All health research is a lie, a fraud, until proven otherwise? I say emphatic YES. All academic medical research is today is a money making get rich 'research grant' scheme; for people who are inept
All health research is a lie, a fraud, until proven otherwise? I say emphatic YES. All academic medical research is today is a money making get rich 'research grant' scheme; for people who are inept
This is my view fully & I agree, fully with Smith, I work & worked in this world. It's about people who cannot work in the 'real' world, hide away in academia & medicine to uncover NOTHING; $$$ only!
Sad but so true. I used to attend dozens of lectures given for free at a very highly rated medical school. Sometimes I would walk out and think these guys did not know anything. The stats and what they said were clearly wrong. I am an engineer and clearly not my field so I was shocked at how easily I could punch holes in their work. At the time I had no idea about the research dollar corruption schemes either.
All medical research is NOT a lie! The majority of the research involves a preplanned goal and the research is structured to achieve that endpoint! This is apparent in two 30 MILLION dollar NIH funded studies. The WHI of 20 years ago was to discredit the value of estrogen for bone health so Lilly could sell their targeted chemo drug that destroys the osteoblasts. Fast forward, and the VITAL study was underdosing Vitamin D but had the hidden agenda to push a refined Fish Oil as a Heart attack preventive. Since then they have extracted data from the study to continue to deny the true role Vitamin D has in maintaining immune system health as well as activating 3000 genes in our genome.
Also, the risk of dying from a virus is almost zero if your blood value is over 50ng's,. The problem is most Americans have a value of around half that! And those in the cellar are the greatest risk.
The mRNA research is the crowning glory of manipulated research to achive a financially profitable end point. Other research is made up to prove coffee is better than tea. Or tea is better than coffe. Or there is health value in Hershey Chocolate. The list is long. Read "Science in the Private Interest" Read "
Sickening" Read another 100 plus books by physicans exposing the medical lies. DOES NO GOOD The Politicians in DC are all bought and paid for and will not stop this gross distortion of medical research for profit and not good health. Dr. Paul"s anger is stressing him out , need to step back and do some mind-body mediatation. When my BP becomes elevated, I know the stress of this mRNA nightmare is getting to me. My view!
Agree. And please forgive me, but one of the Geniuses of Substack , the stat wizard, I think it was matthew crawford, just did an entire essay about the infantlism and 2nd grade math of the CDC's own stats....was an eye opener....he castigated them up and down for not hiring people who know statistics...I am going to try and find it for you.
Marcia Angell, former EIC of the NEJM pointed this out 10 years ago. In China you now have buildings of medical writers using AI that can produce any paper you want with any results.
There's a lot of research that's a lie. Three days ago I read a climate researcher has been busted for false claims of ocean acidification and die-off of Australia's Great Barrier Reef because - climate change! The Barrier Reef had a die-off due to other reasons and is now rapidly recovering. You hear much about that? Of course not. There's a professor in Australia who's fighting for his job because he challenged the demise of these vast corral beds.
Papers I have read have been garbage. Even the abstract did not match the headline which was unsupported. Further, the method taken did not match or address the hypothesis that was supposedly being studied. Data was from a different cohort and a different illness. Even then it did not support the headline claim. The word "may" is used for a reason.
The Pfizer trial was another example. Really no difference between the test group and the placebo group and neither was exposed to infection at all, let alone in a controlled manner. Efficacy at prevention was not tested at all, yet a claim of 95% was made.
Also you have to remember that most experiments with animals/tissues are done in a lab under fluorescent or LED or other fake light conditions and not under natural light of the sun where nature functions best. It does make a difference to the way humans function ..... we need natural light for various bodily functions such as our body clock and signaling for hormones etc.
110% correct. Trust no research as it has been corrupt going back over 30 years or longer. It is designed to provide billions of dollar to fake researchers and then their fake reports enable fake big pharma drugs to be marketed.
How much can we trust Cochrane after they ejected Gotzsche? Not much. And there’s a rumor Cochrane was purchased by some huge company. I don’t know the truth.
Was this written by Richard Smith? I briefly scanned it and didn’t see an attribution. Sounds like his honest work. “Time to assume medical research is fraudulent until proven otherwise” was the title of his BMJ editorial last year. Apt, isn’t it?
"But I am also still fantasizing of some place where the practice of medicine can still be undeniably helpful to human beings and society at large.", Dr. John P.A. Ioannidis
Why stop there? Virology is based on methods devoid of any controls, it all goes back to Enders sloppy isolation methods nearly 70 years ago which have not been seriously questioned or refuted.
Sad but so true. I used to attend dozens of lectures given for free at a very highly rated medical school. Sometimes I would walk out and think these guys did not know anything. The stats and what they said were clearly wrong. I am an engineer and clearly not my field so I was shocked at how easily I could punch holes in their work. At the time I had no idea about the research dollar corruption schemes either.
Similar experiences here.
All medical research is NOT a lie! The majority of the research involves a preplanned goal and the research is structured to achieve that endpoint! This is apparent in two 30 MILLION dollar NIH funded studies. The WHI of 20 years ago was to discredit the value of estrogen for bone health so Lilly could sell their targeted chemo drug that destroys the osteoblasts. Fast forward, and the VITAL study was underdosing Vitamin D but had the hidden agenda to push a refined Fish Oil as a Heart attack preventive. Since then they have extracted data from the study to continue to deny the true role Vitamin D has in maintaining immune system health as well as activating 3000 genes in our genome.
Also, the risk of dying from a virus is almost zero if your blood value is over 50ng's,. The problem is most Americans have a value of around half that! And those in the cellar are the greatest risk.
For more info go to: https://www.grassrootshealth.net/blog/go-part-2-3-vital-analysis-meet-nutrient-study-criteria-fracture-rates/?utm_source=newsletter-main&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Newsletters
The mRNA research is the crowning glory of manipulated research to achive a financially profitable end point. Other research is made up to prove coffee is better than tea. Or tea is better than coffe. Or there is health value in Hershey Chocolate. The list is long. Read "Science in the Private Interest" Read "
Sickening" Read another 100 plus books by physicans exposing the medical lies. DOES NO GOOD The Politicians in DC are all bought and paid for and will not stop this gross distortion of medical research for profit and not good health. Dr. Paul"s anger is stressing him out , need to step back and do some mind-body mediatation. When my BP becomes elevated, I know the stress of this mRNA nightmare is getting to me. My view!
Agree. And please forgive me, but one of the Geniuses of Substack , the stat wizard, I think it was matthew crawford, just did an entire essay about the infantlism and 2nd grade math of the CDC's own stats....was an eye opener....he castigated them up and down for not hiring people who know statistics...I am going to try and find it for you.
Marcia Angell, former EIC of the NEJM pointed this out 10 years ago. In China you now have buildings of medical writers using AI that can produce any paper you want with any results.
There's a lot of research that's a lie. Three days ago I read a climate researcher has been busted for false claims of ocean acidification and die-off of Australia's Great Barrier Reef because - climate change! The Barrier Reef had a die-off due to other reasons and is now rapidly recovering. You hear much about that? Of course not. There's a professor in Australia who's fighting for his job because he challenged the demise of these vast corral beds.
Wow! Fraud and criminal acts seem to be rampant everywhere! The morality of the professional class is defunct!
In 2003 I still haven’t gotten answers why my immune system crashed after ptsd & autoimmune disorders combo crashed my immune system.
We need to remove Rockefeller influence in medicine everywhere, over a hundred years now.
Papers I have read have been garbage. Even the abstract did not match the headline which was unsupported. Further, the method taken did not match or address the hypothesis that was supposedly being studied. Data was from a different cohort and a different illness. Even then it did not support the headline claim. The word "may" is used for a reason.
The Pfizer trial was another example. Really no difference between the test group and the placebo group and neither was exposed to infection at all, let alone in a controlled manner. Efficacy at prevention was not tested at all, yet a claim of 95% was made.
Also you have to remember that most experiments with animals/tissues are done in a lab under fluorescent or LED or other fake light conditions and not under natural light of the sun where nature functions best. It does make a difference to the way humans function ..... we need natural light for various bodily functions such as our body clock and signaling for hormones etc.
110% correct. Trust no research as it has been corrupt going back over 30 years or longer. It is designed to provide billions of dollar to fake researchers and then their fake reports enable fake big pharma drugs to be marketed.
Dr Paul, yes yes yes!
It's all bullshit, animal abuse.
How much can we trust Cochrane after they ejected Gotzsche? Not much. And there’s a rumor Cochrane was purchased by some huge company. I don’t know the truth.
Was this written by Richard Smith? I briefly scanned it and didn’t see an attribution. Sounds like his honest work. “Time to assume medical research is fraudulent until proven otherwise” was the title of his BMJ editorial last year. Apt, isn’t it?
https://youtu.be/OGWniRyuvVA
"But I am also still fantasizing of some place where the practice of medicine can still be undeniably helpful to human beings and society at large.", Dr. John P.A. Ioannidis
Sorry state we are in.
Why stop there? Virology is based on methods devoid of any controls, it all goes back to Enders sloppy isolation methods nearly 70 years ago which have not been seriously questioned or refuted.