Boasberg is not a State Judge, he's an originally Obama nominated D.C. District Court Judge, so not elected, just approved by the Congress after nomination. D.C. is not a State.
After being appointed to D.C. District Court he was assigned as Judge of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA)...guess when? Yep 5/18/1…
Boasberg is not a State Judge, he's an originally Obama nominated D.C. District Court Judge, so not elected, just approved by the Congress after nomination. D.C. is not a State.
After being appointed to D.C. District Court he was assigned as Judge of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA)...guess when? Yep 5/18/14-5/19/21 (remember the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax & FISA involvement 2016-2017?) and "Presiding" from 1/1/20-5/19/21...
During that time he also served as CHIEF Judge of the United States Alien Terrorist Removal Court from 1/1/20-1/1/25, so somehow he got wiggled into that court while Trump was still (1st term) President - manipulation by who? And what for?...thought that came to my mind mind was possibly to ensure Terrorist's were NOT removed during Trump's Presidency including if he won in 2020, thinking Trump couldn't remove him, but since Biden ?won, he was kept on there to aid and abet during Biden Presidency...
And in between, somehow he was assigned CHIEF Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on 3/17/23. He also colluded with other judges.
Interesting huh??? Little bit of prior self-interest there, especially considering his Daughter's involvement with NGO providing legal help and training on how to avoid ICE, etc.? And how does any Judge have dual judgeships at the same time? IDK, but Julie Kelly and Mike Davis (& others) have been reporting this and more and provided advisement to Congress...mostly regarding impeachment, but pure removal by Congress is possible, so we'll see how that goes for Justice Roberts/SCOTUS. If that happens Boasberg will only be the first.
I don't think they have to have 2/3 Senate vote like impeachment if acting on Rep Biggs Resolution that I shared above in this thread. The way it was introduced is called a "Simple Resolution", so there is no action required of the President and can be introduced in either the House or the Senate. It also appears since it has been referred to the House Judiciary Committee for action (25R-19D) that only a majority would be necessary. Though it is stated it is to be "exhibited to the Senate". Not sure what that means since it's not an impeachment, so there would be no "impeachment" trial in the Senate. If the Senate does take it up separately then the Judiciary Committee there is 12R-9D, and I believe it would be a simple majority also., but will be watching to see how it evolves. Either way, yes any Republican on those committees voting against removal of Boasberg per that Resolution would be a traitorous move in itself. Would be something to pay attention to and give voice to.
I can't imagine Biggs didn't get a pre-quoram in the House and possibly in the Senate as well - before introducing this Resolution.
You should read it...pretty cut and dry and includes the FISA involvement.
LauraB, you should copy and move this up in the discussion as it is very interesting and could be viewed easily by others. 👍 Substack is great for progression of discussions but the interesting threads may gets lost.
Yeah I come late to the party sometimes, since the Doc likes to post 5x a day hard to get to them until there's too many to reply to. I know the Doc is off to the races on several others and only gets to the top comments. Just now getting to your reply lol.
I'll try and remember that in the future. Thanks s r!
Boasberg is not a State Judge, he's an originally Obama nominated D.C. District Court Judge, so not elected, just approved by the Congress after nomination. D.C. is not a State.
After being appointed to D.C. District Court he was assigned as Judge of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA)...guess when? Yep 5/18/14-5/19/21 (remember the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax & FISA involvement 2016-2017?) and "Presiding" from 1/1/20-5/19/21...
During that time he also served as CHIEF Judge of the United States Alien Terrorist Removal Court from 1/1/20-1/1/25, so somehow he got wiggled into that court while Trump was still (1st term) President - manipulation by who? And what for?...thought that came to my mind mind was possibly to ensure Terrorist's were NOT removed during Trump's Presidency including if he won in 2020, thinking Trump couldn't remove him, but since Biden ?won, he was kept on there to aid and abet during Biden Presidency...
And in between, somehow he was assigned CHIEF Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on 3/17/23. He also colluded with other judges.
Interesting huh??? Little bit of prior self-interest there, especially considering his Daughter's involvement with NGO providing legal help and training on how to avoid ICE, etc.? And how does any Judge have dual judgeships at the same time? IDK, but Julie Kelly and Mike Davis (& others) have been reporting this and more and provided advisement to Congress...mostly regarding impeachment, but pure removal by Congress is possible, so we'll see how that goes for Justice Roberts/SCOTUS. If that happens Boasberg will only be the first.
This will definitely prove who's a rhino or not in senate if they vote against not taking him out.
I don't think they have to have 2/3 Senate vote like impeachment if acting on Rep Biggs Resolution that I shared above in this thread. The way it was introduced is called a "Simple Resolution", so there is no action required of the President and can be introduced in either the House or the Senate. It also appears since it has been referred to the House Judiciary Committee for action (25R-19D) that only a majority would be necessary. Though it is stated it is to be "exhibited to the Senate". Not sure what that means since it's not an impeachment, so there would be no "impeachment" trial in the Senate. If the Senate does take it up separately then the Judiciary Committee there is 12R-9D, and I believe it would be a simple majority also., but will be watching to see how it evolves. Either way, yes any Republican on those committees voting against removal of Boasberg per that Resolution would be a traitorous move in itself. Would be something to pay attention to and give voice to.
I can't imagine Biggs didn't get a pre-quoram in the House and possibly in the Senate as well - before introducing this Resolution.
You should read it...pretty cut and dry and includes the FISA involvement.
LauraB, you should copy and move this up in the discussion as it is very interesting and could be viewed easily by others. 👍 Substack is great for progression of discussions but the interesting threads may gets lost.
Yeah I come late to the party sometimes, since the Doc likes to post 5x a day hard to get to them until there's too many to reply to. I know the Doc is off to the races on several others and only gets to the top comments. Just now getting to your reply lol.
I'll try and remember that in the future. Thanks s r!
Very interesting 👌 👍