Not sure but I think 92% of the population is vaccinated so if 92% of deaths are among the vaxxed what that really means is that the proportion of deaths is about equal between vaxxed and unvaxxed. It does at least prove the vax does nothing for you.
Not sure but I think 92% of the population is vaccinated so if 92% of deaths are among the vaxxed what that really means is that the proportion of deaths is about equal between vaxxed and unvaxxed. It does at least prove the vax does nothing for you.
Don’t think you’re quite getting this. If 1000 die 920 statistically are vaxed. It doesn’t really matter how many are or are not. Something that was supposed to be effective is the opposite. In saying that I read that govt inflated vaxed numbers, as all countries did, and it was only 72% double and 67% triple. Remember these figures don’t include the injured and people who now have turbo cancers etc. So it’s not just ineffective it’s bloody mega dangerous and evil.
Nope - has never been that high - they used old population data and guesstimates to "calculate" the unvaxxed population by subtracting the known vaxxed population. However, the UKHSA data has actual medical records for several million more people than the ONS estimated (something like 63M UKHSA vs 55M ONS). US played similar games by lumping anyone who wasn't in the local hospital records as vaxxed - and therefore "unverified" status - into unvaxxed category. Helps to skew the numbers when you dramatically undercount unjabbed population and/or dramatically overallocate jabbed hospital patients into the unvaxxed category.
Especially when already also counting the newly jabbed - with that huge spike in deaths/adverse events/illness by far the worst in the first 3 days of and following the injections - as 'unvaccinated' for the first two weeks following each jab.
Or later simply leaving each jabee in the previous 'jab' category for two weeks, or otherwise counting everyone 'not up-to-date' on their shots as 'unvaccinated, or whatever else might be required to try to hide the facts, especially that fact of the worsening effects of each subsequent jab/'booster' on so very many people...
Not sure but I think 92% of the population is vaccinated so if 92% of deaths are among the vaxxed what that really means is that the proportion of deaths is about equal between vaxxed and unvaxxed. It does at least prove the vax does nothing for you.
Don’t think you’re quite getting this. If 1000 die 920 statistically are vaxed. It doesn’t really matter how many are or are not. Something that was supposed to be effective is the opposite. In saying that I read that govt inflated vaxed numbers, as all countries did, and it was only 72% double and 67% triple. Remember these figures don’t include the injured and people who now have turbo cancers etc. So it’s not just ineffective it’s bloody mega dangerous and evil.
Nope - has never been that high - they used old population data and guesstimates to "calculate" the unvaxxed population by subtracting the known vaxxed population. However, the UKHSA data has actual medical records for several million more people than the ONS estimated (something like 63M UKHSA vs 55M ONS). US played similar games by lumping anyone who wasn't in the local hospital records as vaxxed - and therefore "unverified" status - into unvaxxed category. Helps to skew the numbers when you dramatically undercount unjabbed population and/or dramatically overallocate jabbed hospital patients into the unvaxxed category.
Especially when already also counting the newly jabbed - with that huge spike in deaths/adverse events/illness by far the worst in the first 3 days of and following the injections - as 'unvaccinated' for the first two weeks following each jab.
Or later simply leaving each jabee in the previous 'jab' category for two weeks, or otherwise counting everyone 'not up-to-date' on their shots as 'unvaccinated, or whatever else might be required to try to hide the facts, especially that fact of the worsening effects of each subsequent jab/'booster' on so very many people...
Agee! There’s a lot more of us u/v than the public think or even the govt know. Same in Aus I think where I live.
“Maybe” 92% had one jab. But questionable reporting on that. The “fully vaccinated” is far lower.