Alexander: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) after vaccination against COVID-19 in the UK: a multicentre cohort study (Perry et al.); another piece to the puzzle, be informed
Alexander: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) after vaccination against COVID-19 in the UK: a multicentre cohort study (Perry et al.); another piece to the puzzle, be informed
Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) has emerged as a rare side-effect of vaccination against COVID-19. CVT is the most common manifestation of this syndrome
Was there not a time where any one of these serious and fatal side effects would have resulted in the product being pulled from the market? How is it even possible that any institution would require these shots? It is barbaric to force these upon anyone.
There are so many hiding the magnitude of the risk. Each new study shows that condition X is exacerbated a bit by the shots, yes more than other vaccines in the past, more than population norms but still small numbers that can be explained as rare.
The catch is that there are hundreds of conditions it causes and the risk/damage is additive and this is why the VAERS (and similar) data are showing the spike. It is not because of myocarditis or VITT or whatever is a bit higher, it is because of ALL OF THEM TOGETHER are a real concern.
Was there not a time where any one of these serious and fatal side effects would have resulted in the product being pulled from the market? How is it even possible that any institution would require these shots? It is barbaric to force these upon anyone.
Was there not a time where any one of these serious and fatal side effects would have resulted in the product being pulled from the market? How is it even possible that any institution would require these shots? It is barbaric to force these upon anyone.
I don’t think it’s rare. But I’m a lowly clerk. I think when all is said and done we will see a whole bunch of versions of THrombocytopenia.
There are so many hiding the magnitude of the risk. Each new study shows that condition X is exacerbated a bit by the shots, yes more than other vaccines in the past, more than population norms but still small numbers that can be explained as rare.
The catch is that there are hundreds of conditions it causes and the risk/damage is additive and this is why the VAERS (and similar) data are showing the spike. It is not because of myocarditis or VITT or whatever is a bit higher, it is because of ALL OF THEM TOGETHER are a real concern.
Was there not a time where any one of these serious and fatal side effects would have resulted in the product being pulled from the market? How is it even possible that any institution would require these shots? It is barbaric to force these upon anyone.