminiscent of the Event 201 tabletop exercise held just months before the world was informed about a coronavirus “pandemic.”

Event 201 Recap: Entities that were affiliated with the WHO’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB) were instrumental in the Open Philanthropy-funded global coronavirus pandemic “desktop” exercise Event 201 in October 2019. This event, funded by the principal investor in Sherlock Biosciences (a beneficiary of the SARS CoV-2 EUA for CRISPR technology) and linking interlocking funding partner, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation into the GPMB mandated a respiratory disease global preparedness exercise to be completed by September 2020 and alerted us to anticipate an “epidemic” scenario. (Read more: ‘The Proposed Indictment’, Dr. David Martin, 2021)

This report, published by the US Bipartisan Commission on Biodefense in April/May 2024 and titled ‘The National Blueprint for Biodefence’, threatens a bioterror attack “scheduled” to take place on 4 July 2025. The scenario predicts that 200,000 animals and 280,000 humans will perish in a single day.

MAHA Movement Flabbergasted COVID-19 Vaccines Remain on Market

Emerald Robinson Asks: Who is Really Giving Orders on Never-Ending Shots?

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH: Jun 2

Robinson asked: “who was really giving the orders on vaccines?” McCullough said it appears to be someone above Trump and Biden. If Trump wanted to distinguish himself from Sleepy Joe, the boldest move he could make would be to pull the products of the market. Instead Trump remains in lockstep with Biden and maintains a no interview policy on the topic as the campaign grinds onward.

Expand full comment
TJ's avatar
Jun 3Edited

Bill Gates 😂 👇

Severe blood abnormalities in 98%

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/shocking-data-bill-gates-covid-replicon

Expand full comment
TJ's avatar
Jun 3Edited

Watch Dr Jordan Vaughn testified on the dangerous side effects of cJabs

👇

https://youtu.be/7QuTr4fIiyU?si=G4pLZReLEks_txYm

Expand full comment