Unfortunately they don’t budge from narrative, like. “Large clinical trials of both BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 in more than 70,000 individuals in the United States showed good safety profiles for both of the mRNA-based vaccines and no reports of myocarditis”, or “They’re effective and myocarditis is rare.”
This is one of the most embarassing fact check articles I've seen this week. They are complaining that some of the studies are repeated under multiple headings.. give me a break!
Unfortunately they don’t budge from narrative, like. “Large clinical trials of both BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 in more than 70,000 individuals in the United States showed good safety profiles for both of the mRNA-based vaccines and no reports of myocarditis”, or “They’re effective and myocarditis is rare.”
Only a thousand...?
Viruganda will dismiss...
Where do we go to watch your meeting today Dr?
This is one of the most embarassing fact check articles I've seen this week. They are complaining that some of the studies are repeated under multiple headings.. give me a break!
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/feb/17/blog-posting/studies-included-list-do-not-question-covid-19-vac/