I have always felt something was odd with Malone . Never liked him from the beginning of this Covid fiasco!
I’m loving your take on him . I always thought he was the controlled opposition .Whenever I saw him speak at these freedom rallies he hogged all the time . Thanks for making me laugh at your take on “ Maloney” Keep up the good work!
How is it you, Dr Paul, and 2nd Smartest, know Malone to be "controlled opposition" and a malignant narcissist? Please explain that. Controlled opposition is when for example, oil companies finance an environmental group against oil. The group wants less oil, more regulation. The upshot is the enviro group gets more regulation, which ends up increasing the price of oil, and making oil cost more. The oil companies then make more money.
What is the situation with Malone that does similar work?
Dr. Paul, who is paying you to write defamatory pieces on Malone? It seems to be the only subject you become foaming at the mouth off the hook over. Otherwise, you are fairly rational, if passionate (no problem with passionate). The CIA?
I am concerned when you, Leah etc. write "Hang 'em high!" Please be careful to not get nailed with "inciting violence." Careful Due Process, first.
Dr. Malone showed bad judgment suing the people who are his putative allies against Health tyranny. At best it was petty. At any rate, I have never listened to him or read any of his essays since. But I haven't libeled him either. Dr. Paul, I think assigning motives to Dr. Malone is a bridge too far. I appreciate the good news about Ruby and am interested to know for what (stupid) reason he sued her. God bless.
I guess I am not interested enough to seek out the details. He strikes me as a pompous ass (I saw him once in a large zoom conference with a few of the more outspoken naturopaths. He looked uncomfortable and highly stressed as if they were contagious.)
I don’t recall him ever really saying in his substack but then again I was banned for 100 years about 6 months ago so I haven’t been back much. One thing is for sure, he is not after a large Substack following.
Who the F cares if you are "concerned", you Authoritarian Libtard.
" I am concerned " who the hell do you think you are to be "concerned " ? PA's mother?
Either that or an Authoritarian Libtard.
You know, on second hand, Malone's mRNA injections are a great thing for mankind and you also. Please go get your boosters ( every 5-6 months Mr Bourla, CDC, FDA says ) and you can show your support for Malone and help contribute to his Patent Royalties.
My experienced has shown me that "authoritarian libtards" and other oppressors of Free Speech and our Constitutional usually resort to immediate ad hominem when they do not like something, rather than articulate their basis for their opinion. They go for insults "right out of the box" and expressing aggression.
You care enough to attempt to insult and demean me for my post, rather than show me facts with a basis.
Just like a Libtard. You come in with the reprimands and the authoritarian warning/threats telling others they are prejudging when it is they that have the facts and not you! THEN, RIGHT ON TARGET YOU START CRYING VICTIM! “ Stop hitting me, stop hitting me! “
The onus is NOT on me to educate you.
Go do your homework and prerequisites before you get to this site’s Grade Level.
Or better yet, go play Victim on your NYT sites. They sympathize with constant victimology passive aggression.
You are wasting our time unless you are a bot and then you are doing your job.
When u dont know shit, be humble enough to know you don’t know snd tread lightly.
You have 3 years of catching up to do. All the facts and Contracts and Patents are out there. Go get them.
Everybody who knows anything about mRNA knows Maloney is controlled opposition.
You sound new to the 3 year long + , detailed evidence game.
Start with the Dark Horse Podcast, where he chooses to talk / debate with NO ONE Medical so he cannot be called out or asked anything Medical. In fact come to think of it, that has been his usual MO over all the years. Lone guy in the woods making a shit load of money from the US DOD/ DARPA. Like Fraudci. There is a reason.
Think about it....Let's say you knew everything about potatoes, you were an expert and a lot of shit was happening with potatoes. And you went " public " with your potato information however when you were public, it was only you talking about potatoes, no other potato experts and when you did include others in a informational session or debate , it was only with people who knew nothing about potatoes. So you would make a claim, " it is ok for potatoes to be all covered with dots " and the others would shrug and go along.
But in reality.....dum, dum, dum....it was NOT ok for potatoes to be completely covered with dots.
This is how " Controlled Opposition " is dished up to the public. Propaganda 101.
I think Dr. Mark Crispin Miller teaches a class at NYU. You might be able to take it online or in the least sign up for his Substack here on substack.com Very informative.
Also you may want to take a class in Justice and Self defense. You are allowed to kill people who are trying to kill You and your family. It is called Self Defense. Let me tell you, you would be the first to use that defense if it came to it.
Wow. You make a lot of convenient assumptions, and they boost your need to demonstrate your feelings of superiority without logical discussion. Generalization: "Everybody who knows anything about mRNA knows Maloney is controlled opposition."
Oh.
That is facile - you can dispose of the discussion with that. How do you know that I must not know anything about mRNA, and how does knowledge about mRNA enable one to diagnose Dr. Malone as "controlled opposition?" If you had facts you could articulate, then why did you not? In a paroxysm of helpfulness, you airily told me to go take classes. So, again, facile, dismissive and having a conversation with yourself and an imaginary clueless unintelligent uninformed foe ("Authoritarian Libtard" you said in the earlier post.) You changed subjects briskly- I think they were meant to be subjects. You wind up with lethal self-defense as your last lecture to "me" or that imaginary foe.
Do you feel any satisfaction now from the dopamine high that usually comes with having counted multiple coup upon a person - oh, wait ! I am not a person, you have objectifie me deemed me an Authoritarian Libtard. Okay, Freedominnotfree, you "won!" Not surprising since you set up straw men for yourself with an imaginary foe.
I did watch Dr Malone's first appearance on Dark Horse. Brett didn't invite someone else "Medical" to that show for a debate. That show was not meant to be a debate.
Have a great day, and may blessings and peace go with you.
Why didn't Malone spent all that lawyer money in leading a class action against social media censoring him and all of us? At least he would have done something real for the cause!
Please tell 2 nd Smartest that he would have a large following if he could take a little criticism ( for me, it was over his goofy friend named Sid ) and stopped censoring his subscribers off his Stack for " a 100 years". That is a long time! Smart, funny guy but perhaps his ego is too fragile? Or perhaps there is another explanation he does not want an open forum on his Stack? Not a fan of Free Speech?
Any response 2nd? We like you, but inquiring minds want to know.
He booted me for pointing out that Joe Tippens recommended the Merck products for Fenbendozole for cancer and that there were lots of fakes out there. I never said HIS product was fake. Just very over priced. He didn’t appreciate that. Makes me not trust him.
Yes, I mentioned a famous Dr in Houston that also had a simple cure for cancer for decades and the FDA and gov came after him big time, after they tried unsuccessfully to get a piece of the action, there is a documentary about it snd he did like me mentioning another alternative to the fenben he was selling.
The famous Dr prevailed. Sorry the name escapes me but pretty sure it starts with a B,
Strange because it was not direct competition whatsoever. Why wouldn’t he want all healthy, proven alternatives treatments for cancer mentioned? Restricting free speech for that ?
The adult, constructive thing for the Breggins and Dr Malone to do is acknowledge a misunderstanding, talk the issue thru in a non-personal way, and then let it go and continue with the mission of Medical Freedom. Isn't that what scientists do? But if U lob personal attacks at somebody, don't be surprised if they attack U right back. Stick to arguing about-the-facts not about-the-people.
What someone says about others, shows alot about themselves. I like Dr Malone. I like Dr Alexander. I like the 2nd Smartest guy. I think U all have something to add. The bickering is a net negative. If U don't like someone's argument, attack the argument, not the person. You all sound like children.
Malone is so boring. He may be full of himself but he refuses to double down on his mistakes and push the shots. Fauci, Walensky, Birx are where it's at:
"The bureaucratic compulsive displays signs of narcissistic traits alongside the compulsivity. They are champions of tradition, values, and bureaucracy. They cherish organizations that follow hierarchies and feel comforted by definitive roles between subordinates and superiors, and the known expectations and responsibilities. They derive their identity from work and project an image of diligence, reliability, and commitment to their institution. They view work and productivity in a polarized manner; either done or not. They may use their power and status to inflict fear and obedience in their subordinates if they do not strictly follow their rules and procedures, and derive pleasure from the sense of control and power that they acquire by doing so."
I recall Dr Ruby being served a cease and desist letter from Malones lawyer for constant defamation. He asked her to stop putting information out, he said if not she would receive a cease and desist letter. She was called out several times by Dr Ryan Cole for wrong information as well. Malone followed through and she received that letter.
I don’t know what to believe about Malone. The first podcast with Bret Weinstein and Steve Kirsch was very informative. Malone was invited to that Podcast, he spoke up brought awareness of what was known at that time. He took the shots himself and was very ill - and several times since. He’s been involved and met with numerous world renowned credible respected top drs and scientists - Gerrt Vandenboshe, Dr Michael Yeadon, Dr Kory, Dr McCullough, Dr Ryan Cole, Dr Urso, Dr James Thorp, And several others do still share their time and knowledge at numerous live as well as online events.
Malone never had to speak up about anything. He did not ever have to mention his early history of involvement and also how he reported the issues he recognized when mr NA was in development- he stepped away from it many years prior. He was not the only one involved in that development. It was an entire group of scientists who collectively developed it. Yet, Malone was the only one in the group who stepped away and reported the potential issues from his group. It stripped him of his credentials too.
And everything he said could happen 3 years ago, has actually happened. But, he was not the only dr explaining these scenarios we are in now. Dr Cole also explained the spike protein damages 3 years ago and never to use injections during a pandemic, dr Gerrt Vandenboshe said the same thing, Dr Michael Yeadon, Dr Judy micovitz also said the same thing early on. They all spoke up and were censored for it. Are they all controlled opposition? They helped save the people who listened early on. Every single one of them. And they were all correct every step of the way about all of the potential health issues and things 3 years ago.
Paul really expresses so much hate for Malone, but why? Where is that hatred coming from? Is there a reason it’s so intense? What happened between Paul Alexander and Malone that seems to have such intense hatred for him? Please explain where it stems from.
I have always felt something was odd with Malone . Never liked him from the beginning of this Covid fiasco!
I’m loving your take on him . I always thought he was the controlled opposition .Whenever I saw him speak at these freedom rallies he hogged all the time . Thanks for making me laugh at your take on “ Maloney” Keep up the good work!
How is it you, Dr Paul, and 2nd Smartest, know Malone to be "controlled opposition" and a malignant narcissist? Please explain that. Controlled opposition is when for example, oil companies finance an environmental group against oil. The group wants less oil, more regulation. The upshot is the enviro group gets more regulation, which ends up increasing the price of oil, and making oil cost more. The oil companies then make more money.
What is the situation with Malone that does similar work?
Dr. Paul, who is paying you to write defamatory pieces on Malone? It seems to be the only subject you become foaming at the mouth off the hook over. Otherwise, you are fairly rational, if passionate (no problem with passionate). The CIA?
I am concerned when you, Leah etc. write "Hang 'em high!" Please be careful to not get nailed with "inciting violence." Careful Due Process, first.
Dr. Malone showed bad judgment suing the people who are his putative allies against Health tyranny. At best it was petty. At any rate, I have never listened to him or read any of his essays since. But I haven't libeled him either. Dr. Paul, I think assigning motives to Dr. Malone is a bridge too far. I appreciate the good news about Ruby and am interested to know for what (stupid) reason he sued her. God bless.
Then do you homework and find out.
I guess I am not interested enough to seek out the details. He strikes me as a pompous ass (I saw him once in a large zoom conference with a few of the more outspoken naturopaths. He looked uncomfortable and highly stressed as if they were contagious.)
Is that what he is a Naturopath?
I don’t recall him ever really saying in his substack but then again I was banned for 100 years about 6 months ago so I haven’t been back much. One thing is for sure, he is not after a large Substack following.
Malone is not a naturopath.
I did do the "homework." I am a retired attorney with a lot of trial experience.
Potatohead,
Who the F cares if you are "concerned", you Authoritarian Libtard.
" I am concerned " who the hell do you think you are to be "concerned " ? PA's mother?
Either that or an Authoritarian Libtard.
You know, on second hand, Malone's mRNA injections are a great thing for mankind and you also. Please go get your boosters ( every 5-6 months Mr Bourla, CDC, FDA says ) and you can show your support for Malone and help contribute to his Patent Royalties.
Put your arm out where your mouth is.
My experienced has shown me that "authoritarian libtards" and other oppressors of Free Speech and our Constitutional usually resort to immediate ad hominem when they do not like something, rather than articulate their basis for their opinion. They go for insults "right out of the box" and expressing aggression.
You care enough to attempt to insult and demean me for my post, rather than show me facts with a basis.
Just like a Libtard. You come in with the reprimands and the authoritarian warning/threats telling others they are prejudging when it is they that have the facts and not you! THEN, RIGHT ON TARGET YOU START CRYING VICTIM! “ Stop hitting me, stop hitting me! “
The onus is NOT on me to educate you.
Go do your homework and prerequisites before you get to this site’s Grade Level.
Or better yet, go play Victim on your NYT sites. They sympathize with constant victimology passive aggression.
You are wasting our time unless you are a bot and then you are doing your job.
When u dont know shit, be humble enough to know you don’t know snd tread lightly.
You have 3 years of catching up to do. All the facts and Contracts and Patents are out there. Go get them.
Potato,
Everybody who knows anything about mRNA knows Maloney is controlled opposition.
You sound new to the 3 year long + , detailed evidence game.
Start with the Dark Horse Podcast, where he chooses to talk / debate with NO ONE Medical so he cannot be called out or asked anything Medical. In fact come to think of it, that has been his usual MO over all the years. Lone guy in the woods making a shit load of money from the US DOD/ DARPA. Like Fraudci. There is a reason.
Think about it....Let's say you knew everything about potatoes, you were an expert and a lot of shit was happening with potatoes. And you went " public " with your potato information however when you were public, it was only you talking about potatoes, no other potato experts and when you did include others in a informational session or debate , it was only with people who knew nothing about potatoes. So you would make a claim, " it is ok for potatoes to be all covered with dots " and the others would shrug and go along.
But in reality.....dum, dum, dum....it was NOT ok for potatoes to be completely covered with dots.
This is how " Controlled Opposition " is dished up to the public. Propaganda 101.
I think Dr. Mark Crispin Miller teaches a class at NYU. You might be able to take it online or in the least sign up for his Substack here on substack.com Very informative.
Also you may want to take a class in Justice and Self defense. You are allowed to kill people who are trying to kill You and your family. It is called Self Defense. Let me tell you, you would be the first to use that defense if it came to it.
Wow. You make a lot of convenient assumptions, and they boost your need to demonstrate your feelings of superiority without logical discussion. Generalization: "Everybody who knows anything about mRNA knows Maloney is controlled opposition."
Oh.
That is facile - you can dispose of the discussion with that. How do you know that I must not know anything about mRNA, and how does knowledge about mRNA enable one to diagnose Dr. Malone as "controlled opposition?" If you had facts you could articulate, then why did you not? In a paroxysm of helpfulness, you airily told me to go take classes. So, again, facile, dismissive and having a conversation with yourself and an imaginary clueless unintelligent uninformed foe ("Authoritarian Libtard" you said in the earlier post.) You changed subjects briskly- I think they were meant to be subjects. You wind up with lethal self-defense as your last lecture to "me" or that imaginary foe.
Do you feel any satisfaction now from the dopamine high that usually comes with having counted multiple coup upon a person - oh, wait ! I am not a person, you have objectifie me deemed me an Authoritarian Libtard. Okay, Freedominnotfree, you "won!" Not surprising since you set up straw men for yourself with an imaginary foe.
I did watch Dr Malone's first appearance on Dark Horse. Brett didn't invite someone else "Medical" to that show for a debate. That show was not meant to be a debate.
Have a great day, and may blessings and peace go with you.
Nobody is paying him in my opinion,but I agree with him on Maline .
Nobody is paying him in my opinion,but I agree with him on Maline .
Why didn't Malone spent all that lawyer money in leading a class action against social media censoring him and all of us? At least he would have done something real for the cause!
The REAL Robert Malone
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-real-robert-malone
Please tell 2 nd Smartest that he would have a large following if he could take a little criticism ( for me, it was over his goofy friend named Sid ) and stopped censoring his subscribers off his Stack for " a 100 years". That is a long time! Smart, funny guy but perhaps his ego is too fragile? Or perhaps there is another explanation he does not want an open forum on his Stack? Not a fan of Free Speech?
Any response 2nd? We like you, but inquiring minds want to know.
He booted me for pointing out that Joe Tippens recommended the Merck products for Fenbendozole for cancer and that there were lots of fakes out there. I never said HIS product was fake. Just very over priced. He didn’t appreciate that. Makes me not trust him.
Yes, I mentioned a famous Dr in Houston that also had a simple cure for cancer for decades and the FDA and gov came after him big time, after they tried unsuccessfully to get a piece of the action, there is a documentary about it snd he did like me mentioning another alternative to the fenben he was selling.
The famous Dr prevailed. Sorry the name escapes me but pretty sure it starts with a B,
Strange because it was not direct competition whatsoever. Why wouldn’t he want all healthy, proven alternatives treatments for cancer mentioned? Restricting free speech for that ?
Seems excessive. Good to note.
Best
The adult, constructive thing for the Breggins and Dr Malone to do is acknowledge a misunderstanding, talk the issue thru in a non-personal way, and then let it go and continue with the mission of Medical Freedom. Isn't that what scientists do? But if U lob personal attacks at somebody, don't be surprised if they attack U right back. Stick to arguing about-the-facts not about-the-people.
What someone says about others, shows alot about themselves. I like Dr Malone. I like Dr Alexander. I like the 2nd Smartest guy. I think U all have something to add. The bickering is a net negative. If U don't like someone's argument, attack the argument, not the person. You all sound like children.
Paul,
Maybe you should take great note from this Breggin piece before telling anyone to vote for Kennedy for anything…
Robert Kennedy, Steve Kirsch, and Robert Malone – What’s It All About? by Peter Breggin MD & Ginger Breggin | Apr 22, 2023 |
I thought you liked the Breggins!
Malone is so boring. He may be full of himself but he refuses to double down on his mistakes and push the shots. Fauci, Walensky, Birx are where it's at:
"The bureaucratic compulsive displays signs of narcissistic traits alongside the compulsivity. They are champions of tradition, values, and bureaucracy. They cherish organizations that follow hierarchies and feel comforted by definitive roles between subordinates and superiors, and the known expectations and responsibilities. They derive their identity from work and project an image of diligence, reliability, and commitment to their institution. They view work and productivity in a polarized manner; either done or not. They may use their power and status to inflict fear and obedience in their subordinates if they do not strictly follow their rules and procedures, and derive pleasure from the sense of control and power that they acquire by doing so."
I recall Dr Ruby being served a cease and desist letter from Malones lawyer for constant defamation. He asked her to stop putting information out, he said if not she would receive a cease and desist letter. She was called out several times by Dr Ryan Cole for wrong information as well. Malone followed through and she received that letter.
I don’t know what to believe about Malone. The first podcast with Bret Weinstein and Steve Kirsch was very informative. Malone was invited to that Podcast, he spoke up brought awareness of what was known at that time. He took the shots himself and was very ill - and several times since. He’s been involved and met with numerous world renowned credible respected top drs and scientists - Gerrt Vandenboshe, Dr Michael Yeadon, Dr Kory, Dr McCullough, Dr Ryan Cole, Dr Urso, Dr James Thorp, And several others do still share their time and knowledge at numerous live as well as online events.
Malone never had to speak up about anything. He did not ever have to mention his early history of involvement and also how he reported the issues he recognized when mr NA was in development- he stepped away from it many years prior. He was not the only one involved in that development. It was an entire group of scientists who collectively developed it. Yet, Malone was the only one in the group who stepped away and reported the potential issues from his group. It stripped him of his credentials too.
And everything he said could happen 3 years ago, has actually happened. But, he was not the only dr explaining these scenarios we are in now. Dr Cole also explained the spike protein damages 3 years ago and never to use injections during a pandemic, dr Gerrt Vandenboshe said the same thing, Dr Michael Yeadon, Dr Judy micovitz also said the same thing early on. They all spoke up and were censored for it. Are they all controlled opposition? They helped save the people who listened early on. Every single one of them. And they were all correct every step of the way about all of the potential health issues and things 3 years ago.
Paul really expresses so much hate for Malone, but why? Where is that hatred coming from? Is there a reason it’s so intense? What happened between Paul Alexander and Malone that seems to have such intense hatred for him? Please explain where it stems from.
Hatred or distrust? & the bitcoin thing..
I would appreciate a mediated debate/interview (Tucker?) between Malone and Alexander.
I've followed 2nd SG for a long while … I've always wondered if you were #1, Dr. Alexander.😉
Wait was it a separate case or part of the Breggin suit?
Was heartbreaking and humiliating for me to see Bob go from hero to subzero ... largely because I didn’t realize I’d become a fanboy
At least you see now!
One of the few writers always on some cutting edge.