Gupta et al. show that patients treated with various mAbs develop evasive Spike mutations with remarkable speed & high specificity & Immunocompromised patients receiving mAb therapy higher viral loads
& also show higher likelihood of developing de novo Spike mutations. 'Host immunological responses facilitate development of SARS-CoV-2 mutations in patients receiving monoclonal antibody treatments'
Thank you GWB.
Point: monoclonal antibodies cause mutations. Rapidly.
SOURCE:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36727404/
‘a prospective, observational, monocentric ORCHESTRA cohort study, conducted between March 2021 and November 2022, mild-to-moderately ill COVID-19 patients (n=204) receiving bamlanivimab, bamlanivimab/etesevimab, casirivimab/imdevimab, or sotrovimab were longitudinally studied over 28 days for viral loads, de novo Spike mutations, mAb kinetics, seroneutralization against infecting variants of concern, and T-cell immunity…
Patients treated with various mAbs developed evasive Spike mutations with remarkable speed and high specificity to the targeted mAb-binding sites. Immunocompromised patients receiving mAb therapy not only continued to display significantly higher viral loads, but also showed higher likelihood of developing de novo Spike mutations. Development of escape mutants also strongly correlated with neutralizing capacity of the therapeutic mAbs and T-cell immunity, suggesting immune pressure as an important driver of escape mutations. Lastly, we showed that an anti-inflammatory and healing-promoting host milieu facilitates Spike mutations, where 4 CIBs identified patients at high risk of developing escape mutations against therapeutic mAbs with high accuracy.’
So it would seem every government-sponsored covid countermeasure was later discovered to be more harmful than beneficial. What are the odds of that?
Sadly, many who were careful to avoid the jab, turned to what was just another rapidly developed, non-safety tested product. The research design had so many problems that even my neophyte skills could detect them. There was no proper informed consent for these products either. Look at how many monoclonal products are being pushed out into the marketplace now for other indications. Please, for the sake of humanity, do NOT accept a brand new pharma product which has been developed in the last 15 years without doing a LOT of homework. ie. going back to the safety trials. Even a layperson can pull the papers off pubmed and check if there has been a phase III trial with a sufficient number of research subject--the 'n'. If the 'n' is less than 3000 for a brand new drug (not needed for repurposed drugs) than ask for an alternative therapy.. This chemical war against the population has so many different shades (xenoestrogens, organic pollutants, normatization of injectable products into children, phlatates...) it seems to be unending.