NATURAL IMMUNITY victory again! Chemaitelly et al.: "Duration of immune protection of SARS-CoV-2 natural infection against reinfection in Qatar"; so why take these injections that fail & are harmful?
Effectiveness of pre-Omicron primary infection against pre-Omicron reinfection was 85.5% (95% CI: 84.8-86.2%). Effectiveness peaked at 90.5% (95% CI: 88.4-92.3%) in the 7th month
We know that the protection from the COVID vaccines wane rapidly and now we estimate in weeks, and in some groups they argue in one week. So why not allow your natural immunity to protect you? Why take a failed vaccine that has been shown to be harmful and which damages your immune system? We know that antigenic fixation, imprinting, priming, prejudicing to the initial Wuhan strain occurs (original antigenic sin) and so the antibody response with exposure will be to the initial strain. There is immune exhaustion also due to the constant boosting as virus is circulating massively all the time and you will be exposed repeatedly and the vaccine itself is causing massive infectious pressure as driving infection in the vaccinated. It is a serious vicious cycle. This vaccine destroys the immune system.
“Effectiveness of primary infection against severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 reinfection was 97.3% (95% CI: 94.9- 98.6%), irrespective of the variant of primary infection or reinfection, and with no evidence for waning. Similar results were found in sub-group analyses for those ≥50 years of age…Protection against severe reinfection remains very strong, with no evidence for waning, irrespective of variant, for over 14 months after primary infection.”
SOURCE:
Duration of immune protection of SARS-CoV-2 natural infection against reinfection in Qatar
Remember this recent stack:
Sooo.....it seems that relative to natural immunity, the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus is pretty much just another common-cold coronavirus at this point. Immunity to reinfection wanes after a while, but practically nobody is going to die from it. Seems logical, and way less dangerous than the seasonal flu. Unless, of course, people get vaxxed and mess up their immune systems.
This study had a huge cohort, and the range of nationalities was very impressive. Makes for a powerful study.
I just read Mercola's newsletter article about how neither natural nor hybrid immunity can protect (antibody-wise) against current highly infectious (but not deadly) Omicron strain due to spike protein mutations that evade neutralization by both naturally acquired and injection-derived antibodies. But there's no such thing as hybrid immunity from infection plus vaccine, right? There's only natural acquired sterilizing immunity from infection, which is broad and durable and then there's a vaccine-trashed immune response, with out-of-date narrowly specific and brief non-sterilizing antibodies to a spike protein on a virus that no longer circulates, which appears to nullify previously acquired broad durable sterilizing immunity. I don't think there is accurate data to support the propaganda that natural acquired immunity in the never-jabbed is no good against this Omicron [and therefore everyone should get the Omicron booster!] Almost every nation has fudged the data on the never-jabbed by lumping them in with all the people who are in the 1 to 14-day black hole for hiding primary vaccine failure, of being injected but not considered to be vaccinated. And it's obvious that people got Covid after their doses, from the start, in droves, and often more than once. But we just don't have TRUE data on the Omicron infection experiences of the never-jabbed.