20 Comments

Just the tip of the iceberg, with our youth getting vaccinated.

Hopefully more join Denmark in banning this practice.

Expand full comment

You can bet Canada will be the last on that bandwagon ! We are in the hands of 'unelected' scientists of some sort, while we have brilliant scientists like Dr. Alexander and Dr. Bridle who know the score and are pleading for an end to these perilous inoculations. Both of them are risking their reputations and careers trying to wake up masses of the compliant.

Expand full comment

We already KNOW Vax'ing kids will not save lives, but cost lives of our children:

https://timellison.substack.com/p/killing-our-children-ii

Expand full comment

The paper's abstract states 'The clinical presentation of myopericarditis after vaccination was usually mild, with all cases fully recovering within 14 days.' This is important information too.

My nephew was diagnosed with pericarditis 2 days post Novavax. 3 months on colchicine, symptoms abated, then returned. He'll be back to the cardiologist next week.

Interpret the 'fully recovered' bit cautiously.

Expand full comment

Conclusion: "Hence, adolescents receiving mRNA vaccines should be monitored for side effects."

Why, so we can keep tidy records?

The only proper conclusion is adolescents should not be jabbed!

Expand full comment

The military academies should closely monitor these cadets/Mids closely; TPTB are the reason these healthy & conditioned youngster were subjected to these killer shots. But they won’t UNLESS parents & alumni raise holy hell

Expand full comment

Agree !

Meanwhile parents have opted out of proper parenting as far as I'm concerned....to the point of child abuse when submitting their children to these EXPERIMENTAL and unnecessary (by any stretch of the imagination) shots !

Expand full comment

So children’s health defense email put out a list today which included a study of Brazil and Scotland of effectiveness of shots of 11-17 years olds. Amazing this is what we consider science . It’s here in the lancet

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00451-0/fulltext?rss=yes

So I realized they didn’t include the overall vaccination rate of the entire population in this age group . Instead they simply looked at how many tests what were the results and if they were jabbed and when . From this they deduce what the effectiveness is . Also they didn’t not include what the confounders might be .

At any rate I looked at the charts snd noticed they didn’t add up all the tests in the various section of jabbed by date . Which I did . 380/182185. Overall 0.208 had severe covid ( or were in the hospital with covid). As opposed to the 0.9% on the unvaccinated in hospital with covid . From this they conclude that it’s more effective for severe covid .

But I was then wondering what the ratio was of those that took tests in comparison to the vaccination rate for this age group . 23175/182185

So 12.7% of the tests were amongst unvaccinated and 87.3% were jabbed. I could only find the total Brazil rate which is ……drum roll …86%. Now we know that in a population the lowest will be the younger group. Do I would like a real number but it’s safe to say that the results of the study demonstrate that the tests do not reflect the actual vaccination rate . The US reports in the age category 69% jab rate . It doesn’t change the overall study presentation by much . What is really missing is what are the confounders. We only know that of the tests in hospital of the unvaccinated 0.9% were positive and on average 0.2% were vaccinated . From this some idiot will reduce that the unvaccinated are 4.5 times more likely to have severe covid if infected !

Expand full comment

If they're incompetent enough, and malicious enough, to kill people, we can safely and effectively conclude they will be incompetent enough, and malicious enough, to mislead/lie about it.

Expand full comment

Children are now lab rats.

Expand full comment

Best analogies I have heard are that the virus is the delivery system and the experimental gene transfer therapy injection is the payload. Using a WWII timeline analogy for COVID, we haven’t even reached D-Day yet. Long way to go.

Expand full comment

It is just ridiculous that these jabs are still being pushed and the media and so called scientists ignore the obvious side effects. Just shameful and evil. I still hear commercials for boosters.

Expand full comment

This is so they can drag you into agreeing to have stents put in your arteries at $30K a pop. That's what they do for many heart problems. Then when those fail, you get the $100k grafting surgery. And on it goes.

Expand full comment

THANK YOU!

I've download, read the paper. Am passing it on to my doc and others.

Expand full comment

The UK Government DATA show that the All-Cause-Mortality-Rate is a factor of 2 higher for the Vax'd than the Un-Vax'd:

https://timellison.substack.com/p/follow-up-2-on-i-hope-there-is-nothing

Expand full comment

All recovered after 14dsys according to abstract. Is there sufficient evidence? Possible Subclinical methodological detection limitations? Perhaps authors conduct annual self report health surveys on these subjects for 5 years?

Expand full comment

I keep trying, but so many have become deaf and resolutely demand everyone at their wedding be vaccinated...

Expand full comment

Reuters: Novartis reports Zolgensma caused two deaths from liver failure

Novartis AG (NOVN.S) on Thursday reported two patient fatalities due to acute liver failure following treatment with Zolgensma gene therapy used to treat spinal muscular atrophy.

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/novartis-reports-zolgensma-caused-two-deaths-liver-failure-2022-08-11/

Expand full comment
deletedAug 11, 2022·edited Aug 11, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

"Cardiovascular effects in 88 out of 301 - 1 of every 88 school-age kids with bleak future ahead."

Isn't this, 1 of every 3.4, or, 3 of every 10?

Expand full comment