Why did Malone sue Dr. Peter Breggin & his wife Ginger? There was no basis and the court had to slap Malone but you need to ask yourself serious questions about this little man & the harm he did Dr.
Breggin, the stress, the torment to sue Breggin for 25 million? Did Malone not get enough tax payer money with those research grants? why did he have to sue Ruby? I still do not get it...someone help
I sure hope Breggin soon sues him in response and cleans him out financially, puts Malone on the street begging for food, that is what he continuously tries to do good people who simply ask him questions about the bogus deadly mRNA technology he created. Or so he said.
Malone works closely with government. He says so himself in a video from November 8, 2021.
https://danielnagase.substack.com/p/discrepancy-analysis
At the heart of the Malone/Breggin rift lies Mattias Desmet, whose bogus theories-- circulating once again!-- serve to cloak the true operation of a totalitarian movement, and that operation is censorship/propaganda.
Desmet instead says that totalitarianism begins in the mechanistic thinking of we, the people. He thus obscures the fact that we're not by-and-large mechanistic thinkers and also the fact that totalitarianism begins in censorship.
I've always wondered why Desmet's theory was so widely passed around, when at careful reading it's so blatantly pseudoscience. The Breggins saw this right off the bat, as did many others.
Types of censorship-- let's begin to name them:
Of speech
Science
Bank accounts (remember the Canadian truckers?)
Protests (January 6)
Agriculture (see Europe)
Freedom of movement
Elections
Totalitarianism begins in censorship. Desmet says the opposite. Desmet's ideas serve to cloak the true operation. Malone was a heavy promoter of Desmet.