Icelandic vaccine study (Eythorsson et al.) show probability of reinfection higher in persons who had received 2 or more doses compared with 1 dose or less of vaccine (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.13-1.78)
probability of reinfection increased with time from the initial infection (odds ratio of 18 months vs 3 months, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.18-2.08)
‘In total, 11 536 PCR-positive persons were included. The mean (SD) age was 34 (19) years (median, 31 years; range, 0-102 years), 5888 (51%) were male, 2942 (25.5%) had received at least 1 dose of vaccine, and the mean (SD) time from initial infection was 287 (191) days (median, 227 days; range, 60-642 days). Reinfection was observed in 1327 persons (11.5%) during the Omicron period.
The probability of reinfection increased with time from the initial infection (odds ratio of 18 months vs 3 months, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.18-2.08) (Figure) and was higher among persons who had received 2 or more doses compared with 1 dose or less of vaccine (odds ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.13-1.78). Defining reinfection after 30 or more days or 90 or more days did not qualitatively change the results.’
The study seems unnecessarily convoluted to me. Why couldn't they simply group by age ranges and specific number of doses? Why didn't they want to look at the never-injected by themselves but lumped them in with one-dosers?
Is it too late to get all vacked up. Being sarcastic. Why can’t the CDC and NIH do something. We need a peasants revolt