Discover more from Alexander COVID News-Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's Newsletter
WARNING: FDA, CDC, NIH, Moderna, & Pfizer official (s) expressed their serious concerns with these mRNA vaccines at HHS, especially for children, very fearful of their safety & career destruction
I restate what was shared with me, privately, confidentially, at HHS (Operation Warp Speed) around July and August 2020, 6 months or so prior to the roll-out of the vaccines
Two FDA, 1 CDC, 1 NIH, 1 Moderna, and 1 Pfizer official/scientist. I share again that my office was on the 6th floor of HHS just below the office of OWS and Moderna on the 7th. What I share again is as a warning.
They shared many things surrounding the vaccine development, its safety in their view, and the politics of OWS and how it was being handled to hurt Trump. It was always shocking to me how the deepstate and such within public health e.g. CDC, NIH etc. were conspired against the POTUS, even in the midst of a pandemic. What they shared without my getting granular (and the focus here in this substack is only on the children vaccine discussions) is that:
1)they understood (para) that the vaccine trials (focus on children) being planned and ongoing (already at any level) were deliberately undersized and shortened as to duration of follow-up, so that safety signals would not be possible (emergent); this would allow the trial results to appear much more beneficial; this greatly bothered them and they were afraid to raise it and push back out of retaliation fears
2)they expressed serious concern with the lipid-nano particle platform as new, untested, problematic, and that they were very afraid that the vaccine content would behave in ways they had not studied and would end up all over the body; they were just unable to say what would transpire long term in vaccinated persons and were dismayed that the studies were not planned for longer duration of follow-up before put to the public (or even with held form the public)
3)they feared that auto-immune disease would rear its head in the medium to more distant future post vaccine in healthy children and children would be harmed; they feared dose-dependent harms (boosters) and saw in their work that this was not going to be properly studied, certainly not in children and not in adults
4)they feared that children (healthy) could and would be harmed from the mRNA vaccines and could and would die post shot due to the effects of the vaccine; they feared blood clots, bleeding, myocarditis, pericarditis etc. in children and stated this to me; they were very angry for they felt with certainty, that there would be deaths in normal healthy children post the injection, and due to the injection; based on their own immunology/virology/vaccinology background, they felt strongly enough to state this to me at that time
5)they were angered as to why the proper safety studies were not done for children, infants to teens etc.; they were very angered as to the liability protection afforded to the vaccine makers and all involved except adult and children vaccinees; they felt this had to be removed so that children could have some tort protections
6) they felt strongly that healthy children were not candidates for the mRNA vaccine (any COVID vaccine) given the vanishingly low risk of severe outcomes post infection; they felt that their own employers and agencies were reckless and dangerous as to children safety
7)they feared proper adverse effect surveillance would not be performed and this would be devastating on safety
8)they felt that the functional innate immune system that protects children would be damaged and destroyed by the mRNA vaccines because there was no study, and their own understanding and study at that point was raising serious concerns of subversion of the innate immune system; they were angered as to why the vaccine companies were not studying antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) which they felt was a real risk and very probable
9)they were very very concerned about the safety of children if they were given the mRNA vaccines; they felt there were too many safety concerns
10)they did not understand why the push was purely vaccines at the demise of early treatment; they felt that the vaccine should only be relegated to special high risk populations, in their words, approximately 5-8% of the US population (high risk elderly over 75 etc. with medical conditions as well as any relevant high risk groups); at that time, they were of the belief that the vaccines should be promoted or offered to high-risk persons and not demanded or made policy or mandated
11)at that time, they were already very concerned about the mRNA vaccines driving viral immune escape and the risk of variants emerging due to the vaccines, for they admitted that they would be rolling out vaccine based on the legacy strain (that was already baked in as part of OWS) with no intent of adjusting the spike protein; they knew that the future as they said, would be variants and this was one of their gravest concerns; they felt there was the risk of more infectious and hotter variants; they tacitly admitted that the epidemic/pandemic would not be tamed by the vaccines once escape variants emerged that were resistant to the vaccinal antibodies (legacy strain). At that time they were already predicting. They were already understanding that this would be a very serious issue. At that time the roll-out was still 6 or 7 months away but they were speculating based on their (and my) own knowledge of immunology/virology/vaccinology, given they identified as having direct involvement and expertise.
My take away from our very sensitive near secretive discussions was anger on their part as to why children (as was their understanding) were not included in any of the ongoing studies (or planned) yet were being discussed definitively as being candidates (as well as pregnant women or persons recovered from COVID or elderly persons). They were angered that children brought little if any risk to the table and were not candidates for the vaccine (then or in the future) yet their agencies and vaccine pharma companies were steam-rolling ahead. They wanted me to know there were many like them in their agencies and pharma companies who were angered and concerned but were very very scared for safety and careers and income loss. They constantly praised me for what I was doing in standing up yet admitted they could not. I pleaded with them to come forward but they would not.