due to the Malone Bourla Bancel Sahin et al. mRNA transfection LNP injection! Add this to the pile of studies you will cite as you make the announcement SOON to BAN all mRNA shots from US market!
Please stop the character assassination. You know who Bobby is. Unlike the moronic DEM Senators, you know his writings and the seminal resource that CHD is. So why did Bobby say disingenuous things to “the enemy?” What is the strategy? Your take in this is as welcome as anyone’s. But to infer that his head is planted where the sun don’t shine is, IMO, misleading and counterproductive.
Celia Farber characterized this phenomenon as refusal to cast pearls before swine. Yes, I can see that. Ginger Taylor surmised that it leads to not only confirmation but to close private communication between Bobby and the likes of Senator Cassidy. The Truth, delivered by Bobby, will prevail in this process.
Here is another take. Remember Fred Meyer? He and two companions parachuted into the Alps near Innsbruck near the end of WWll. One of them was a Luftwaffe defector who led the group to his hometown where he was recognized immediately: “Dude, GET OUT OF SIGHT … NOW!” Family and friends provided Meyer, a German born boy from Brooklyn and a Jew, with papers as an officer on leave from combat. He drew a uniform and meal tickets from the quarter master, lived in the barracks, had dined with the officers where he learned all about Hitjer’s bunker in casual conversations.
Eventually Meyer was caught and beaten by the Gestspo, but he was rescued by Kommendant Hofe who needed a way to surrender Innsbruck just as the Americans were closing in. Before the Soviets got there. Meyer arranged the surrender.
Meyer of course survived the nasty beating but never betrayed his companions … especially the radio operator the Gestapo were trying to find.
In his conversations in the Officer’s dining room, Meyer did not tell his dinner acquaintances much about himself. How disingenuous he was! He LIED!
The Senate Commitee Hearings were Bobby’s time with the Gestapo, having parachuted into corporate captured enemy territory, looking to arrange the surrender of HHS. He said whatever was necessary to survive the beating..
Edward, I know him personally, we communicate as to my role, I have said he is the best among all the characters...and I do support him...and my discussions remain private but his silence is bad, real bad...they have muzzled him...and that study is for him to add to the evidence base that he has no other choice but to pull the shots NOW on confirmation.
I am from a different place, no amount of money or job...he would be more powerful if he did not go silent and note, the post he is applying for is the one I advised at HHS under Trump first term. Secretary and A Secretary
Understood. Ginger Taylor, somehow privy to the detailed list of agreements that bought key support from Senator Cassidy, would be in doubt if Bobby had not played along.
Had Bobby dug his heels in, the woefully ignorant Republicans like Murkowski and Collins would be beyond redemption. It seems they are anyway, but there may be hope.
Surely there are no Judas-RINOs among the rest of the Republicans.
Who is pushing the strategy we saw in the hearings … who but Trump?
Vance will break the tie if it comes down to it, but we are all weary of cliff hangers. In a world that is addicted to vaccines, where even Republicans repeat the lies about smallpox, polio, measles, flu and autism, it is plausible … likely … that hard core truth telling would produce a courageous FAILURE of confirmation. DON’T TAKE OUR PRECIOUS VACCINES AWAY YOU UPSTART! This is to be expected even from Republicans … even more than just Murkowski and Collins. What is in the drinking water in Maine? And in Alaska? Pharmaceuticals?
This is the reason for the pivot to emphasis on mass poisoning through FOOD AIR AND WATER. And it has worked. Sasha is right that vaccines are public enemy #1. But I vigorously disagreed that processed food and depleted topsoil are frivolous concerns … as she opined.
Whatever we in the choir think of the strategy … it is what it is. Fingers crossed!
JFK made deals with organized crime and reneged. Let’s trust it will work out now much better than that did! The difference today is that, in background, the DEMS and neocons are having their rug pulled!
It will be a surprise if Mitch McConnell votes for Bobby. John Curtis is also one to watch. Like his predecessor, he appears to be from the Ted Bundy faction of the Republicans. Bundy, a one time RNC delegate, was a Rockefeller Republican, like Romney. Based on his actions and politics when he was alive, Bundy if he was still alive today would have been a supporter of the Trump OWS program and of the Trump mRNA shot. Bundy if he had made it to the senate would have voted against confirming RFK Jr and Curtis, along with Mitch and Murkowski may do so too.
I agree, Dr. Paul. With each day that goes by without pulling the shots, more people DIE!!! That's the moral caveat we are dealing with here. This is NOT a frigging GAME, as some seem to want.
WELL SAID AS BEING A FUCKING HUGE TRAVESTY OFJUSTICE BASED ON THE KENNEDY FAMILIES SERVICE TO THIS NATION-THE CONDUCT OF THE DEMOCRATS DEMAND THEIR DEMISE SOONER RATHER THAN LATER-
The extent of apparent initial modest effectiveness of the Trump-Mengele/Malone-M.A.I.D mRNA Kill Shot against hospitalization and death in this VA funded study looks suspiciously high. Is the take home message to get frequently boosted?
"Limitation:
Potential for residual confounding and incomplete capture of COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2–related outcomes."
Damn straight! Use of propensity scores doesn't really mimic a randomized controlled trial. It can only adjust for variables that are measured in the data, leaving any unknown and unmeasured confounding factors unaccounted for, potentially introducing bias into the results.
Biases in COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness studies using cohort design
"healthy user bias, healthy vaccinee effect, frailty bias, differential depletion of susceptibility bias, and confounding by indication ... outcome misclassifications ... misclassification biases ... urgency to publish quickly may have further influenced these biases or led to their oversight, affecting the validity of the findings ... data infrastructure.
Addressing and mitigating these biases is essential for accurate VE estimates ... Transparent communication about these biases and rigorous improvement in the design of future observational studies are essential."
the issue is a well conducted observational cohort study well adjusted proper statistical approach procedural controls can be more suitable than a poorly done RCT...especially if small sample size. sequence generation is key and concealment of allocation. The RCT really is the most elegant best tool we have yet we can work around with proper high quality trust worthy gold standard 'real world' evidence.
this is my area...research methods and I am and have been involved in this methods...as part of the research methods groups...top in the world and I can tell you all of the vaccine research, drug research is corrupt bogus...the methods are bad and FDA should have approved nothing...
this is where Jay has to show if he understands the issues. this is not Stanford, this is now where the big dogs play...dogs like me, with the expertise and I will punish them openly if they play games.
I will use superior academics and expertise to highlight the games so all doggies in this battle coming to the table best come with the A game and know the fuck they doing for America needs to be fixed. this aint about meme coins...this is about fixing the rot properly
On occasion, all plausible residual confounding from observational studies may be working to reduce the demonstrated effect or increase the effect, if no effect was observed.
Rigorous observational studies will accurately measure prognostic factors associated with the outcome of interest and will conduct an adjusted analysis that accounts for differences in the distribution of these factors between intervention and control groups. The reason that in most instances we consider observational studies as providing only low-quality evidence is that unmeasured or unknown determinants of outcome unaccounted for in the adjusted analysis are likely to be distributed unequally between intervention and control groups, referred to as “residual confounding” or “residual biases.”
On occasion, all plausible confounders (biases) from observational studies unaccounted for in the adjusted analysis (i.e. residual confounders) of a rigorous observational study would result in an underestimate of an apparent treatment effect. If, for instance, only sicker patients receive an experimental intervention or exposure, yet they still fare better, it is likely that the actual intervention or exposure effect is even larger than the data suggest. A parallel situation exists when observational studies have failed to demonstrate an association.
Specifically, it is a sampling bias or selection bias: the kind of subjects that take up an intervention, including by enrolling in a clinical trial, are not representative of the general population. People who volunteer for a study can be expected, on average, to be healthier than people who don't volunteer, as they are concerned for their health and are predisposed to follow medical advice,[1] both factors that would aid one's health. In a sense, being healthy or active about one's health is a precondition for becoming a subject of the study, an effect that can appear under other conditions such as studying particular groups of workers. For example, someone in ill health is unlikely to have a job as manual laborer.
Yes, the VAX increased the incidence of disease. Did healthier people get sick, skewing the fatality and hospitalization statistics? We can't tell, but VAX proponents will argue this was a benefit. BUT they didn't allow consideration of ANY OTHER RX than the VAX, so don't be fooled! LOW RISK, HIGHLY EFFECTIVE EARLY TREATMENT WAS NOT ALLOWED. ONLY HIGH RISK, POORLY EFFECTIVE RX STUDIED! That's the counterargument here.
My concern is the billions of dollars wasted / used as a bribe and or spent, all around the world pushing an agenda of destruction, division and quite frankly, deranged lunatic behavior! These past four years under the illegitimate Biden presidency wasn’t about bringing America together, no, no, no it was about dividing America further apart!
Add to this, the mandated / forced mRNA Bioweapon which literally killed / murdered millions of people worldwide!
And we’re supposed to sit back, shut up and allow this to happen? I think not! America has a long road ahead. If America is going to survive this, it will take decades of steadfast common sense government! Otherwise the other alternative is become part of a “New World Order” totalitarian regime hellbent on complete power and control!
Please stop the character assassination. You know who Bobby is. Unlike the moronic DEM Senators, you know his writings and the seminal resource that CHD is. So why did Bobby say disingenuous things to “the enemy?” What is the strategy? Your take in this is as welcome as anyone’s. But to infer that his head is planted where the sun don’t shine is, IMO, misleading and counterproductive.
Celia Farber characterized this phenomenon as refusal to cast pearls before swine. Yes, I can see that. Ginger Taylor surmised that it leads to not only confirmation but to close private communication between Bobby and the likes of Senator Cassidy. The Truth, delivered by Bobby, will prevail in this process.
Here is another take. Remember Fred Meyer? He and two companions parachuted into the Alps near Innsbruck near the end of WWll. One of them was a Luftwaffe defector who led the group to his hometown where he was recognized immediately: “Dude, GET OUT OF SIGHT … NOW!” Family and friends provided Meyer, a German born boy from Brooklyn and a Jew, with papers as an officer on leave from combat. He drew a uniform and meal tickets from the quarter master, lived in the barracks, had dined with the officers where he learned all about Hitjer’s bunker in casual conversations.
Eventually Meyer was caught and beaten by the Gestspo, but he was rescued by Kommendant Hofe who needed a way to surrender Innsbruck just as the Americans were closing in. Before the Soviets got there. Meyer arranged the surrender.
Meyer of course survived the nasty beating but never betrayed his companions … especially the radio operator the Gestapo were trying to find.
In his conversations in the Officer’s dining room, Meyer did not tell his dinner acquaintances much about himself. How disingenuous he was! He LIED!
The Senate Commitee Hearings were Bobby’s time with the Gestapo, having parachuted into corporate captured enemy territory, looking to arrange the surrender of HHS. He said whatever was necessary to survive the beating..
Edward, I know him personally, we communicate as to my role, I have said he is the best among all the characters...and I do support him...and my discussions remain private but his silence is bad, real bad...they have muzzled him...and that study is for him to add to the evidence base that he has no other choice but to pull the shots NOW on confirmation.
he I think is worth our support.
I am from a different place, no amount of money or job...he would be more powerful if he did not go silent and note, the post he is applying for is the one I advised at HHS under Trump first term. Secretary and A Secretary
Understood. Ginger Taylor, somehow privy to the detailed list of agreements that bought key support from Senator Cassidy, would be in doubt if Bobby had not played along.
Had Bobby dug his heels in, the woefully ignorant Republicans like Murkowski and Collins would be beyond redemption. It seems they are anyway, but there may be hope.
Surely there are no Judas-RINOs among the rest of the Republicans.
Who is pushing the strategy we saw in the hearings … who but Trump?
Vance will break the tie if it comes down to it, but we are all weary of cliff hangers. In a world that is addicted to vaccines, where even Republicans repeat the lies about smallpox, polio, measles, flu and autism, it is plausible … likely … that hard core truth telling would produce a courageous FAILURE of confirmation. DON’T TAKE OUR PRECIOUS VACCINES AWAY YOU UPSTART! This is to be expected even from Republicans … even more than just Murkowski and Collins. What is in the drinking water in Maine? And in Alaska? Pharmaceuticals?
This is the reason for the pivot to emphasis on mass poisoning through FOOD AIR AND WATER. And it has worked. Sasha is right that vaccines are public enemy #1. But I vigorously disagreed that processed food and depleted topsoil are frivolous concerns … as she opined.
Whatever we in the choir think of the strategy … it is what it is. Fingers crossed!
JFK made deals with organized crime and reneged. Let’s trust it will work out now much better than that did! The difference today is that, in background, the DEMS and neocons are having their rug pulled!
Poor Pocahontas!
It will be a surprise if Mitch McConnell votes for Bobby. John Curtis is also one to watch. Like his predecessor, he appears to be from the Ted Bundy faction of the Republicans. Bundy, a one time RNC delegate, was a Rockefeller Republican, like Romney. Based on his actions and politics when he was alive, Bundy if he was still alive today would have been a supporter of the Trump OWS program and of the Trump mRNA shot. Bundy if he had made it to the senate would have voted against confirming RFK Jr and Curtis, along with Mitch and Murkowski may do so too.
I agree, Dr. Paul. With each day that goes by without pulling the shots, more people DIE!!! That's the moral caveat we are dealing with here. This is NOT a frigging GAME, as some seem to want.
they do have their heads up their asses
WELL SAID AS BEING A FUCKING HUGE TRAVESTY OFJUSTICE BASED ON THE KENNEDY FAMILIES SERVICE TO THIS NATION-THE CONDUCT OF THE DEMOCRATS DEMAND THEIR DEMISE SOONER RATHER THAN LATER-
The extent of apparent initial modest effectiveness of the Trump-Mengele/Malone-M.A.I.D mRNA Kill Shot against hospitalization and death in this VA funded study looks suspiciously high. Is the take home message to get frequently boosted?
"Limitation:
Potential for residual confounding and incomplete capture of COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2–related outcomes."
Damn straight! Use of propensity scores doesn't really mimic a randomized controlled trial. It can only adjust for variables that are measured in the data, leaving any unknown and unmeasured confounding factors unaccounted for, potentially introducing bias into the results.
Biases in COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness studies using cohort design
"healthy user bias, healthy vaccinee effect, frailty bias, differential depletion of susceptibility bias, and confounding by indication ... outcome misclassifications ... misclassification biases ... urgency to publish quickly may have further influenced these biases or led to their oversight, affecting the validity of the findings ... data infrastructure.
Addressing and mitigating these biases is essential for accurate VE estimates ... Transparent communication about these biases and rigorous improvement in the design of future observational studies are essential."
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11557388/
excellent, I love this, this now is speaking my expertise language...thank you for sharing
the issue is a well conducted observational cohort study well adjusted proper statistical approach procedural controls can be more suitable than a poorly done RCT...especially if small sample size. sequence generation is key and concealment of allocation. The RCT really is the most elegant best tool we have yet we can work around with proper high quality trust worthy gold standard 'real world' evidence.
this is my area...research methods and I am and have been involved in this methods...as part of the research methods groups...top in the world and I can tell you all of the vaccine research, drug research is corrupt bogus...the methods are bad and FDA should have approved nothing...
this is where Jay has to show if he understands the issues. this is not Stanford, this is now where the big dogs play...dogs like me, with the expertise and I will punish them openly if they play games.
I will use superior academics and expertise to highlight the games so all doggies in this battle coming to the table best come with the A game and know the fuck they doing for America needs to be fixed. this aint about meme coins...this is about fixing the rot properly
On occasion, all plausible residual confounding from observational studies may be working to reduce the demonstrated effect or increase the effect, if no effect was observed.
Rigorous observational studies will accurately measure prognostic factors associated with the outcome of interest and will conduct an adjusted analysis that accounts for differences in the distribution of these factors between intervention and control groups. The reason that in most instances we consider observational studies as providing only low-quality evidence is that unmeasured or unknown determinants of outcome unaccounted for in the adjusted analysis are likely to be distributed unequally between intervention and control groups, referred to as “residual confounding” or “residual biases.”
On occasion, all plausible confounders (biases) from observational studies unaccounted for in the adjusted analysis (i.e. residual confounders) of a rigorous observational study would result in an underestimate of an apparent treatment effect. If, for instance, only sicker patients receive an experimental intervention or exposure, yet they still fare better, it is likely that the actual intervention or exposure effect is even larger than the data suggest. A parallel situation exists when observational studies have failed to demonstrate an association.
Specifically, it is a sampling bias or selection bias: the kind of subjects that take up an intervention, including by enrolling in a clinical trial, are not representative of the general population. People who volunteer for a study can be expected, on average, to be healthier than people who don't volunteer, as they are concerned for their health and are predisposed to follow medical advice,[1] both factors that would aid one's health. In a sense, being healthy or active about one's health is a precondition for becoming a subject of the study, an effect that can appear under other conditions such as studying particular groups of workers. For example, someone in ill health is unlikely to have a job as manual laborer.
Because the FDA is ultimately Absolutely Corrupt.
Yes, the VAX increased the incidence of disease. Did healthier people get sick, skewing the fatality and hospitalization statistics? We can't tell, but VAX proponents will argue this was a benefit. BUT they didn't allow consideration of ANY OTHER RX than the VAX, so don't be fooled! LOW RISK, HIGHLY EFFECTIVE EARLY TREATMENT WAS NOT ALLOWED. ONLY HIGH RISK, POORLY EFFECTIVE RX STUDIED! That's the counterargument here.
boom boom
its not a matter of stopping funding, no, it is the under girding research is bull shit crap...all of it
#DefundTyranny #DepopulateTheDepopulators #FreedomIsNotFree
My concern is the billions of dollars wasted / used as a bribe and or spent, all around the world pushing an agenda of destruction, division and quite frankly, deranged lunatic behavior! These past four years under the illegitimate Biden presidency wasn’t about bringing America together, no, no, no it was about dividing America further apart!
Add to this, the mandated / forced mRNA Bioweapon which literally killed / murdered millions of people worldwide!
And we’re supposed to sit back, shut up and allow this to happen? I think not! America has a long road ahead. If America is going to survive this, it will take decades of steadfast common sense government! Otherwise the other alternative is become part of a “New World Order” totalitarian regime hellbent on complete power and control!
May God Bless America and The Entire World!
AJR
They will push this bio-weapon until every child is poisoned.
Crickets from those three...they are frauds, too.