White House still at this time not ruling terrorism 'in' or 'out' as to the car that exploded at Ranbow bridge Canada US border; there is something we are not being told here
High level police sources say this is an attempted terrorist attack. Sources say the car was full of explosives. Both men inside dead. IMO, I think we are being lied to...
Alexander COVID News-Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
So many people, other than terrorists, have a tendency to drive around with explosives in their car. Sure that seems reasonable. 🤦♀️ I’m going with the first responders initial assessment. That always tends to lead to the truth if you can remember what the initial impressions were. It is usually an uncontrolled initial assessment that the government will redirect from to get the narrative they want the media to carry. The same thing happened with 9/11/2001, it also looks like what happened with the JFK assassination by recent statements from doctors that worked on him that day. The government doesn’t want a terror attack the day before a national holiday. They don’t want more problems at home now that they have allowed two wars to start in just a few years. They don’t want to acknowledge just how many terrorists they invited in under the guise of asylum. They have many many reasons to lie, to redirect attention, to change the story to nothing. It’s not nothing, it wasn’t a car with a stuck accelerator, it wasn’t just an accident... with all the verifiable lies the government has told in just the last 3.5 years I don’t understand those that still try to give them or MSM (their partner in crime) the benefit of the doubt. They are lying, the question is why, what are they trying to cover up?
right before the US Thanksgiving when millions will be traveling...what is this a distraction from?
So many people, other than terrorists, have a tendency to drive around with explosives in their car. Sure that seems reasonable. 🤦♀️ I’m going with the first responders initial assessment. That always tends to lead to the truth if you can remember what the initial impressions were. It is usually an uncontrolled initial assessment that the government will redirect from to get the narrative they want the media to carry. The same thing happened with 9/11/2001, it also looks like what happened with the JFK assassination by recent statements from doctors that worked on him that day. The government doesn’t want a terror attack the day before a national holiday. They don’t want more problems at home now that they have allowed two wars to start in just a few years. They don’t want to acknowledge just how many terrorists they invited in under the guise of asylum. They have many many reasons to lie, to redirect attention, to change the story to nothing. It’s not nothing, it wasn’t a car with a stuck accelerator, it wasn’t just an accident... with all the verifiable lies the government has told in just the last 3.5 years I don’t understand those that still try to give them or MSM (their partner in crime) the benefit of the doubt. They are lying, the question is why, what are they trying to cover up?