Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Christine's avatar

An alarming number of vaccine recipients suffered from severe and debilitating complications. Growing increasingly concerned, the physician decided to study messenger RNA (mRNA) and its effects on DNA. After speaking with colleagues and conducting numerous experiments, she made a startling discovery. When the Bluetooth setting was activated near immunized individuals, a "unique identification code" appeared on her smartphone’s screen. Each person seemingly contained an internal technological device. During an interview transcribed by Orwell City, Dr. Brandolino shared her startling findings: Mónica Calcedo: The chip. Is that real or a lie? Dr. Brandolino: It’s a nanoprocessor. I say again that it is in plain view for those who want to see the micrographs of the electron microscope study made by Dr. Kalcker. It’s clearly seen in the magnification: a small, perfect, quadrangular, precise-edged, metallic corpuscle which is the same as any nanoprocessor in nanotechnology-responsive devices. That nanoprocessor is driven from a 4G Plus or 5G antenna. That is, all G technology is the same. The difference lies in that the packet of information that an antenna can transmit, is much larger in 4G Plus and 5G, 6G, and 7G. All that compact information is handled by a nanoprocessor— in a device which will be just inside our cells. By having Morgellons in the polyethylene glycol, they’re self-reproducing, it’s self-replicating. But because it’s in graphene… Graphene is a catalyst and, as I explained to you, makes that cell resonate with the 5G antenna and the microwaves of human thought. Can you understand that? There’s a nanoprocessor driven by a 5G antenna that goes directly to the workings of our brain.

Let's start of with step one, get an iPhone with Bluetooth enabled and put it on their arm - if vaccinated, a 10 Digit number (or thereabouts) will show on the iPhone face - I have suggested that an ideal solution, in the short term, is to find an electric fence, which keeps cattle in and grab it with both hands and get a shock through the body, then try the above test again (takes about 1 second to do - the shock makes said person let go quick) no number, theoretically the nanobots etc and parasites in blood have been killed - this is untried and we need feedback, to see if it works and I guess “there is an element of risk too” - this is my idea - don't do it if you have a Pacemaker, for example - if the number has gone, then theoretically the nanotechnology has short circuited and it won't receive 5G transmissions ordering the body to kill itself. My suggestion of the cattle electric fence is a suggestion of how we can find a voltage which gets the job done, more or less?

From Richard Noakes passed on by me

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

Obviously, we don't know squat-diddley about this entire mRNA gene altering injection parade. That's because as with all vaccines there have never been any true RCT trials using a true placebo that was neutral. There have never been any studies comparing groups of vaccinated verses non-vaccinated children or adults that track health differences for any length of time.

There was a study from a doctor in Oregon that was published a few years back which presented a stark comparison that was not favorable to the use of vaccines. They took away his license.

If you can read "Turtles All The Way Down " about vaccine myths, your view of big pharma's vaccine empire will turn around 180 degrees. It's one of the most fraudulent creations in history. Based not on pure science, but on hot air.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?