'Would you like a turbo cancer with that? The "Turbo Cancer is a myth" myth is a low point even for Big Pharma and their pseudoscience cronies.' very interesting scholarship by Arkmedic's blog, worth
the read; “Turbo Cancer” would be embedded in the oncologists lexicon from old? In fact the first mentions were coming from twitter towards end of 2022 and beginning of 2023. Here is Dr Charles Hoffe
Would you like a turbo cancer with that?
Start here, this scholarship, well done, share please, credit writer, support:
‘Although it might have been quiet on this substack for a few weeks there has been a lot of activity in the background which takes time to collate, and so here we are.
Today’s article is hopefully going to answer the question about whether "Turbo Cancer” (a) exists and (b) is a consequence, or possible consequence of the imposition of a genetic vaccine platform on the global population.
Turbo Cancer is a Myth: Wikipedia
The first thing that need clearing up is “where did the Turbo Cancer phrase come from?”
If you’re in the field you might think this is a made up term but it really exemplifies the idea of a rapidly progressive cancer, that is one that is progressing or spreading much faster than you would be used to. Most oncologists know how the cancers they treat progress and so can give you an idea of what to expect. A prostate cancer in an elderly person for instance would normally take years to progress, so getting growing secondaries in a few months would be unusual. Similarly for a small breast cancer that was surgically removed or treated with radiotherapy which would be expected to be cured with the first line of treatment.
So you would think “Turbo Cancer” would be embedded in the oncologists lexicon from old, but it isn’t. In fact the first mentions were coming from twitter towards the end of 2022 and beginning of 2023. Here is Dr Charles Hoffe talking about it back in January 2023 as a relatively new phenomenon.
Now Charles is a family doctor rather than an oncologist, but there were certainly oncologists noticing a pattern of rapidly progressive cancers around that time, such as the highly respected Angus Dalgleish who was basically forced out of his position for talking about it, and more recently James Royle a colorectal surgeon who clearly laid out the evolution of this new phenomenon on John Campbell’s Youtube channel here
Here’s Angus Dalgleish talking about it in more depth on Sky News on the 24th November here
So if it wasn’t a term in common use in oncology (it still doesn’t appear on PubMed) and oncologists were talking about it in early 2023, surely it’s actually a thing? Well not according to Wikipedia. Here’s what it says as of today:
Ah, well that seals it then. It’s an “anti-vaccination conspiracy theory”. Because wikipedia articles like this are written by oncologists and scientists aren’t they?
Well here is the author, Guy Chapman, moose knuckle included.
He has a
The Big Guns Roll In
Presumably the discussions on twitter sparked the interest of the pharma cartel because Helen Petousis-Harris (New Zealand’s chief “vaccinologist”) soon rolled up in her Pfizer sponsored virtual Bentley to debunk us all by creating a new substack account just to embarrass us all on our own turf. Then fell completely flat on her face.
So, who is Helen Petousis-Harris?
And here she is explaining the mechanism of action with those fluffy and friendly lipid nanoparticles (the things that get the RNA - and the residual DNA that they forgot to clean up - directly into your cells) but failing to mention that transfection (the delivery of foreign genetic material into your cells
The Merieux foundation credit themselves with the Brazilian meningitis vaccination drive in 1974 failing to remember that meningitis cases and deaths
So what does the data say?
There are only two options in this space, either Helen Petousis-Vaccinology and her cronies with their pharma sponsored diplomas are correct, or there is a real risk of cancer related to the genetic vaccine platform.
That’s right. They did absolutely nothing. Actually worse than nothing because they
That’s it. Carry on. Nothing to see here. And no safety monitoring.
The Australian Bureau of (Lies, Damned Lies and) Statistics
·
December 4, 2022
And independent analyst
To make this problem even harder to solve, no country provides real time cancer data.
As you can see from the graph, which looks at only the events in the hospital statistics that are
Now don’t you just feel safe?
Is it plausible that mRNA vaccines cause cancer?
So putting this another way, the question you should be asking, knowing now that the regulators never test for carcinogenicity (the ability of a drug to induce cancer)…
Well, there is “no evidence” because you specifically didn’t look for it.
Mini-me update
·
October 7, 2023
And just to reinforce the point here is a slide from
And what are those mechanisms?
And if you really want to know how complex this can be our friend
On that slide is just
And yes, again, it’s a gene therapy. The
"Turbo cancer is a myth" is fake news written by a guy who has no qualifications to write it.
There are a myriad of mechanisms for the COVID genetic vaccines to cause cancer or accelerate existing cancer.
The presence of plasmid DNA contamination is the most important factor making these therapies high risk for cancer.
The authorities are not looking for increases in cancer incidence but the data that exist shows that cancers have increased already.
High profile scientists are brought out to suppress this information but without any knowledge of the mechanisms involvedDon’t take our word for it
Although genetic therapies don’t need to change your DNA to have their effect, the presence of such massive
And yet again, I don’t want you just to take my word for this - the pharma corporations
And not only did they know about this problem (well this is just one mechanism, there are so many others) they deliberately hid it by hiding the dangerous parts of the plasmid map (the blueprint for making the RNA) that they submitted to the regulators in every country. It’s not even an accident - you can’t generate these maps from standard software without them
Furthermore, the plasmid contamination problem that Pfizer tried to hide in this way was known about by the FDA two decades ago.
That’s right. Ignoring the fact that
But Helen Petousis-Harris says vaccines prevent cancers!
Well now we know what we know let’s go back to the NZ Queen of vaccinology’s statement above:
So I guess in one way she is right. If you don’t look for cancers and hide your head in the sand you won’t find them. This has a legal term -
Yet we recently found out the true character of Petousis-Harris after a
…following which she promptly deleted her twitter account then reactivated her account later with a change of name to the ridiculous “Trash Trawler”. No I’m not kidding (you can trace twitter accounts by various methods to show it’s the same account).
This single unnecessary and ridiculous act demonstrated that Helen Petousis-Harris was prepared to fabricate an article to get her way and totally vindicates Dr Sin Han Lee.
And of course the GVDN finds that the COVID vaccines are perfectly safe. Which might have something to do with the fact that the GVDN is part of the “Vaccine Safety Net” which is another conglomerate of organisations that include the “Vaccine Confidence Project” whose
And the reason that we know that the GVDN data,
In case you don’t know why that’s a problem you would have to read the last article about synthetic data sets curated and cleaned by pharma companies and regurgitated by academics who have no idea whether they are fake or not.
Pharma Hell on Earth: The Odyssey of Surgisphere
·
December 15, 2024
Anyway, back to our GVDN chief Helen. Here she is in 2021 on mainstream TV telling the population that despite people dying after the vaccine it’s not related to the vaccine. Because there is no chance that any of these vaccinologists will admit that any vaccine may cause deaths. [2:19]
But the “Global Vaccine Data Network” is totally superfluous and seems to be an obvious front for Pharma, who can use it to push their cleaned up version of thae
So on one hand we have Helen Petousis-Harris’s GSK-backed groups telling us that there are no deaths from COVID vaccines. And on the other the official VAERS data reporting portal telling us that there are at least 50x the number of death reports made to official government reporting portals. I wonder who we should believe?
And in the cancer section, just to reaffirm that the author (Helen) doesn’t actually understand this (and why she deleted her tweets and then twitter account) she quotes this graph to “prove that there is no increase in cancers” (contrary to the ABS and AIHW data that I have shown).
It looks like a slam dunk for Helen except for the fact that she didn’t read the bit on the right of her own graph that says
Yet here is the actual death certificate data (the only other up-to-date cancer related data available) sourced from the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
So we have multiple official source data telling us that there has been a significant increase in cancer incidence and cancer deaths since 2021, and the only source telling us that there isn’t is controlled by Pharma and some guy with a moose knuckle.
Well according to
… and the irony of this whitewashing of the COVID vaccine and turbo cancers question became stark just a few months later when Adele died at 44 of what appears to be a very rapidly progressive cancer. Bear in mind that it is very unusual to succumb so quickly to cancer in this age group because of their ability to tolerate the most aggressive treatments.
The frustration of course is that those of us that are trying to find out why there is a sudden increase in cancers, particularly in the small but significant number of rapidly progressive cancers reported, are thwarted by the very groups that are supposed to be independent.
“But vaccines prevent cancer - look at HPV and Hepatitis”
In this last section I’m just going to address this common call from the “vaccinologists” armed with their 2-week diplomas. To remind you I’ll requote our Helen from earlier.
Would you like Plasmids with that?
·
October 17, 2024
So it’s not enough to say “this treatment prevents death from road accidents in the Amazon forest” if it increases your risk of death from snake bites.
The arguments for the lack of significant impact to date of the HPV vaccine are too complex for this article but it just goes to show that preventing cancer is multi-factorial and not as simple as people like Larry Ellison or Tedros might think. For instance if reliance on HPV vaccination has the effect of discouraging screening (which is
Note that this information is buried in the supplementary data, it’s not front and centre. And note also that this is a similar bait-and-switch that we showed the pharma companies pulling in the
Are Turbo Cancers Real Then?
Well I think there is enough information in this article for you to have made a decision on this. That comes down to whether you believe the sparse data that the government are unable to hide against the data that you are freely given but is underpinned by the very corporations that make the drugs.
Archived https://archive.md/kd8Fa.
Archived https://archive.md/5JrWy
In Nazi Germany (and many other collectivist regimes) the public is sold on the idea that healthcare and security will be included as part of the package. For your safety. Because if you give you autonomy up to the government they will look after you, obviously.
https://www.pressreader.com/usa/the-saline-couriereEf37/20210107/281590948195714
AIHW collated data include R code to collate from AIHW DRG data cube files (need to be saved as csv for each year with name AIHW_DRG_yyyy.csv)
Aihw Separations 2015 2022
397KB ∙ XLSX file
Archived https://archive.md/MRFlO
Full conversation with references here
https://chatgpt.com/share/679dc20f-ab94-8005-942b-0ab63d1710f2
'
___
You must not wait for another catastrophic crisis (at times manufactured but we are prevented from making our own basic personal decisions or accessing needed drugs and response tools) to catch you off-guard. We must take charge and be prepared today so that we can enjoy peace of mind tomorrow.
Enter the Wellness Company as a solution and a willing participant in the health care conversation. From telemedicine, prescriptions, memberships, and supplements, TWC is leading America with alternative choices to the traditional health care model.
If you wish to give a donation to help me, you can at:
Zelle:
sr7283@gmail.com
Or Ko-Fi
Ko-fi.com/drpauleliasalexander
Or to my address at:
150 South 8th Street
Unit 170
Lewiston, New York
14092
Alternatively, please consider going from an UNPAID subscriber or follower to a PAID at $5 per month or $30 per year. This can provide me help. If this is not possible at this time, this is ok, please remain a subscriber for FREE and there is no difference between FREE and PAID. No restrictions.
Please consider support of a good PATRIOT company (in this PATRIOT economy) Drs. McCullough, Risch, Thorp, myself support (they are our sponsors), The Wellness Company; see the emergency preparation kit (key component being antibiotics you were denied by doctors, pharmacists, governments during the fraud COVID), first aid kit, travel emergency kit, contagion control kit etc. Please consider the SPIKE SUPPORT (spike protein DETOX dissolving spike from mRNA vaccine, this is critical to remove spike form the mRNA vaccine/and DNA viral vector) formula with NATTOKINASE as well as the triple formula (SPIKE SUPPORT, BROMELAIN, CIRCUMIN)
Sometimes where I was living young ladies from other parts of the world would want to walk from a lighthouse back to the nightclub strip after a swim in the surf after the sun had set. And, being a gentleman, I would offer to give them a lift. It was a scenic route for a leisurely stroll. But the place had a dark side that the council and the press and the big hotels didn't advertise. I would gently chide them: "You can go out walking in this place and 99 times out of 100 you will not get raped and murdered. That one time cancels out the other 99."
Perhaps 99% of what Trump has done is good. There's just that 1% that's not and in that 1% is the Trump-Malone mRNA turbocancer death shot that Trump urges people to take.
Thanks for sharing this Dr. Alexander. Wow! and Wow! The article puts the nail in the coffin and it really angers me how so many ignorant highly educated people in authority abused their authority out of pure arrogance by passing on propaganda, misinformation, and outright Big Pharma and Big Health Agency lies which has ultimately harmed the long term health of tens of millions of human beings.