Risch asked a good question today and I am extending it here; the FDA played a misdirection fraud game on the public with Pfizer and Comirnaty and now same with spikevax and moderna...why??
The FDA is a corrupted agency working for PHARMA and there is a reason for this bait and switch; there is no reason for the EUA to remain in place unless the Moderna Vaccine and Spikevax are different
So alike the fraud with the Comirnaty that is not available in US, the FDA has now approved Spikevax BLA, yet states at the same time that the Moderna vaccine EUA remains in place as per their public document below:
‘On January 31, 2022, the FDA announced the second approval of a COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Spikevax, for the prevention of COVID-19 in individuals 18 years of age and older. Spikevax has the same formulation as the EUA Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine and is administered as a primary series of two doses, one month apart. Spikevax can be used interchangeably with the EUA Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine to provide the COVID-19 vaccination series.
Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is available under EUA as a two-dose primary series for individuals 18 years of age and older, as a third primary series dose for individuals 18 years of age and older who have been determined to have certain kinds of immunocompromise, and as a single booster dose for individuals 18 years of age and older at least five months after completing a primary series of the vaccine.
The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is also authorized for use as a heterologous (or “mix and match”) single booster dose for individuals 18 years of age and older following completion of primary vaccination with a different available COVID-19 vaccine. For example, Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and Janssen COVID-19 vaccine recipients 18 years of age and older may receive a single booster dose of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine.’
www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/spikevax-and-moderna-covid-19-vaccine
I'm hoping that the case brought by the navy seals, which I believe addresses the EUA / full approval bait-and-switch, will see this addressed by a judge. The FDA is not allowed to create new legal categories like this 'approved to go in your body but not approved for liability purposes' nonsense. It is more than a blemish on them. It is a mortal blow to their credibility.
One reason has got to be for the military mandate, which they have pushed as hard and fast as they can, including boosters. DOD can only mandate FDA approved vaccines, or an EUA can be used with a Presidential waiver, like they did with anthrax but has not been done in the case of Covid. With Comirnaty not available, DOD claimed that the EUAs were “interchangeable” so they could continue to force vaccinate, but, federal court struck down that claim citing differences in licensing, formulations and ingredients. Yet they have unlawfully continued. DOD’s “official” policy on boosters is that they are not mandatory but “encouraged”. And by encouraged they mean getting an entire carrier out to sea and then bringing on boosters, telling all aboard they must get the booster if they want to leave the ship, including those that have flight ops that same day.