The curious case of PEDOPHILIA, Epstein, Bill Clinton etc. now dealt properly by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World, asking the real question: "real story that mainstream media refuses to investigate is
why federal judges in New York have been allowed to secret away in sealed documents puzzle pieces to how Epstein’s network of powerful men ran a sex trafficking ring for two decades; JPMorgan Chase?
‘real story that mainstream media refuses to investigate is why federal judges in New York have been allowed to secret away in sealed documents the puzzle pieces to how Epstein’s network of powerful men were able to run a sex trafficking ring for two decades with the “active participation” of the largest federally-insured bank in the United States, JPMorgan Chase; and right under the nose of its Chairman, CEO and media darling, Jamie Dimon.’
Start 2nd’s excellent brave scholarship here:
‘Throwing the likes of Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, George Mitchell, Jeal Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, Marvin Minsky, Tom Pritzker and various other John Doe sex addicts under proverbial buses is nothing more than a distraction.
At this stage of the game is the following really a major revelation?:
So why is this “release” happening now, and what is the real coverup?
Mainstream Media Is Avoiding the Big Story on Jeffrey Epstein and Sealed Court Documents
by Pam Martens and Russ Martens
Over the past week, more than a dozen of the biggest mainstream news outlets have published articles about the possibility of scandalous news breaking this week from the unsealing of documents in a federal court case involving the sex trafficker of minors, Jeffrey Epstein.
Typically, responsible news outlets wait for the actual news to break before hyping the possibility of it breaking. At 5:59 a.m. this morning, Newsweek updated the story as follows:
“Some on social media are speculating that the public disclosure of more than 150 names associated with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has been delayed.
“Judge Loretta A. Preska signed an order on December 18 for the public release of the identities of more than 150 people mentioned in court documents from a now-settled 2015 civil lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre that centered on allegations that Epstein’s associate and former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell facilitated her sexual abuse.
“Several prominent figures, including former President Bill Clinton and Britain’s Prince Andrew are expected to be named. The list will also include sex abuse victims and Epstein’s employees.”
Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, and dozens of other prominent men in politics, finance and law have already been named, repeatedly, in the media as people who socialized or had suspect dealings with Epstein. So this is not a new story.
The real story that mainstream media refuses to investigate is why federal judges in New York have been allowed to secret away in sealed documents the puzzle pieces to how Epstein’s network of powerful men were able to run a sex trafficking ring for two decades with the “active participation” of the largest federally-insured bank in the United States, JPMorgan Chase; and right under the nose of its Chairman, CEO and media darling, Jamie Dimon.
This is the Big Story that has been left to wilt on the vine by the likes of the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post and their peers.
The answers to this Big Story will not be found in the documents slated to be unsealed by Judge Loretta Preska in the Virginia Giuffre case. They have been sealed and locked up tight in Judge Jed Rakoff’s courtroom after he oversaw multiple Epstein-related lawsuits brought against JPMorgan Chase in late 2022 and 2023.
One case, Jane Doe v JPMorgan Chase, was a class action on behalf of Epstein’s sex assault and sex trafficked victims. Judge Rakoff approved its settlement for $290 million despite objections from 17 Attorneys General and the settlement’s unconscionable terms that included releasing claims for “harm, injury, abuse, exploitation, or trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein or by any person who is in any way connected to or otherwise associated with Jeffrey Epstein, as well as any right to recovery on account thereof.” Claimants were also required to sign the release form before they learned if they would get a dime from the settlement.
Attorneys for the victims were not left in any such doubt. The settlement terms provided them with $87 million in legal fees and $2.5 million in expenses.
Releasing claims against “Any person who is in any way connected to or otherwise associated with Jeffrey Epstein” conveniently includes a number of billionaires referred by Epstein to JPMorgan Chase as clients. There are also literally hundreds of high-profile individuals that were listed in Epstein’s little black book that could be considered “connected” to him.
Many of the individuals listed in Epstein’s little black book – a total of 1,571 – have had important banking relationships with JPMorgan Chase. In a court filing on July 26 of last year by the Attorney General of the U.S. Virgin Islands, which has since settled its Epstein-related case against JPMorgan Chase for $75 million, it listed the following individuals as people Epstein referred as clients to the bank: Microsoft co-founder and billionaire Bill Gates; Google co-founder and billionaire Sergey Brin; the Sultan of Dubai, Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem; media and real estate billionaire Mort Zuckerman; and numerous others.
Epstein’s victims charged in their lawsuit that JPMorgan Chase had, for more than a decade, provided Epstein with cozy banking services, which included sluicing to him millions of dollars in hard cash from his accounts, sometimes as much as $40,000 to $80,000 a month. The bank failed to file the Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) that it is legally required to file with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) for those payments in cash. Epstein’s alleged quid pro quo with the bank included him referring valuable business deals and clients to JPMorgan Chase. These allegations were substantiated by 22 pages of internal bank emails released in the related case brought against the bank by the U.S. Virgin Islands.
A third Epstein-related case was brought against JPMorgan Chase in Rakoff’s court by two public pension funds that owned shares of JPMorgan Chase. That lawsuit named Dimon as a defendant as well as current and former members of JPMorgan Chase’s Board of Directors. It was brought by a prominent class action law firm on behalf of shareholders of the bank. The lawsuit’s theory of the case was that specific members of the Board of JPMorgan Chase “put their heads in the sand” and ignored that the bank had become a cash conduit for Jeffrey Epstein’s child sex trafficking ring because they were hoping that their own verifiable business ties to Epstein “would go unnoticed.” (We might add an attendant thesis: that Dimon takes very good care of his Board in return for them taking very good care of him.)
Mainstream media ignored the allegations that members of the JPMorgan Chase Board of Directors had business ties with Epstein and Judge Rakoff wasted no time in dismissing the case on technical grounds. (This was not the first time that a major scandal involving JPMorgan Chase received a news blackout by mainstream media.)
The other Big Story is why after 18 years of police and FBI investigations of Epstein and his wide sex trafficking ring, the U.S. Department of Justice has brought criminal charges against only two people: Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
There is also no indication, at present, that the Justice Department is preparing to bring a criminal case against JPMorgan Chase, despite its recidivist history of felony charges (including two felony counts for money laundering) and a former FBI agent’s statement on how the bank “impeded” a criminal investigation of Epstein. (See: New Court Documents Suggest the Justice Department Under Four Presidents Covered Up Jeffrey Epstein’s Money Laundering at JPMorgan Chase.)
The real puzzle pieces are the thousands upon thousands of hours of videotape that Epstein recorded across all of his hidden cameras throughout his various homes and getaways. That is the most damning evidence, and it will never be released.
Former US Attorney General Bill Barr conned President Trump, ran cover for the CIA, MOSSAD, MEGA Group, and other entities that worked with Epstein. And then Bill Barr had Epstein suicided, and laughed about it during his MSM interviews.
The fact that Bill Barr’s father, author of a depraved pedo sci-fi novella, hired Epstein as a teacher in a prestigious NYC prep school is also no coincidence.
The fact that JPMorgan Chase, which aided and abetted Epstein’s sex trafficking ring for decades, is one of the owners of the Federal Reserve should give further pause as to why there is a central bank to begin with that is neither Federal nor has any actual reserves, and what deeper global financial scams are afoot leveraging powerful pedophiles.
Here is some more color on the Epstein network:
What Does A Rothschild, A Goldman Sachs Top Lawyer And A CIA Agent Have In Common?
·
APRIL 30, 2023
The pedo rabbit hole goes deep, and it also ties directly and indirectly straight into the whole PSYOP-19 democide program.
They want you dead.
Do NOT comply.’
No, the real story is what happened to the video tapes of all those men f**king minors the FBI seized from Epstein’s island and NYCity penthouse? Had you or I been on those tapes our names would have already been plastered on newspapers and tv screens around the world and we’d already be in prison or dead. But, no, the FBI and other intel services will protect those wealthy men in order to use them for their evil plans.
So far, as all of this new wave of ballyhoo now seems to be happening by way of one tranche after another, nothing really new seems to be exposed.
We've all been prepared for the regurgitation of names such as Clinton, Derschowitz, Prince Andrew etc., however as other inocuous names like Cate Blanchett and David Copperfield continue to drop one might ask... 'so what...?'
Where's the actual evidence of wrongdoing on the part of any of these people...? Maybe a massage or two reportedly occurred....so what?
So we're still in a world of name slinging around organized pedophilia, with rare mention of possible high level political or monetary blackmail and still, after all this time and so much media hoopla, only one person has ever been dragged before a court over all of it, and that's a female who could be described as the world's mega patsy, Ghislaine Maxwell.
This is all so much a continuation of the placatory diversion and snow-jobbing that thinking people know it to be, because the ever present elephant in the room, the FBI accessed and very tightly secured incriminating CCTV tapes from all the Epstein residences depicting the shenanigans of all the people from high places are rarely mentioned, and least of all do we ever hear any demands whatsoever for their release, while this should be front and center!
It's like, although at the time of their seizure via much publicized FBI raids we saw images of many boxes filled with VHS cassettes being loaded into official black vans, those boxes and their illuminating and damning contents, the only real evidence, have apparently disappeared.