2nd Smartest Guy in the World reminds me always why he is the 2nd...commenting on Ruby case being thrown out BOOM a won for Jane Ruby, I am so happy! 2nd: Malone is a malignant narcissist and
2nd Smartest Guy in the World reminds me always why he is the 2nd...commenting on Ruby case being thrown out BOOM a won for Jane Ruby, I am so happy! 2nd: Malone is a malignant narcissist and
I have always felt something was odd with Malone . Never liked him from the beginning of this Covid fiasco!
I’m loving your take on him . I always thought he was the controlled opposition .Whenever I saw him speak at these freedom rallies he hogged all the time . Thanks for making me laugh at your take on “ Maloney” Keep up the good work!
How is it you, Dr Paul, and 2nd Smartest, know Malone to be "controlled opposition" and a malignant narcissist? Please explain that. Controlled opposition is when for example, oil companies finance an environmental group against oil. The group wants less oil, more regulation. The upshot is the enviro group gets more regulation, which ends up increasing the price of oil, and making oil cost more. The oil companies then make more money.
What is the situation with Malone that does similar work?
Dr. Paul, who is paying you to write defamatory pieces on Malone? It seems to be the only subject you become foaming at the mouth off the hook over. Otherwise, you are fairly rational, if passionate (no problem with passionate). The CIA?
I am concerned when you, Leah etc. write "Hang 'em high!" Please be careful to not get nailed with "inciting violence." Careful Due Process, first.
Why didn't Malone spent all that lawyer money in leading a class action against social media censoring him and all of us? At least he would have done something real for the cause!
Please tell 2 nd Smartest that he would have a large following if he could take a little criticism ( for me, it was over his goofy friend named Sid ) and stopped censoring his subscribers off his Stack for " a 100 years". That is a long time! Smart, funny guy but perhaps his ego is too fragile? Or perhaps there is another explanation he does not want an open forum on his Stack? Not a fan of Free Speech?
Any response 2nd? We like you, but inquiring minds want to know.
The adult, constructive thing for the Breggins and Dr Malone to do is acknowledge a misunderstanding, talk the issue thru in a non-personal way, and then let it go and continue with the mission of Medical Freedom. Isn't that what scientists do? But if U lob personal attacks at somebody, don't be surprised if they attack U right back. Stick to arguing about-the-facts not about-the-people.
What someone says about others, shows alot about themselves. I like Dr Malone. I like Dr Alexander. I like the 2nd Smartest guy. I think U all have something to add. The bickering is a net negative. If U don't like someone's argument, attack the argument, not the person. You all sound like children.
Malone is so boring. He may be full of himself but he refuses to double down on his mistakes and push the shots. Fauci, Walensky, Birx are where it's at:
"The bureaucratic compulsive displays signs of narcissistic traits alongside the compulsivity. They are champions of tradition, values, and bureaucracy. They cherish organizations that follow hierarchies and feel comforted by definitive roles between subordinates and superiors, and the known expectations and responsibilities. They derive their identity from work and project an image of diligence, reliability, and commitment to their institution. They view work and productivity in a polarized manner; either done or not. They may use their power and status to inflict fear and obedience in their subordinates if they do not strictly follow their rules and procedures, and derive pleasure from the sense of control and power that they acquire by doing so."
I recall Dr Ruby being served a cease and desist letter from Malones lawyer for constant defamation. He asked her to stop putting information out, he said if not she would receive a cease and desist letter. She was called out several times by Dr Ryan Cole for wrong information as well. Malone followed through and she received that letter.
I don’t know what to believe about Malone. The first podcast with Bret Weinstein and Steve Kirsch was very informative. Malone was invited to that Podcast, he spoke up brought awareness of what was known at that time. He took the shots himself and was very ill - and several times since. He’s been involved and met with numerous world renowned credible respected top drs and scientists - Gerrt Vandenboshe, Dr Michael Yeadon, Dr Kory, Dr McCullough, Dr Ryan Cole, Dr Urso, Dr James Thorp, And several others do still share their time and knowledge at numerous live as well as online events.
Malone never had to speak up about anything. He did not ever have to mention his early history of involvement and also how he reported the issues he recognized when mr NA was in development- he stepped away from it many years prior. He was not the only one involved in that development. It was an entire group of scientists who collectively developed it. Yet, Malone was the only one in the group who stepped away and reported the potential issues from his group. It stripped him of his credentials too.
And everything he said could happen 3 years ago, has actually happened. But, he was not the only dr explaining these scenarios we are in now. Dr Cole also explained the spike protein damages 3 years ago and never to use injections during a pandemic, dr Gerrt Vandenboshe said the same thing, Dr Michael Yeadon, Dr Judy micovitz also said the same thing early on. They all spoke up and were censored for it. Are they all controlled opposition? They helped save the people who listened early on. Every single one of them. And they were all correct every step of the way about all of the potential health issues and things 3 years ago.
Paul really expresses so much hate for Malone, but why? Where is that hatred coming from? Is there a reason it’s so intense? What happened between Paul Alexander and Malone that seems to have such intense hatred for him? Please explain where it stems from.
I have always felt something was odd with Malone . Never liked him from the beginning of this Covid fiasco!
I’m loving your take on him . I always thought he was the controlled opposition .Whenever I saw him speak at these freedom rallies he hogged all the time . Thanks for making me laugh at your take on “ Maloney” Keep up the good work!
How is it you, Dr Paul, and 2nd Smartest, know Malone to be "controlled opposition" and a malignant narcissist? Please explain that. Controlled opposition is when for example, oil companies finance an environmental group against oil. The group wants less oil, more regulation. The upshot is the enviro group gets more regulation, which ends up increasing the price of oil, and making oil cost more. The oil companies then make more money.
What is the situation with Malone that does similar work?
Dr. Paul, who is paying you to write defamatory pieces on Malone? It seems to be the only subject you become foaming at the mouth off the hook over. Otherwise, you are fairly rational, if passionate (no problem with passionate). The CIA?
I am concerned when you, Leah etc. write "Hang 'em high!" Please be careful to not get nailed with "inciting violence." Careful Due Process, first.
Why didn't Malone spent all that lawyer money in leading a class action against social media censoring him and all of us? At least he would have done something real for the cause!
The REAL Robert Malone
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-real-robert-malone
Please tell 2 nd Smartest that he would have a large following if he could take a little criticism ( for me, it was over his goofy friend named Sid ) and stopped censoring his subscribers off his Stack for " a 100 years". That is a long time! Smart, funny guy but perhaps his ego is too fragile? Or perhaps there is another explanation he does not want an open forum on his Stack? Not a fan of Free Speech?
Any response 2nd? We like you, but inquiring minds want to know.
The adult, constructive thing for the Breggins and Dr Malone to do is acknowledge a misunderstanding, talk the issue thru in a non-personal way, and then let it go and continue with the mission of Medical Freedom. Isn't that what scientists do? But if U lob personal attacks at somebody, don't be surprised if they attack U right back. Stick to arguing about-the-facts not about-the-people.
What someone says about others, shows alot about themselves. I like Dr Malone. I like Dr Alexander. I like the 2nd Smartest guy. I think U all have something to add. The bickering is a net negative. If U don't like someone's argument, attack the argument, not the person. You all sound like children.
Paul,
Maybe you should take great note from this Breggin piece before telling anyone to vote for Kennedy for anything…
Robert Kennedy, Steve Kirsch, and Robert Malone – What’s It All About? by Peter Breggin MD & Ginger Breggin | Apr 22, 2023 |
I thought you liked the Breggins!
Malone is so boring. He may be full of himself but he refuses to double down on his mistakes and push the shots. Fauci, Walensky, Birx are where it's at:
"The bureaucratic compulsive displays signs of narcissistic traits alongside the compulsivity. They are champions of tradition, values, and bureaucracy. They cherish organizations that follow hierarchies and feel comforted by definitive roles between subordinates and superiors, and the known expectations and responsibilities. They derive their identity from work and project an image of diligence, reliability, and commitment to their institution. They view work and productivity in a polarized manner; either done or not. They may use their power and status to inflict fear and obedience in their subordinates if they do not strictly follow their rules and procedures, and derive pleasure from the sense of control and power that they acquire by doing so."
I recall Dr Ruby being served a cease and desist letter from Malones lawyer for constant defamation. He asked her to stop putting information out, he said if not she would receive a cease and desist letter. She was called out several times by Dr Ryan Cole for wrong information as well. Malone followed through and she received that letter.
I don’t know what to believe about Malone. The first podcast with Bret Weinstein and Steve Kirsch was very informative. Malone was invited to that Podcast, he spoke up brought awareness of what was known at that time. He took the shots himself and was very ill - and several times since. He’s been involved and met with numerous world renowned credible respected top drs and scientists - Gerrt Vandenboshe, Dr Michael Yeadon, Dr Kory, Dr McCullough, Dr Ryan Cole, Dr Urso, Dr James Thorp, And several others do still share their time and knowledge at numerous live as well as online events.
Malone never had to speak up about anything. He did not ever have to mention his early history of involvement and also how he reported the issues he recognized when mr NA was in development- he stepped away from it many years prior. He was not the only one involved in that development. It was an entire group of scientists who collectively developed it. Yet, Malone was the only one in the group who stepped away and reported the potential issues from his group. It stripped him of his credentials too.
And everything he said could happen 3 years ago, has actually happened. But, he was not the only dr explaining these scenarios we are in now. Dr Cole also explained the spike protein damages 3 years ago and never to use injections during a pandemic, dr Gerrt Vandenboshe said the same thing, Dr Michael Yeadon, Dr Judy micovitz also said the same thing early on. They all spoke up and were censored for it. Are they all controlled opposition? They helped save the people who listened early on. Every single one of them. And they were all correct every step of the way about all of the potential health issues and things 3 years ago.
Paul really expresses so much hate for Malone, but why? Where is that hatred coming from? Is there a reason it’s so intense? What happened between Paul Alexander and Malone that seems to have such intense hatred for him? Please explain where it stems from.
I would appreciate a mediated debate/interview (Tucker?) between Malone and Alexander.
I've followed 2nd SG for a long while … I've always wondered if you were #1, Dr. Alexander.😉
Wait was it a separate case or part of the Breggin suit?
Was heartbreaking and humiliating for me to see Bob go from hero to subzero ... largely because I didn’t realize I’d become a fanboy
One of the few writers always on some cutting edge.