This one graph from Shrestha et al. (Cleveland clinic study) really should have ended the fraud COVID mRNA gene injections; shows clear DOSE response, unvaccinated at LOWEST risk contracting COVID,
palexander.substack.com
This one graph from Shrestha et al. (Cleveland clinic study) really should have ended the fraud COVID mRNA gene injections; shows clear DOSE response, unvaccinated at LOWEST risk contracting COVID,
separated by BA.4/BA.5 lineage, BQ lineage, XBB lineage
21
This one graph from Shrestha et al. (Cleveland clinic study) really should have ended the fraud COVID mRNA gene injections; shows clear DOSE response, unvaccinated at LOWEST risk contracting COVID,
palexander.substack.com
The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19 (Figure 2).
Enlarged:
SOURCE:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v3.full.pdf
21
This one graph from Shrestha et al. (Cleveland clinic study) really should have ended the fraud COVID mRNA gene injections; shows clear DOSE response, unvaccinated at LOWEST risk contracting COVID,
palexander.substack.com
Isn't it utterly remarkable that as of yet, this paper has not been published in a peer reviewed journal? Had the study found vaccine protection, and let's also say that such a study also had fatal flaws it still would have been published within days of submission! There is something rotten in academia and that's an understatement.
The graph is crystal clear. Undeniable. And yet the farce continues.