Since this comes from the British Medical Journal and they have been more balanced thanks largely to Peter Doshi, I didn’t dismiss it out of hand, but I suspect the study was rigged to deliver a particular outcome. I notice they say “fewer people die from COVID-19,” but that doesn't mean they’re not dying from other issues like, say, myocarditis. Someone else noticed the end date is December 2021, prior to the large-scale booster rollout, which is associated with a larger death toll than just one- or two-jab victims.
I haven’t had a chance to investigate but would be curious to get your thoughts if you have time to take a look. Thanks, Paul!
Great compilation! It grieved me to read the article, "Moderna seeks to be 1st with COVID shots for littlest kids." So many parents just can't wait to get their babies jabbed. But there was good (hopeful?) news at the end ~ the jab rates for children were lower than I expected:
"Less than a third of children ages 5 to 11 have had two vaccinations, and 58% of those ages 12 to 17."
This is an article from March of this year. The views are very far out from my own as a health professional. It is hard to se medical personnel so ignorant to what these injections do to children, to people of all ages. https://www.verywellhealth.com/delay-kids-vaccines-reaction-5220428
I am surrounded by friends and family who won't even look at anything I send them on the subject ~ yet I still feel guilty (and so very sad) about not being able to reach them. Given your profession, you must feel similarly, but to a much greater degree day in and day out. And it wouldn't surprise me if you also have to deal with a lot of suppressed anger...
No need for pardon. Do things when they enter your path and let You guide you, one person cannot read everything that comes their way. In between your reads take time to recharge your energy and go out in nature and get grounded, hug a tree. It is very healing.
Nothing to do with greater or smaller degree of sadness whatever your profession is. It is just sadness but happiness for every person that have listened and did not take these injections.
The anger though is very much present as the medical professionals that are participating in this are highly responsible for their actions whatever their reasons are, it makes my blood boil, often.
When a person is in cognitive dissonance no amount of facts can brake that. Continue to talk about and inform in a light way for those that are willing to listen, ask questions to the ones you want to reach that makes them have to think if there could be more than one solution to this ‘covid’. If they know anyone that has reacted bad to these injections, if they trust the government, how many injections they are willing to take, if their freedom in any way have been taken away or effected etc.
And do not feel guilty, they are the closed, feared and stubborn ones that does not want to engage in an open discussion. Try not to spend to much of your energy to non reachable, it drains you.
Paul, my resident Twitter troll (see this post: https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/dispatches-from-the-new-normal-front-d2c) just shared this BMJ observational study, and I’d be curious to get your thoughts on it:
• “New study shows fewer people die from covid-19 in better vaccinated communities” (https://www.bmj.com/company/newsroom/new-study-shows-fewer-people-die-from-covid-19-in-better-vaccinated-communities/)
Since this comes from the British Medical Journal and they have been more balanced thanks largely to Peter Doshi, I didn’t dismiss it out of hand, but I suspect the study was rigged to deliver a particular outcome. I notice they say “fewer people die from COVID-19,” but that doesn't mean they’re not dying from other issues like, say, myocarditis. Someone else noticed the end date is December 2021, prior to the large-scale booster rollout, which is associated with a larger death toll than just one- or two-jab victims.
I haven’t had a chance to investigate but would be curious to get your thoughts if you have time to take a look. Thanks, Paul!
"Study"... We have an abundance of detailed public data from many places.
Remember the pimps also had their "studies".
Of course. I was just surprised the BMJ published this as they usually have stringent standards that filter out the manipulated studies.
"....usually...."
Even Nature and The Lancet published "studies"... Remember HCQ in 2020.
All the publications are controlled.
I recall Dr Eric Rubin of Harvard is editor-in-chief of a NEJM of something like that. I rest my case.
I know, but Peter Doshi has played a significant role in exposing the dangers of the vaxx, so I’m still perplexed to see this in the BMJ.
There was supposedly no funding for this study, so no *apparent* conflicts of interest.
btw, BMJ has form in publishing other "studies" since 2020 - and before, of course.
Doshi is one guy. The fact that he was brave enough to say something publicly should tell you that he was not so influential behind the scenes.
Funding is only one clue. Some do it in hope of getting it. Then there are the activists like that Chanadian fishy David Fishman.
Great compilation! It grieved me to read the article, "Moderna seeks to be 1st with COVID shots for littlest kids." So many parents just can't wait to get their babies jabbed. But there was good (hopeful?) news at the end ~ the jab rates for children were lower than I expected:
"Less than a third of children ages 5 to 11 have had two vaccinations, and 58% of those ages 12 to 17."
This is an article from March of this year. The views are very far out from my own as a health professional. It is hard to se medical personnel so ignorant to what these injections do to children, to people of all ages. https://www.verywellhealth.com/delay-kids-vaccines-reaction-5220428
Another gut wrenching read ~ 😿.
I am surrounded by friends and family who won't even look at anything I send them on the subject ~ yet I still feel guilty (and so very sad) about not being able to reach them. Given your profession, you must feel similarly, but to a much greater degree day in and day out. And it wouldn't surprise me if you also have to deal with a lot of suppressed anger...
they will come around...hold firm...another thing, I try to look at the posts but so swamped so pardon me if cannot to all.
Thank you for the comment AND all of us understand you are on the go 24/7.
Dr Alexander
No need for pardon. Do things when they enter your path and let You guide you, one person cannot read everything that comes their way. In between your reads take time to recharge your energy and go out in nature and get grounded, hug a tree. It is very healing.
All good things for your continuing work forward.
Nothing to do with greater or smaller degree of sadness whatever your profession is. It is just sadness but happiness for every person that have listened and did not take these injections.
The anger though is very much present as the medical professionals that are participating in this are highly responsible for their actions whatever their reasons are, it makes my blood boil, often.
When a person is in cognitive dissonance no amount of facts can brake that. Continue to talk about and inform in a light way for those that are willing to listen, ask questions to the ones you want to reach that makes them have to think if there could be more than one solution to this ‘covid’. If they know anyone that has reacted bad to these injections, if they trust the government, how many injections they are willing to take, if their freedom in any way have been taken away or effected etc.
And do not feel guilty, they are the closed, feared and stubborn ones that does not want to engage in an open discussion. Try not to spend to much of your energy to non reachable, it drains you.
Thanks for your words of wisdom...
Paul: Keep this up and I may just have to put your bookmark above Citizen Free Press! Thank you for your service and your love of truth.