John Ioannidis: remember when Ioannidis published this & it was swept under the rug: "People <65 years old have very small risks of COVID-19 death even in pandemic epicenters and deaths for people
<65 years without underlying predisposing conditions are remarkably uncommon. Strategies focusing specifically on protecting high-risk elderly individuals should be considered" FREE book!
See substack instructions on how to get FREE book as appreciation or Christmas gift (in appreciation for your support):
Start here for Ioannidis discussion:
“Population-level COVID-19 mortality risk for non-elderly individuals overall and for non-elderly individuals without underlying diseases in pandemic epicenters”
SOURCE:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32846654/
Never forget we had the data early on and the lockdowns and lunacy was to stop near immediately but the power-drunk inept, and I argue malfeasant public health officials and decision-makers would not stop. They hardened the lockdowns and extended them and failed to consider the steep age-risk gradient and that COVID was purely amenable to risk stratification. That your baseline risk was prognostic on your outcome in terms of severity and death. Never forget this. The lunatics just chose to disregard all the science and data we had existing and which had accumulated.
Yes...and in Apr 2020, I posted an article to LinkedIn by Dr. Iaonnidis showing the same thing then. This was obvious and I thought very good news, but no.
For my "trouble," I got my first account suspension and the post removed. In addition. a woman in Germany saw the post and became enraged because "people are dying." She made contact with a connection of mine, saying I was a "disgrace" and should be fired. Story here: https://shethinksliberty.substack.com/p/about-me
Nice having so many you-know-whats in the world, huh?
They knew exactly what was going on (they created The Beast) and what they wanted to accomplish.
Lockdown was political for power, not for anyone's health. Ditto for masks.