Lin's DEVASTATING study results (negative effectiveness) in US children less than 12 years of age (on top of Hansen's, Shrestha's, Dorabawila's, Nordström's, Buchan et al.) point to mRNA technology
based COVID gene injections undermining, subverting, dysregulating the immune system; in 2 months the immune system of kids under 12 were being harmed; can Kariko, Weissman, Malone speak to this?
SOURCE:
Regardless of sub-variant or prior infection and you can see the rapid waning immunity at 2 months onward:
None of these young kids should have been injected with a bioweapon, I blame the parents for not researching them first, after all they were experimental.
Why do the conclusions in their abstracts often, if not almost always, state the opposite of what the paper in fact shows?