Alexander COVID News-Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's substack

Share this post

Madewell et al. showed us in 2020 that asymptomatic transmission was just that, asymptomatic (no symptoms to spread) & was a LIE by CDC, Fauci, Francis Collins, Walensky; they lied! you were NOT

palexander.substack.com

Discover more from Alexander COVID News-Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's substack

COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2: natural immunity; innate immunity; vaccines and immune pressure; no vaccines for children; early outpatient treatment; lockdowns; school closures and mask mandates and vaccine mandates and emergency powers and truck convoy
Over 38,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Sign in

Madewell et al. showed us in 2020 that asymptomatic transmission was just that, asymptomatic (no symptoms to spread) & was a LIE by CDC, Fauci, Francis Collins, Walensky; they lied! you were NOT

transmitting, a devastating lie to get you to lock down, mask & rush to vaccine; Household secondary attack rates symptomatic cases (18.0%; 95% CI, 14.2%-22.1%); asymptomatic (0.7%; 95% CI, 0%-4.9%)

Dr. Paul Alexander
Mar 25, 2023
58
Share this post

Madewell et al. showed us in 2020 that asymptomatic transmission was just that, asymptomatic (no symptoms to spread) & was a LIE by CDC, Fauci, Francis Collins, Walensky; they lied! you were NOT

palexander.substack.com
15
Share

Household secondary attack rate in asymptomatic persons was 0.7% and included 0%, so basically none! 54 studies included in the review, near 80,000 persons. Yet this study was swept under the rug, covered up, not reported. Note the date. Yet they had you running around like a headless chicken thinking you were well, perfect, no symptoms, even testing negative, yet you ‘could’ still be infected and spreading. What a complete pack of bull sh*t we were fed and people bought it. I wrote about this study and others very early on. The medical community and doctors and academic scientists should be held to account. They knew they were lying.

SOURCE:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33315116/

‘A total of 54 relevant studies with 77 758 participants reporting household secondary transmission were identified. Estimated household secondary attack rate was 16.6% (95% CI, 14.0%-19.3%), higher than secondary attack rates for SARS-CoV (7.5%; 95% CI, 4.8%-10.7%) and MERS-CoV (4.7%; 95% CI, 0.9%-10.7%). Household secondary attack rates were increased from symptomatic index cases (18.0%; 95% CI, 14.2%-22.1%) than from asymptomatic index cases (0.7%; 95% CI, 0%-4.9%), to adult contacts (28.3%; 95% CI, 20.2%-37.1%) than to child contacts (16.8%; 95% CI, 12.3%-21.7%), to spouses (37.8%; 95% CI, 25.8%-50.5%) than to other family contacts (17.8%; 95% CI, 11.7%-24.8%), and in households with 1 contact (41.5%; 95% CI, 31.7%-51.7%) than in households with 3 or more contacts (22.8%; 95% CI, 13.6%-33.5%).’

Alexander COVID News-Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

58
Share this post

Madewell et al. showed us in 2020 that asymptomatic transmission was just that, asymptomatic (no symptoms to spread) & was a LIE by CDC, Fauci, Francis Collins, Walensky; they lied! you were NOT

palexander.substack.com
15
Share
15 Comments
Share this discussion

Madewell et al. showed us in 2020 that asymptomatic transmission was just that, asymptomatic (no symptoms to spread) & was a LIE by CDC, Fauci, Francis Collins, Walensky; they lied! you were NOT

palexander.substack.com
Dr Howard Tenenbaum
Mar 25

Like I said before. The word "asymptomatic" was *chosen* and was not used casually. It was used with intent, to divert the attention of people who might have had problems with the notion that HEALTHY people could transmit a disease. Or that HEALTHY people could test positive for a virus (with near universal false positive results). So instead of indiscriminately testing HEALTHY people, something most would have rejected, or at least there was a chance such testing would be rejected, the powers that be invented the term "asymptomatic testing". So everyone was sick, but just didn't know it... right.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
1 reply
Priscilla Schwartz
Mar 25

I'm not doctor, but I think this was the first time in history THE EXPERTS said people who were NOT SICK, could make others sick. It NEVER Mada any sense to me and I figured it was a pressure tactic to get people to comply.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
1 reply
13 more comments...
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Paul
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing