Liberal animal rights interviewer to Ted Nugent: "what do you think is the last thought in the deer's head before you shoot him"? Ted: "deer don't think like that, they care about what is there to eat
Liberal animal rights interviewer to Ted Nugent: "what do you think is the last thought in the deer's head before you shoot him"? Ted: "deer don't think like that, they care about what is there to eat
I wonder if this is an apocryphal tale like the one about the soldier who was interviewed on the radio by a female host. The soldier was leading some local gun training for boys. The interviewer kept hammering the soldier with variations on the question, “aren’t you training them to become killers?” When the soldier had enough of that question he replied, “you’re equipped to be a hooker, but you aren’t one, are you?” Immediate interview termination.
I only eat fish, personal choice, not foisted onto other people who eat other types of meat. Keeping in mind I don't eat anything other than fish because I really LOVE animals, I am also keenly aware that the dogs & cats we keep as "best friends' would eat us if we were smaller with zero thought about the right or wrong of it, and I also am very aware that many of the animals I rescue don't "love me" nor are they "grateful" they have food etc. They are animals, they think and feel like their species, in no way should we put human emotions onto an animal. Having said that, I prefer most animals to humans so there's that.....Animals aren't evil, humans most definitely are.
I'm going off track here some, but can't help it....
One has to realize that had humans made the choice to reduce cruel and torturous treatment of animals in the past 45 years, the result would have been this: The bar raised for respect for life on Earth and the way humans behave culturally. The further result would have been a stronger hold on protecting humans -- that is, when the rights of animals to exist without cruel and avoidable suffering are recognized, the rights of humans are further concretized.
But it did not happen. And the animal rights movement was muzzled and smothered by Diane Feinstein's Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (2006) which branded as a terrorist anyone even passing out leaflets alerting the public of animal abuse by any laboratory or research concern, racetrack, feedlot, pet breeding factory, and so on. It did not matter what the circumstances were. Enterprise and commerce came first. And the door was opened to charging the dissemination of information as a terrorist act.
So, when we had a chance to choose to create humane steps to reduce suffering for the billions of animals used annually in industry, not only did that not happen, in the process humans lost the freedom of speech to communicate about the need for reforms and regulations. A mere 16 years later, and here we are losing our right to point out that our government's rogue bureaucrats are forcing the citizenry to take experimental drugs -- like any lab animal would be forced -- and if we speak out, we are branded as spreading disinformation which is now classified as an act of domestic terrorism. SEE A PATTERN HERE YET?
Each moral and ethical stand we take builds on our existing position. We are now losing our position of humans holding rights that are PROTECTED BY OUR GOVERNMENT because we allowed our government to incrementally reduce our position again and again. Feinstein's law against communicating information about animal abuse is one such reduction. It was an anti-freedom-of-speech law, an anti-information law, a muzzle of a law. It should have been challenged and found unconstitutional.
But it wasn't. And here we are.
More mandated injections, anyone? More mandated facemask muzzles, anyone?
If a liberal animal rights activist asked me such a question, I might say, humane treatment of a deer shot looks like this - your arms up the chest cavity to your shoulders removing the insides in one mass, then removing the heart, holding it aloft while saying a prayer for the spirit of the deer and letting it know it will feed my family, then leaving the heart aside for other animals of the forest, then taking the carcass home and dismantling it with a knife, wrapping the various pieces and freezing them, and then eating of the deer regularly for the next year, offering thanks to the deer each time.
Unless you were there to see it, they are counting on you being naive enough to believe everything they tell you about what happened, even if it didn't.
Another all to common example of a stupid human projecting onto a superior and sacred being what he, the disconnected pathetic and Godless, would actually be thinking about.
Nothing wrong with the humane death of an animal ... however most factory farm animals are kept in gulag-like horrifying conditions ... most chickens are raised in tiny cages and never step foot outside.. they are stuffed with so many growth hormones so that that grow as fast as possible that they bones cannot keep up therefore they cannot even walk if they were allowed to.
I wonder if this is an apocryphal tale like the one about the soldier who was interviewed on the radio by a female host. The soldier was leading some local gun training for boys. The interviewer kept hammering the soldier with variations on the question, “aren’t you training them to become killers?” When the soldier had enough of that question he replied, “you’re equipped to be a hooker, but you aren’t one, are you?” Immediate interview termination.
i believe the last thing to go through the deer's mind- is a bullet....;)
Add RINOs and that remark is spot on.
Ted's the MAN!!!
I only eat fish, personal choice, not foisted onto other people who eat other types of meat. Keeping in mind I don't eat anything other than fish because I really LOVE animals, I am also keenly aware that the dogs & cats we keep as "best friends' would eat us if we were smaller with zero thought about the right or wrong of it, and I also am very aware that many of the animals I rescue don't "love me" nor are they "grateful" they have food etc. They are animals, they think and feel like their species, in no way should we put human emotions onto an animal. Having said that, I prefer most animals to humans so there's that.....Animals aren't evil, humans most definitely are.
Ted's the man! --- Leave it to a dumba$$, blonde, liberal, woman to ask a stupid question like that.
I'm going off track here some, but can't help it....
One has to realize that had humans made the choice to reduce cruel and torturous treatment of animals in the past 45 years, the result would have been this: The bar raised for respect for life on Earth and the way humans behave culturally. The further result would have been a stronger hold on protecting humans -- that is, when the rights of animals to exist without cruel and avoidable suffering are recognized, the rights of humans are further concretized.
But it did not happen. And the animal rights movement was muzzled and smothered by Diane Feinstein's Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (2006) which branded as a terrorist anyone even passing out leaflets alerting the public of animal abuse by any laboratory or research concern, racetrack, feedlot, pet breeding factory, and so on. It did not matter what the circumstances were. Enterprise and commerce came first. And the door was opened to charging the dissemination of information as a terrorist act.
So, when we had a chance to choose to create humane steps to reduce suffering for the billions of animals used annually in industry, not only did that not happen, in the process humans lost the freedom of speech to communicate about the need for reforms and regulations. A mere 16 years later, and here we are losing our right to point out that our government's rogue bureaucrats are forcing the citizenry to take experimental drugs -- like any lab animal would be forced -- and if we speak out, we are branded as spreading disinformation which is now classified as an act of domestic terrorism. SEE A PATTERN HERE YET?
Each moral and ethical stand we take builds on our existing position. We are now losing our position of humans holding rights that are PROTECTED BY OUR GOVERNMENT because we allowed our government to incrementally reduce our position again and again. Feinstein's law against communicating information about animal abuse is one such reduction. It was an anti-freedom-of-speech law, an anti-information law, a muzzle of a law. It should have been challenged and found unconstitutional.
But it wasn't. And here we are.
More mandated injections, anyone? More mandated facemask muzzles, anyone?
If a liberal animal rights activist asked me such a question, I might say, humane treatment of a deer shot looks like this - your arms up the chest cavity to your shoulders removing the insides in one mass, then removing the heart, holding it aloft while saying a prayer for the spirit of the deer and letting it know it will feed my family, then leaving the heart aside for other animals of the forest, then taking the carcass home and dismantling it with a knife, wrapping the various pieces and freezing them, and then eating of the deer regularly for the next year, offering thanks to the deer each time.
Unless you were there to see it, they are counting on you being naive enough to believe everything they tell you about what happened, even if it didn't.
What will be Fauci's last thought be as the trap door is swung open?
Another all to common example of a stupid human projecting onto a superior and sacred being what he, the disconnected pathetic and Godless, would actually be thinking about.
Ted is a Rocker for sure, and what's not to like about his Kill it and Eat it
You can always depend on Uncle Ted to speak his mind, tell the truth and rally the patriots.
I love Ted Nugent!
Go to love Ted.
Nothing wrong with the humane death of an animal ... however most factory farm animals are kept in gulag-like horrifying conditions ... most chickens are raised in tiny cages and never step foot outside.. they are stuffed with so many growth hormones so that that grow as fast as possible that they bones cannot keep up therefore they cannot even walk if they were allowed to.
I wonder what Ted would have to say about this nightmare https://youtu.be/U6DGYvSfhPM