Why did the mRNA vaccine makers (Moderna, Pfizer, BioNTech) & its CEOs Bancel, Bourla, Sahin & the mRNA technology inventors Malone, Weissman, Kariko & others involved remain silent knowing there was

never enough time in the so called 'trials' to show it worked, was safe, or effective? Why did they wait until after roll-out (way after)? Silent on reverse transcription, leaving injection site, not

dissolving as we were told, and persisting long-term maybe life-long? Why did they remain silent on the fact that your cells after mRNA vaccine produce spike protein literally 24/7 for the rest of your life? Why? When they knew (had to know as this was their area of research) also that to package the mRNA payload inside the lipid nano particle fatty lipid ball was so that the fatty ball can act as a molecular transporter to take the mRNA deep and far inside the body and NOT stay at injection site? Why? That it could not stay at the injection site so why did Malone stay silent on this when many looked at the silence as ‘ok’ and took the shot and died?

They all knew and regardless of who may wish to run to the hills now claiming its harmful, as they seek to get cover in the anti-COVID vaccine movement, they knew way before, for it was their technology, their vaccine and people were being coerced, shamed, mandated, punished into taking it, under threat of loss of income and threat of law. Many people took their lives after it was destroyed being fired and laid off due to wrongful mandates when the vaccine never ever stopped transmission.

It is unforgiveable what Bourla, Bancel, Sahin, Malone, Weissman, Kariko et al. did and partook in. If shown as it will be, that these mRNA technology vaccines killed as we see it is and has, I think these people must be fully investigated and held to account in proper courts of law, with judges and juries operating via the legal process. History must record them as the malfeasants they would be if they stood silent as people were coerced and lied to about the vaccine and they knew. We need to know who knew what and when and why were they silent. We need to know why they were silent as people took the shots and got sick and died and how come they could profit off of it and operate as if they had/have nothing to do with the deaths.

The death of people rests in their laps.

You the readers here, the public, stood strong and critically thought about the issues and the evidence in front of you and said no. You weighed the benefits versus the harms. Upsides versus downsides. Many were not that strong and did not do the depth of reflection you did, and the analysis. They did not and they died. SADLY. Why then should someone like Malone who has grifted on tax payer money all his life as a research grant expert so to speak, now benefit on the harms and deaths his work caused? How come Malone and Bourla etc. are allowed to profit and talk as if all is well when they partook in the deaths of people? Makes no sense to me. What am I missing?