82 Comments
User's avatar
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

just heard these 2 clowns for that this what they have now become are claiming we the public are confused and para do not understand and that they need a study of 6 months to figure out things...what utter bullshit crap...these idiots know the baseline risk is zero, no one can run any COVID study on any vaccines etc. there is no risk. you cannot get less than zero and what upsets me is that these 2 know this, just trying to bullshit us

Expand full comment
earl's avatar

Thank you for this piece. Sorry, but I don't understand when you say 'baseline risk is zero'. Please explain. Thanks in advance.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Taylor's avatar

It is unconscionable for Makary and Prasad AND Kennedy to allow even one more human being to be injected with a FAILED experiment known to be potentially fatal and in all likelihood disastrously harmful.

What will the informed consent disclosure preceding the mRNA covid shots (ANY spike protein shots) look like under their new policy?

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

this should have been stopped 6 months ago

Expand full comment
Kathleen Taylor's avatar

Sasha Latypova also weighs in with a scathing commentary, pulling no punches.

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/makary-and-prasad-new-covid-vax-fda

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

RAY FALCIOLA

RAY FALCIOLA

10h

When I read stuff like introductory near the beginning

"“...High-Risk” Populations (65+ and individuals with comorbidities, including infants 6 months and older):

Vaccines will continue to be authorized based solely on immunogenicity — the ability to generate antibody titers — without requiring demonstration of clinical benefit through randomized controlled trials (RCTs)...."

You can immediately see the subversive genius in all this. Putting the 65+ on the mRNA chopping block is pure synergistic genius. Hard to even compute the SSI savings from the anticipated early exists of the mRNA jabbed 65+ cohort. Just few years off of a few percent of the bombers alone is a government bonanza. Freeing up that otherwise wasted money spent on those in their not so Golden years to do even more diabolical things. And for the stubborn slow death cohort you can strip even more wealth from them on their way to their inevitable reward. And seriously what's the harm? Not like anyone is going to have grand children in the future. If they have kids their kids will swear off kids or be mRNA sterilized so why hang around? You got to admit. These guys don't have Harvard and other Ivy league degrees because they are stupid and don't don't know how to make money

And that little cut out "...including infants 6 months and older.." is absolutely genius. Seems like they're being sensible and cautious and even better, protecting the kiddies. When in reality almost ALL kiddies will be at high risk or have "comorbidities" because they take dangerous potentially health destroying vaccines, not just mRNA, and consume toxic food while being subjected to EMF from before birth. The miracle is when so many are healthy. But they're working on that. The regular vaccines can feed them in to the high risk category making them eligible for mRNA. Pure genius. Give the weak ones mRNA to weed them out early. These sorts of policy master strokes should be studied in elite universities across the world to train psychopath wannabes of the future.

It could be an undergraduate Public Policy 101 course like

How to make it look like you're doing something while honoring Same As It Ever Was

Take that course and you'll be snapped up by the DC crowd soon as you graduate

Expand full comment
Kathleen Taylor's avatar

Thank you for re-posting this, Dr Paul.. Many of the same thoughts crossed my mind. It's critical that we're aware of the repercussions of this new policy. A huge disappointment. Shocking, in fact.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

The question you raise with regard to the informed consent disclosure is a very important one. Will it state, for example, that the injection contents remain at the injection site until being rapidly eliminated from the body within a few days and that there have been "extremely rare" reports of usually minor adverse reactions but the benefits vastly exceed the risks?

Pfizer and Moderna have reportedly not yet commented on the granting last week by the FDA of what has been desribed as "full approval" to a new covid shot.

I wonder if this is because they have new shots in the pipeline for which they also are expecting "full approval" and have reasonable grounds for doing so.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

IMO they are working together...have to be. this paper tells me we are being screwed

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

I like your post...once one knows how to read it

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

They're in lockstep and the US is being screwed like a house cat in heat by these bastards.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

The Nigthingale

The Nigthingale

1h

👏👏👏 Outstanding explanation!!

These new so called FDA experts are either paid, gutless or power/fame seeking people!

They can’t be ignorant of the harm and deaths from these deadly shots?? Not after 5 years?!

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

James Wobschall

James Wobschall

11h

I am very disappointed the all of the Agency heads for doing this. RFK, JR, HS, Marty McKary, FDA and Trump nominee, Susan Monarez, CDC

They have to know that mRNA is dangerous for use in humans, animals and in all food production activity.

It isn't even a close call to make the decision to ban the mRNA injections, of any kind.

Disappointed!

Expand full comment
Kathleen Taylor's avatar

Good questions about the integrity of new informed consent disclosures, now that we have the data and knowledge to challenge deliberate pharmaceutical company misrepresentations.

It will be interesting to learn how Pfizer and Moderna respond to these new policies. I suspect they are relieved for the moment and may have plans to conduct large-scale advertising campaigns to secure their faithful customer base and to instill fear in customers who have become "hesitant." After all, there is a large market among those on the eligibility "exception" list provided by Makary and Prasad.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

this NEJM paper is such bull, such a disappointment

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

full disclosure I am being considered for a post and I will not be silent and I may get myself out of the post by these writings but I am stating fact and truth. I will not be silenced and still in this I support 47...for I cannot think he is that clueless and I feel he is benevolent.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Taylor's avatar

They need your energy and uncompromising commitment to the Truth, come what may. Our country owes it to us to tell us the Truth and begin to make things right.

I believe that you can help President Trump come to understand what he needs to do to rectify this artificially-induced health crisis, to rescind laws granting pharmaceutical companies legal immunity and to compensate the injured.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

Please don't convert overnight to thinking that the shots need to be rolled out faster with fewer exemptions and that it's important to go silent about the harms.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

There is a very large market on the exemption list. I want to see the shots banned, withdrawn, not stealthily phased out with the public left thinking there was nothing wrong with them.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Taylor's avatar

Exactly. Me, too.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

There is no scientific justification for continuing a program for a vaccine that doesn’t prevent transmission or infection.

The committee must stop prioritizing Pharma profits at the expense of public health and must finally recognize that injury from vaccines including COVID shots is real – and not rare.

COVID shots for all age groups can’t be justified when, prior to the availability of COVID shots, “the median infection fatality rate of COVID-19 was estimated to be 0.034% for people aged 0–59.”

There is a 318% higher mortality rate among quadruple-jabbed youth compared to those who skipped the shot.

Pfizer trial data revealed an alarming fetal death rate (87.5%) among women whose pregnancy outcomes were known.

It’s an egregious health threat to our nation’s children to authorize such a dangerous and potentially lethal product for infants as young as six months old.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

a game, read the NEJM properly and you realize its nothing but a game.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

psyOP continues

Expand full comment
Rich's avatar

Paul, same doll different dress.

The entire covid psy op was and is a genocidal mass murder tactic by the death cult.

There never was a pandemic, never was a deadly virus.

47 plays a big part, if he was half a man of honor he would have fallen on the sword and admitted he was used to slaughter millions by pushing and standing by this death jab, his beautiful vaccine, that he boasts saved millions of lives. No 47 you killed millions. Is the orange dye from your hair frying your brain cells.

Even an octopus at this point has the IQ and band width to understand and tell the truth.

You want to make America great again while you poison and destroy its people with your beautiful vaccine. F---k you 47.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

one thing Rich, I am with you 100% but cant put Trump there...no...then I will give up for then what else is to fight for if our POTUS did us wrong...so I WILL meet you on any of these hills to defend them but not against 47...not what I know.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

he is not nefarious, he trusted them in COVID, many deceived him, lied to him...maybe you and I would have made the decisions, some if we were in his position. so I still stand with him. and defend him.

Expand full comment
DistantSun's avatar

Exactly how I feel. He was duped. Reports that he was assured that the drug would be tested and released only if shown to be safe. They all lied to him, and it is seriously an echo chamber in there, thw prwsident can be very isolated from whatever they want to isolate him from, good or bad. If he doesn't take steps himself to get the information he needs, rather than relying on the people around him, he can very easily be manipulated big time.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

yes, a POTUS can be very isolated....manipulated. there is lots we do not know. we have to hope as we wage the battle and we are making a difference. dont stop.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

same doll, different dress, I love it, will use it.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

never was a pandemic, I love it.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

we locked down to nothing, we brought a vaccine to nothing. something harmed some of our elderly etc. but not what we were led to believe and we must get to the bottom of it, who and how and why

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

we may not want to learn US govn was involved.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
May 20
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

yes

Expand full comment
Luc Lelievre's avatar

Agree. Awful.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

I am sorry, some of the people given jobs with Trump got them to be silenced...and they, these 2 with this paper is telling me we may have been sadly correct. this is simply continuing FDA insanity and risk to the public. these 2 should be ashamed. it is as if they are selling mRNA vaccine.

Expand full comment
DistantSun's avatar

Thank you for your courage in continuing to call out the bullshit.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

thank you for being here.

Expand full comment
richard noakes's avatar

The Lancet, back in 2021 or thereabouts published that Moderna's vaccine was about 1.2% effective against Covid and Pfizer's vaccine 0.84% - less than 1% effective - not the 96% that they said their vaccines were - ARR vs RRR - so the vaccines were never about Covid, but preparing people vaccinated into Gene Therapy Injected GMO's, which they all now are - so the next step, presumably, is to change them into AI GMO's as a quick and cheap way to make instant Robots - with Trump's latest "Big Beautiful Bill" above.

Expand full comment
Rich's avatar

Paul even in a marriage, a long marriage of 30 years one can be betrayed by one of the partners.

When you look at the actions of 47, his ownership and love of what you and I and millions of other people know to be a bio weapon, his death jab, his embracing of the most evil Larry Ellison who along with a few other scumbag criminals was hailed by 47 as ushering in a great moment for mankind with their 500 billion dollar embrace of mRNA jabs.

Bio weapons meant to kill destroy and cause suffering.

Our power and ultimately our success is our collective destiny,. is not delivered by 47 or any selected puppet who plays the power game. It is a product of our fearless actions and resolve.

47 has already committed numerous crimes of high treason and terrorism.

A 30 minute press conference, a speech by 47, could expose and begin to reverse all the evil he has done.

Why will he not do it, because his handlers will not permit it.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

your writing fascinates me

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

'A 30 minute press conference, a speech by 47, could expose and begin to reverse all the evil he has done.

Why will he not do it, because his handlers will not permit it.'

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

let us hold out some hope he will break free...I do...thank you for being here and your sage...I will defend 47

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

Just you wait till September when the HHS states emphatically and with no due respect that vaccines DO NOT cause autism. The murdering Pig Pharma scum and the murdering cowards of the HHS must be saved at all costs. You can trust NO HHS people.

Autism? Caused by environment (how do the assess that?), possibly garbage in foods (which garbage?), metabolic disease (how does that come about?) or trauma and stress (during the early months of life)...and possibly a host of other poppycock.

I will be shocked if the HHS has the balls to pivot toward vaccines as the true cause of autism...which we ALL know it is. Thus far, the HHS and congress are STILL protecting big pharma to the max. Why is that EVER gonna change?

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

agreed, I have said this, the game now is to say autism caused by the air we breath and environment...not vaccine etc. the new FDA will move to sanitize vaccine...but they will need deal with me. the likes of me...in print

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

boom

Expand full comment
Kathleen Taylor's avatar

My view: Autism results from genetic susceptibility negatively stimulated by toxins in "vaccines." (Although Autism has been diagnosed in some unvaccinated children.)

It's not worth the risk to allow known-to-be dangerous adjuvants to be injected into newborns when there is next to zero risk they will be exposed to most diseases they are "vaccinated" for at birth.

Note: It's important to differentiate between "Autism" and mental retardation caused by other factors. There are very distinct and clear differences.

Expand full comment
Jorge Fernandez's avatar

The simplest questions are, once again: WHY are filthy rats allowed to remain free to do harm? WHO is mostly responsible for this to continue? WHO can, with a bold command, end this? Lastly, WHY won't that command be issued? You and I both know the answers.

Expand full comment
Jean's avatar

As I have said before, how can you expect the Trump administration to stop the death jab, when Trump is determined to give America as many mRNA injections as possible? Trump didn't announce OWS right out of the gate, promising 500 BILLION to produce it, only to have it squashed by those he appointed. Trump is a Trojan Horse.

Expand full comment
George Romey's avatar

COVID 19 is no longer a "thing" and really never was. The morons still walking around with a mask on should be highly encouraged to continue their jab regiment.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

thank you for this.

Expand full comment
Shelagh Anne Shackleton's avatar

Many thanks Dr Alexander. I am tired of the mealymouthed apologists for the MRNA mass culling program.

The MRNA platform is great for killing, disabling and neutering humans while treating them as ATMs which Big Pharma and Big Government loot at will.

I think,

Makary and Prasad have been co-opted by Big Pharma and Big Government, with both cash and flattery.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

they are co-opted. now.

Expand full comment
richard noakes's avatar

I agree totally with you. We must continue to refuse all vaccines - but what bothers me most is that they were ordered by the Military and for the Military and they make everyone who volunteered to have them into GMO's and since the Military did this for a reason, when does the Military start doing phase 2 and advancing the GMO's enhancements: This is insanity. Unregulated Ai will have zero responsibility to respect human rights. Elon Musk stated he wanted ‘zero regulations, all regulations gone’ and now Congress may be granting Elon’s wish in the ‘One Big Beautiful Bill Act.’

Congress Will Vote to Strip States of Their Power to Regulate Artificial Intelligence—for the Next 10 Years

As Trump's $500B ‘Stargate’ AI grid is underway, Regeneron acquires 23andMe—handing Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Big Government unchecked access to your weaponizable DNA.

Jon Fleetwood

May 20

Buried deep in Congress’s 1,116-page “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” is a provision so sweeping, so dystopian, and so underreported that it’s hard to believe it was passed at all.

Section 43201 of the bill, blandly titled the “Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology Modernization Initiative,” doesn’t just fund the federal government’s full-scale AI expansion—it removes every state’s right to regulate artificial intelligence for the next decade.

Let that sink in: For the next ten years, no state in America—not even your state—will be allowed to create its own safeguards, protections, or liability standards for how AI is developed or deployed.

“No State or political subdivision thereof may enforce any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models… during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.”

—Sec. 43201(c)(1) of the bill

This is not a theoretical threat.

It’s a federal ban on local AI regulation—handing the reins to the very bureaucrats and corporate tech giants already embedding AI into military systems, healthcare, financial markets, education, and law enforcement.

This section of the bill is a preemptive strike against state sovereignty.

It neuters legislatures and governors from protecting their own citizens—just as powerful corporations and federal agencies rush to install AI systems into every layer of society.

It’s not just overreach.

It’s a federal power grab dressed as “modernization.”

And President Trump is now marching on Capitol Hill to personally demand the bill’s passage—pushing the very legislation that would shield his $500 billion Stargate AI surveillance grid from any state-level resistance (more on this below).

The bill—developed by the House Budget Committee, which passed the legislation yesterday—still needs to be voted on in the House and Senate before it hits Trump’s desk, so if you want your senators and representatives to vote no on it, you can contact them here and tell them why.

The House is expected to vote on the One Big Beautiful Bill by the end of this week.

Legal Immunity for the Machines—and Their Makers

The bill doesn’t just block states from writing new AI laws.

It also forbids states from enforcing existing protections that touch on:

How AI is trained

What data it collects

Whether it discriminates

How it documents its decisions

What fees are charged

Whether citizens can sue

States are prohibited from imposing “any substantive design, performance, data-handling, documentation, civil liability, taxation, fee, or other requirement” unless the federal government already does.

—Sec. 43201(c)(2)

In plain terms: If the feds don’t regulate it, no one can.

PERHAPS?

Expand full comment
Patti Johnson's avatar

Goodness gracious, why are these two clowns still there anyway? Where is RFK Jr.? I really had high hopes for change yet where is it? I have tried to be patient. Big deal red dye number 2 or whatever is out. I never ate it anyway. I never ate the processed or fast foods either. I want these bioweapons banned and out of here NOW! Thank you Dr. Alexander for continuing to shine the light on what is really going on. God bless your work.

Expand full comment