Is there a link between giant cell arteritis and the Malone, Kariko, Weissman et al. mRNA (BioNTech/Pfizer) technology based vaccine: a double-edged sword? Yes, there is a link as per Anzola et al.!
83 year old female took the mRNA Pfizer shot; An FDG-PET/CT scan revealed an abnormal artery uptake suggestive of bilateral vertebral vasculitis, mainly on the in-bone portion of the artery (Fig. 1).
SOURCE:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8810207/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
‘Symptoms began 24 h after the first dose of COVID-19 mRNA (BioNTech/Pfizer) vaccine and were attributed to a post-vaccination reaction.’
‘An ultrasound exam in our fast-track clinic showed a non-compressible halo sign in the parietal branch of the right temporal artery (Fig. 1). Large vessel examination (carotid, subclavian, and axillary) was normal. Suspecting a new-onset giant cell arteritis (GCA), pulse steroids plus methotrexate were started. An FDG-PET/CT scan revealed an abnormal artery uptake suggestive of bilateral vertebral vasculitis, mainly on the in-bone portion of the artery (Fig. 1). Although the right temporal artery biopsy (TAB) was normal, the patient met the ACR criteria for GCA.’
Why can't Malone help reverse his mRNA jabs if theres a way, if there isn't then he should tell us that.
Does the author have to say that the benefits outweigh the risks in order to get published?