June 7, 2024: The 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals just ruled in favor of protecting individual human rights and bodily sovereignty of teachers and other staff of the Los Angeles School Unified District’s (LAUSD), reversing a lower court’s dismissal of their case against the LA County’s School District vaccine mandate for employees.
June 7, 2024: The 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals just ruled in favor of protecting individual human rights and bodily sovereignty of teachers and other staff of the Los Angeles School Unified District’s (LAUSD), reversing a lower court’s dismissal of their case against the LA County’s School District vaccine mandate for employees.
Announcing this huge win on behalf of their clients, Health Freedom Defense Fund issued a press release, stating that the case was won;
“On the merits, the majority ruled that the district court had misapplied the Supreme Court’s 1905 decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts when it dismissed LAUSD’s lawsuit on grounds that the mandate was rationally related to a legitimate state interest. In Jacobson, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a smallpox vaccination mandate because it related to “preventing the spread” of smallpox.
The majority, however, noted that HFDF had alleged in the lawsuit that the COVID jabs are not “traditional” vaccines because they do not prevent the spread of COVID-19 but only purport to mitigate COVID symptoms in the recipient. This, HFDF had alleged in its complaint, makes the COVID jab a medical treatment, not a vaccine.
The court recognized that mitigating symptoms rather than preventing the spread of disease “distinguishes Jacobson, thus presenting a different government interest.” Based on this reasoning, the majority disapproved the trial court’s contention that, even if the jabs do not prevent the spread, “Jacobson still dictates that the vaccine mandate is subject to, and survives, the rational basis test.”
The court held that “[t]his misapplies Jacobson,” which “did not involve a claim in which the compelled vaccine was ‘designed to reduce symptoms in the infected vaccine recipient rather than to prevent transmission and infection.”’ Jacobson does not, the majority concluded, extend to “forced medical treatment” for the benefit of the recipient.”
When HFDF asked the court to opine as to whether or not the CDC’s claim that the COVID-19 vaccines were ‘safe and effective’, the court responded with the rhetorical question, “safe and effective for what?”
Legal Precedent for U.S. Citizens to Deny Medical Treatment
Per the HFDF press release, “Judge Collins wrote that the district court “further erred by failing to realize that [HFDF’s] allegations directly implicate a distinct and more recent line of Supreme Court authority” for the proposition that “a competent person has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted medical treatment[.]” Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Washington v. Glucksberg, Judge Collins noted that the right to refuse unwanted medical treatment is “entirely consistent with this Nation’s history and constitutional traditions,” and that HFDF’s allegations in this case “are sufficient to invoke that fundamental right.”
The Kingston Report
A Legal Precedent is a LEGAL "Rule Of Law from God". It cannot be bought or suppressed.
A forced medical treatment which BionTech/Pfizer said should have been licensed as a Gene Therapy Injection (2015) and which targets the Dentric Cells in the Lymph Nodes (2023) - but what for?
Thank you for posting this …. I was going to do it as well in response to posts about “precedent” … this was a huge win especially in California (side note - did you see the crowd and reception in SC gathering in support for 45! Have been praying for him to come to the west coast for years!) and I believe changes the precedent. Additionally, there’s a woman I follow who’s got a stack - Peggy Hall The Healthy American. She and her pastor husband have been helping people navigate legally / constitutionally and through religious freedom all the evil over the past 4 years. She’s got a ton of videos / podcasts etc
The Judges interpretation of the vaccines is similar to Australian Law with regards to the Rights to refuse a vaccine as a medical procedure, which the Judge defines the Covid vaccines to be. The Judge must know of the Australian Law, which is probably similar to similar English and other Laws pertaining to an individual's Rights to refuse a vaccine and brings the American interpretation in line with the Australian and other Laws regarding vaccines as a medical procedure.
Smallpox in 1905 represented a much more severe threat because the vaccines in 2020 did nothing to stop or contain Covid, which was supposed to be their purpose and in fact the Judge says that in his clarification:
In Jacobson, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a "smallpox vaccination mandate" because it related to “preventing the spread” of smallpox.
the COVID jabs are not “traditional” vaccines because they "do not prevent the spread" of COVID-19 but only purport to "mitigate COVID symptoms in the recipient". This, HFDF had alleged in its complaint, makes the COVID jab a "medical treatment", not a vaccine.
Thus The 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals "just ruled" in favor of protecting individual human rights and bodily sovereignty of teachers and other staff of the Los Angeles School Unified District’s (LAUSD) by allowing them to refuse to be vaccinated by the "COVID jab a medical treatment, not a vaccine". - just the same as Australian Law - which I have published in my substack.
Pfizer and the FDA have provided more incriminating evidence validating HFDF’s accurate claim that COVID-19 injections are not vaccines and in fact, cause SARS-CoV-2 infection in previously healthy children and adults.
Pfizer FDA Study Confirms: 75% of Boosted Children and 72% of Boosted Adults are COVID-19 Infected...
Pfizer FDA Study Confirms that 75% of Boosted Children are COVID-19 Infected
Healthy children were not at high risk for COVID-19 infection. This is more incriminating Pfizer data confirming that the COVID-19 mRNA injections cause infection and are NOT vaccines.
Karen Kingston
Now a forced medical treatment which BionTech/Pfizer said should have been licensed as a Gene Therapy Injection (2015) and which targets the Dentric Cells in the Lymph Nodes (2023) - but what for?
But here is a problem - future vaccines are now as per ”June 7, 2024: The 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals just ruled are "forced medical treatment" and the CDC’s claim that the vaccines are ‘safe and effective’, the court responded with the rhetorical question, “safe and effective for what?” which makes all "vaccines" illegal, by definition and purpose.
As an add on - it seems to me that everyone who volunteered to a vaccine agreed to be Euthanised and that is their purpose - ModRNA DNA Made in a laboratory and Patented by US Law 2013 (not "Natural mRNA DNA" which by US Law 2013 cannot be patented): ModRNA DNA Patented and injected humans are now genetically modified to produce "protein" toxins that their own body tries to destroy
Ever heard the term auto-immune disorder? If not, you will very soon, and quite often. It starts with even the healthiest people, who got brainwashed by the Pharma cartel into getting the toxic "forever" jab, where human cells are tricked into producing virus-mimicking "protein" prions, that are produced indefinitely (counter to medical narratives) and spread throughout the body. This signals the human immune system that every organ is under attack by foreign invaders, and the immune system is taxed, hyper-activated constantly, and the heart and CNS start breaking down too.
Just like GM corn and GM soy, the Covid-jab-injected human's DNA system is now a toxic protein creating factory, but instead of killing insects and worms, the human body is destroying itself. In other words, the "pest" is itself, and the immune system identifies it this way. Still wondering why the Covid-vaxxed masses keep dropping like flies, from unexplainable heart attacks, spontaneous abortions and stroke-inducing fibrous vascular clots?
These ModRNA DNA-injected humans are now walking bio-weapons factories, and their doctors are never allowed to discuss it. The medical industry has every employee parroting and regurgitating all the false-narratives (disinformation) about how the ModRNA DNA remains at the site of injection, and how it only produces spike proteins for a few months. Lies. Does the genetically modified corn and soy only produce worm-exterminating proteins for a few weeks? This deserves careful consideration.
June 7, 2024: The 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals just ruled in favor of protecting individual human rights and bodily sovereignty of teachers and other staff of the Los Angeles School Unified District’s (LAUSD), reversing a lower court’s dismissal of their case against the LA County’s School District vaccine mandate for employees.
Announcing this huge win on behalf of their clients, Health Freedom Defense Fund issued a press release, stating that the case was won;
“On the merits, the majority ruled that the district court had misapplied the Supreme Court’s 1905 decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts when it dismissed LAUSD’s lawsuit on grounds that the mandate was rationally related to a legitimate state interest. In Jacobson, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a smallpox vaccination mandate because it related to “preventing the spread” of smallpox.
The majority, however, noted that HFDF had alleged in the lawsuit that the COVID jabs are not “traditional” vaccines because they do not prevent the spread of COVID-19 but only purport to mitigate COVID symptoms in the recipient. This, HFDF had alleged in its complaint, makes the COVID jab a medical treatment, not a vaccine.
The court recognized that mitigating symptoms rather than preventing the spread of disease “distinguishes Jacobson, thus presenting a different government interest.” Based on this reasoning, the majority disapproved the trial court’s contention that, even if the jabs do not prevent the spread, “Jacobson still dictates that the vaccine mandate is subject to, and survives, the rational basis test.”
The court held that “[t]his misapplies Jacobson,” which “did not involve a claim in which the compelled vaccine was ‘designed to reduce symptoms in the infected vaccine recipient rather than to prevent transmission and infection.”’ Jacobson does not, the majority concluded, extend to “forced medical treatment” for the benefit of the recipient.”
When HFDF asked the court to opine as to whether or not the CDC’s claim that the COVID-19 vaccines were ‘safe and effective’, the court responded with the rhetorical question, “safe and effective for what?”
Legal Precedent for U.S. Citizens to Deny Medical Treatment
Per the HFDF press release, “Judge Collins wrote that the district court “further erred by failing to realize that [HFDF’s] allegations directly implicate a distinct and more recent line of Supreme Court authority” for the proposition that “a competent person has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted medical treatment[.]” Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Washington v. Glucksberg, Judge Collins noted that the right to refuse unwanted medical treatment is “entirely consistent with this Nation’s history and constitutional traditions,” and that HFDF’s allegations in this case “are sufficient to invoke that fundamental right.”
The Kingston Report
A Legal Precedent is a LEGAL "Rule Of Law from God". It cannot be bought or suppressed.
A forced medical treatment which BionTech/Pfizer said should have been licensed as a Gene Therapy Injection (2015) and which targets the Dentric Cells in the Lymph Nodes (2023) - but what for?
Thank you for posting this …. I was going to do it as well in response to posts about “precedent” … this was a huge win especially in California (side note - did you see the crowd and reception in SC gathering in support for 45! Have been praying for him to come to the west coast for years!) and I believe changes the precedent. Additionally, there’s a woman I follow who’s got a stack - Peggy Hall The Healthy American. She and her pastor husband have been helping people navigate legally / constitutionally and through religious freedom all the evil over the past 4 years. She’s got a ton of videos / podcasts etc
The Judges interpretation of the vaccines is similar to Australian Law with regards to the Rights to refuse a vaccine as a medical procedure, which the Judge defines the Covid vaccines to be. The Judge must know of the Australian Law, which is probably similar to similar English and other Laws pertaining to an individual's Rights to refuse a vaccine and brings the American interpretation in line with the Australian and other Laws regarding vaccines as a medical procedure.
Smallpox in 1905 represented a much more severe threat because the vaccines in 2020 did nothing to stop or contain Covid, which was supposed to be their purpose and in fact the Judge says that in his clarification:
In Jacobson, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a "smallpox vaccination mandate" because it related to “preventing the spread” of smallpox.
the COVID jabs are not “traditional” vaccines because they "do not prevent the spread" of COVID-19 but only purport to "mitigate COVID symptoms in the recipient". This, HFDF had alleged in its complaint, makes the COVID jab a "medical treatment", not a vaccine.
Thus The 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals "just ruled" in favor of protecting individual human rights and bodily sovereignty of teachers and other staff of the Los Angeles School Unified District’s (LAUSD) by allowing them to refuse to be vaccinated by the "COVID jab a medical treatment, not a vaccine". - just the same as Australian Law - which I have published in my substack.
Pfizer and the FDA have provided more incriminating evidence validating HFDF’s accurate claim that COVID-19 injections are not vaccines and in fact, cause SARS-CoV-2 infection in previously healthy children and adults.
Pfizer FDA Study Confirms: 75% of Boosted Children and 72% of Boosted Adults are COVID-19 Infected...
Pfizer FDA Study Confirms that 75% of Boosted Children are COVID-19 Infected
Healthy children were not at high risk for COVID-19 infection. This is more incriminating Pfizer data confirming that the COVID-19 mRNA injections cause infection and are NOT vaccines.
Karen Kingston
Now a forced medical treatment which BionTech/Pfizer said should have been licensed as a Gene Therapy Injection (2015) and which targets the Dentric Cells in the Lymph Nodes (2023) - but what for?
But here is a problem - future vaccines are now as per ”June 7, 2024: The 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals just ruled are "forced medical treatment" and the CDC’s claim that the vaccines are ‘safe and effective’, the court responded with the rhetorical question, “safe and effective for what?” which makes all "vaccines" illegal, by definition and purpose.
As an add on - it seems to me that everyone who volunteered to a vaccine agreed to be Euthanised and that is their purpose - ModRNA DNA Made in a laboratory and Patented by US Law 2013 (not "Natural mRNA DNA" which by US Law 2013 cannot be patented): ModRNA DNA Patented and injected humans are now genetically modified to produce "protein" toxins that their own body tries to destroy
Ever heard the term auto-immune disorder? If not, you will very soon, and quite often. It starts with even the healthiest people, who got brainwashed by the Pharma cartel into getting the toxic "forever" jab, where human cells are tricked into producing virus-mimicking "protein" prions, that are produced indefinitely (counter to medical narratives) and spread throughout the body. This signals the human immune system that every organ is under attack by foreign invaders, and the immune system is taxed, hyper-activated constantly, and the heart and CNS start breaking down too.
Just like GM corn and GM soy, the Covid-jab-injected human's DNA system is now a toxic protein creating factory, but instead of killing insects and worms, the human body is destroying itself. In other words, the "pest" is itself, and the immune system identifies it this way. Still wondering why the Covid-vaxxed masses keep dropping like flies, from unexplainable heart attacks, spontaneous abortions and stroke-inducing fibrous vascular clots?
These ModRNA DNA-injected humans are now walking bio-weapons factories, and their doctors are never allowed to discuss it. The medical industry has every employee parroting and regurgitating all the false-narratives (disinformation) about how the ModRNA DNA remains at the site of injection, and how it only produces spike proteins for a few months. Lies. Does the genetically modified corn and soy only produce worm-exterminating proteins for a few weeks? This deserves careful consideration.