An example of how Malone contorts the truth to then get his moronic inept, stupid lawyer to file frivilous DOA lawsuits; here he names SAGE HANA, myself (Paul Alexander), Jane Ruby, George Webb, yet
An example of how Malone contorts the truth to then get his moronic inept, stupid lawyer to file frivilous DOA lawsuits; here he names SAGE HANA, myself (Paul Alexander), Jane Ruby, George Webb, yet
if you read, you see slight at hand Malone & crooked lawyer played in text as he will use this to enter a court for slander but see here: "...played in creating the modified-mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines"
When speaking the truth jeopardizes your voice, you speak louder over the noise directed at you. May the voice of truth bring down the walls of Jericho.
If you will look over my earlier posts about Malone (and others) over a year ago, you will see my pointing out lapses in his criticism of the viral RNA products that are inexplicable given his (and others’) expertise. And it’s not any kind of esoteric expertise of the products’ primary mechanism of action, because I and many thousands of PhDs and graduate students in molecular/cell biology are extremely familiar with it because it’s a well-known mechanism that’s been used all the time for over 40 years for transfecting cells with exogenous gene constructs. The difference? We did it almost exclusively in stable cell lines in vitro. We did NOT use it to inject viral genes into living human subjects.
Paul, you completely missed the boat on this one and I’m truly surprised, given your background in the biological sciences, that you did so in such a spectacular and ahistorical fashion. You can read more on my substack page about the off-label use of cell transfection reagents and where they came from.
As I described it earlier this year [with contemporary comments in brackets]:
A FB friend asked me, “Why did Robert Malone invent the mrna product?” referring to the viral RNA products.
My response:
He didn’t. He adapted existing transfection techniques used to introduce exogenous gene constructs into cells in stable cell lines to attempt the same in multicellular living organisms.
1. So-called mRNA therapy is only a subset of the standard lab technique of transfection of genetic material into a cell that didn’t normally have it in such a way that wouldn’t kill the cell, the only difference was that it was being done in living animals instead of cell lines grown in flasks.
2. The idea behind “mRNA therapy” transfection was to introduce into an animal with a genetic defect that couldn’t produce something it needed or not enough of it or that produced a defective version of it, either
A. copies of the normal gene that could be used by the cells to produce enough of the correct product to offset the deficit and restore a measure of health [such as the gene for insulin in those who lost the insulin-producing cells through inflammatory activity in the course of a childhood infection] or
B. copies of a gene that will make anti-sense mRNA versions of the mRNA transcribed from the defective gene to interfere with it and prevent the defective gene product from being translated by the ribosomes.
If the problem in health was being caused by the presence of the defective proteins produced from the defective gene [such as dystrophin in muscular dystrophy] then using this type of mRNA could block the production of those defective proteins and restore health or at least reduce the level of impairment.
_________
But those guys of Covid, Inc. are NOT introducing a foreign gene into cells to restore lost function or to block malfunction and restore health.
They are introducing a foreign viral RNA gene into perfectly good cells to do this:
to disrupt normal cell function in a way that is damaging to those cells,
to produce a biologically-active viral protein that is damaging to that and other cells,
to cause those cells to signal to the innate immune system that they have been taken over by a virus, and
to cause the innate immune system to attack and kill those cells.
NONE of that is being done to restore lost function,
NONE of that is being done to disrupt malfunction,
NONE of that is being done to treat disease,
EVERYTHING their viral RNA products’ primary mechanism of action does and everything it results in is disease or consequences of disease.
This means that their purpose in using these techniques is not the delivery of therapeutic agents into sick cells to cure them or even chemotherapy agents into cancer cells to kill them, but the delivery of viral RNA into healthy cells to infect them and to trigger the innate immune system to destroy them.
Of course, the companies, in the very same way that they used the word “vaccine” to make their products (that had nothing in common with viral protein vaccines) appear to be something they were not, also played up the “mRNA therapy” angle of transfection to make their products sound more like medical treatment to reinforce the false claim that they are vaccines. [Like all con artists, they play off the knowledge and beliefs of their victims to sell them something false, useless, or harmful by making it appear other than it is or just another member of an existing trusted class].
This can clearly be see by what Wikipedia did to Robert Malone after he criticized the viral RNA products.
For years he was correctly described as having pioneered the use of transfection in vivo to introduce exogenous gene products for therapeutic purposes as I described above.
His criticism [and strangely very restrained public criticism as I have been noting for a very long time] was enough for Wikipedia to scrub him from their pages, drop him into the memory hole, and replace him with a woman from Pfizer/BioInTech and attribute to her his work in this area. They did this in order to accomplish two things:
1. Give Pfizer a seemingly plausible way of describing as something medical and therapeutic their crazier-than-fuck notion of infecting healthy cells in vivo in humans by the off-label use of both transfection reagents and Malone’s specific application of transfection techniques.
2. To prevent the general public, whose idea of researching a subject is to go to Wikipedia, from looking up Robert Malone and seeing that a major critic of the viral RNA products was the guy who pioneered what the viral RNA product manufacturers claim was the basis of their products’ primary mechanism of action—because that would make them look bad.
It would lead people to wonder what is wrong in the way the manufacturers are doing it that would lead Malone to criticize their products or whether he’s just trying to sabotage a wondrous new product.
So we have arrived at a point where
A. companies like Pfizer are trying to describe their products’ primary mechanism of action in such an ambiguous way that the general public will have no clue what’s actually going on and
B. people like Malone, McCullough and many others are criticizing the viral RNA products in almost every possible way EXCEPT their primary mechanism of action.
On the one hand, the companies don’t want to be identified as deliberately infecting billions of people with C19 viral RNA and bringing immunological hell down on the formerly healthy tissues and cells of their bodies after compromising through their products.
On the other hand, although Malone and others want to end the danger posed by these products, Malone is probably (and understandably) VERY reluctant, by drawing attention to the actual cause of the danger [the inevitable innate immune response to cells deliberately infected with viral protein as the result of the primary mechanism of action of the products] to suffer the risk of some morons stirring up the public by saying, “All this shit was YOUR fault for having the idea of sticking foreign genes into people.”* [Sort of EXACTLY what you just did above less than an hour ago]
Do you think that nobody could be so ignorant as to be unable to make valid distinctions between someone using a technique for therapeutic purposes to restore health and someone else misusing it to infect people with viral RNA, causing disease, and harming health?
Look at the history of people, especially ignorant people, being exploited by opportunists.
And, no doubt, all these scientists who are critics of the viral RNA products are also very fearful of having the irreplaceably valuable techniques of transfection that are the backbone of all biological and biomedical research trashed by association with the opportunistic off-label misuse of them by Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson&Johnson, and AstraZeneca.
I hope he loses all lawsuits and goes broke paying attorney fees. But maybe the funds are coming from his “connections” and his accusations about others’ connections are another slight of hand. Evil always accuses good of doing what evil is doing itself.
Headline From WND” ‘Completely failed to insist on the testing necessary'
Bob Unruh; By Bob Unruh
Published December 27, 2023 at 7:32pm
“Dr. Robert Malone jabs FDA for not addressing COVID-shot dangers”
Malone explained that Florida officials, including Dr. Ladapo, asked the FDA for information about how drug makers evaluated the "risk of human genome integration or mutagenesis of residual DNA contaminants from the mRNA COVID-19" shots.
So once again, I have copied the headline above from “WND” and part of the article’s explanation which Dr Malone has now “slammed” (with which I most certainly agree with) the FDA’s “safe and effective” nonsense and non-answer reply to Florida’s Surgeon General, Dr Ladapo’s letter.
One of two things, IMO has happened with Dr Malone.
1. He has fallen and bang his head for the better and is now speaking out against this “genetic manipulation” injection the way he should have from the very beginning or 2. He’s had a “I saw the light” moment! I’m not sure what has happened but Dr Malone’s response is certainly “spot on” as millions of
“non-medical professionals” have said from the onset! I certainly can’t imagine supporting Dr Malone ever but thought this was worth my time posting. Only time will tell how much and how soon Dr Malone will divulge the dangers and the depth of genetic manipulation these forced injections will cause as time passes. May God Bless America and The Entire World!
Dang, how many complaints has he filed against all who question him?
I wonder if he files motions to have them “filed under seal” so the public can’t read them.
I remember that happened in a patent litigation case and the judge denied it and I was instructed to file some of the attachments under seal but not the actual complaint. After reading the signed order...wowza Plaintiff’s counsel was put on notice. Ya don’t wanna piss a judge off!
Did you pass basic high school English? HOW did you ever get thru college, must less med school? Or was it the medical field with all those vaccines that injured you? Must have been. They definitely passed thru the blood-brain barrier. Such rage. To ignore someone is a much greater penalty than to talk about them all the time. Let's say you successfully pin all the blame on your nemesis, Maloney, what have you accomplished? Will you THEN finally go after Fauci or Klaus or Bourla or Daszak or anyone else truly culpable? Are YOU the distraction actually? Do you think taking Robert Malone down would solve Climate Change as well? How much of your brain does Robert Malone occupy? Is a sale or lease?
Perhaps if you could form intelligible articles with conceptual paragraphs, people could understand your babble. Speed reading takes the first and sometimes the last sentence from a paragraph. So if you've got a point, you better put it there. Jumbled rage is all I see from you.
(p.s. as always, please take your magnesium, 🙂, your loving PureBlood sycophant. 💝
as I tell my husband, the rage is coming from your heart that is lacking magnesium. And indeed, he is a loving sane man again 2 hours after taking his magnesium. Joint pain gone too. Which can reduce alot of rage, in and of itself!
(found with a search for "magnesium and the insane")
"A systematic review of 32 studies found that people with depression and other psychiatric conditions, like anxiety and obsessive compulsive disorder, were more likely to have lower magnesium levels. It also found that magnesium had some benefits on mild depression and anxiety, but not generalised anxiety disorder or panic disorder.")
Paul do you really think this is all original with your nemesis?
when i first saw him on the highwire, summer 2020 he was a squirrelly pharma lifer. and now he's the marlboro man?
really?
the persona is scripted beyond belief. reminds me of when the ny times tried to reinvent nick kristof (sp?) as a mac gyver type character. who's doing the scripting?
btw that zerohedge article was a paid placement. scroll down to right above the comments
When speaking the truth jeopardizes your voice, you speak louder over the noise directed at you. May the voice of truth bring down the walls of Jericho.
Sleight of hand.
If you will look over my earlier posts about Malone (and others) over a year ago, you will see my pointing out lapses in his criticism of the viral RNA products that are inexplicable given his (and others’) expertise. And it’s not any kind of esoteric expertise of the products’ primary mechanism of action, because I and many thousands of PhDs and graduate students in molecular/cell biology are extremely familiar with it because it’s a well-known mechanism that’s been used all the time for over 40 years for transfecting cells with exogenous gene constructs. The difference? We did it almost exclusively in stable cell lines in vitro. We did NOT use it to inject viral genes into living human subjects.
Dr. Paul Alexander, you are a man after my own heart. Keep going.
From July, 2023:
Paul, you completely missed the boat on this one and I’m truly surprised, given your background in the biological sciences, that you did so in such a spectacular and ahistorical fashion. You can read more on my substack page about the off-label use of cell transfection reagents and where they came from.
As I described it earlier this year [with contemporary comments in brackets]:
A FB friend asked me, “Why did Robert Malone invent the mrna product?” referring to the viral RNA products.
My response:
He didn’t. He adapted existing transfection techniques used to introduce exogenous gene constructs into cells in stable cell lines to attempt the same in multicellular living organisms.
1. So-called mRNA therapy is only a subset of the standard lab technique of transfection of genetic material into a cell that didn’t normally have it in such a way that wouldn’t kill the cell, the only difference was that it was being done in living animals instead of cell lines grown in flasks.
2. The idea behind “mRNA therapy” transfection was to introduce into an animal with a genetic defect that couldn’t produce something it needed or not enough of it or that produced a defective version of it, either
A. copies of the normal gene that could be used by the cells to produce enough of the correct product to offset the deficit and restore a measure of health [such as the gene for insulin in those who lost the insulin-producing cells through inflammatory activity in the course of a childhood infection] or
B. copies of a gene that will make anti-sense mRNA versions of the mRNA transcribed from the defective gene to interfere with it and prevent the defective gene product from being translated by the ribosomes.
If the problem in health was being caused by the presence of the defective proteins produced from the defective gene [such as dystrophin in muscular dystrophy] then using this type of mRNA could block the production of those defective proteins and restore health or at least reduce the level of impairment.
_________
But those guys of Covid, Inc. are NOT introducing a foreign gene into cells to restore lost function or to block malfunction and restore health.
They are introducing a foreign viral RNA gene into perfectly good cells to do this:
to disrupt normal cell function in a way that is damaging to those cells,
to produce a biologically-active viral protein that is damaging to that and other cells,
to cause those cells to signal to the innate immune system that they have been taken over by a virus, and
to cause the innate immune system to attack and kill those cells.
NONE of that is being done to restore lost function,
NONE of that is being done to disrupt malfunction,
NONE of that is being done to treat disease,
EVERYTHING their viral RNA products’ primary mechanism of action does and everything it results in is disease or consequences of disease.
This means that their purpose in using these techniques is not the delivery of therapeutic agents into sick cells to cure them or even chemotherapy agents into cancer cells to kill them, but the delivery of viral RNA into healthy cells to infect them and to trigger the innate immune system to destroy them.
Of course, the companies, in the very same way that they used the word “vaccine” to make their products (that had nothing in common with viral protein vaccines) appear to be something they were not, also played up the “mRNA therapy” angle of transfection to make their products sound more like medical treatment to reinforce the false claim that they are vaccines. [Like all con artists, they play off the knowledge and beliefs of their victims to sell them something false, useless, or harmful by making it appear other than it is or just another member of an existing trusted class].
This can clearly be see by what Wikipedia did to Robert Malone after he criticized the viral RNA products.
For years he was correctly described as having pioneered the use of transfection in vivo to introduce exogenous gene products for therapeutic purposes as I described above.
His criticism [and strangely very restrained public criticism as I have been noting for a very long time] was enough for Wikipedia to scrub him from their pages, drop him into the memory hole, and replace him with a woman from Pfizer/BioInTech and attribute to her his work in this area. They did this in order to accomplish two things:
1. Give Pfizer a seemingly plausible way of describing as something medical and therapeutic their crazier-than-fuck notion of infecting healthy cells in vivo in humans by the off-label use of both transfection reagents and Malone’s specific application of transfection techniques.
2. To prevent the general public, whose idea of researching a subject is to go to Wikipedia, from looking up Robert Malone and seeing that a major critic of the viral RNA products was the guy who pioneered what the viral RNA product manufacturers claim was the basis of their products’ primary mechanism of action—because that would make them look bad.
It would lead people to wonder what is wrong in the way the manufacturers are doing it that would lead Malone to criticize their products or whether he’s just trying to sabotage a wondrous new product.
So we have arrived at a point where
A. companies like Pfizer are trying to describe their products’ primary mechanism of action in such an ambiguous way that the general public will have no clue what’s actually going on and
B. people like Malone, McCullough and many others are criticizing the viral RNA products in almost every possible way EXCEPT their primary mechanism of action.
On the one hand, the companies don’t want to be identified as deliberately infecting billions of people with C19 viral RNA and bringing immunological hell down on the formerly healthy tissues and cells of their bodies after compromising through their products.
On the other hand, although Malone and others want to end the danger posed by these products, Malone is probably (and understandably) VERY reluctant, by drawing attention to the actual cause of the danger [the inevitable innate immune response to cells deliberately infected with viral protein as the result of the primary mechanism of action of the products] to suffer the risk of some morons stirring up the public by saying, “All this shit was YOUR fault for having the idea of sticking foreign genes into people.”* [Sort of EXACTLY what you just did above less than an hour ago]
Do you think that nobody could be so ignorant as to be unable to make valid distinctions between someone using a technique for therapeutic purposes to restore health and someone else misusing it to infect people with viral RNA, causing disease, and harming health?
Look at the history of people, especially ignorant people, being exploited by opportunists.
And, no doubt, all these scientists who are critics of the viral RNA products are also very fearful of having the irreplaceably valuable techniques of transfection that are the backbone of all biological and biomedical research trashed by association with the opportunistic off-label misuse of them by Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson&Johnson, and AstraZeneca.
_________
Thanks, Paul. You are definitely on to him. The sooner everyone else is, the better.
I hope he loses all lawsuits and goes broke paying attorney fees. But maybe the funds are coming from his “connections” and his accusations about others’ connections are another slight of hand. Evil always accuses good of doing what evil is doing itself.
Headline From WND” ‘Completely failed to insist on the testing necessary'
Bob Unruh; By Bob Unruh
Published December 27, 2023 at 7:32pm
“Dr. Robert Malone jabs FDA for not addressing COVID-shot dangers”
Malone explained that Florida officials, including Dr. Ladapo, asked the FDA for information about how drug makers evaluated the "risk of human genome integration or mutagenesis of residual DNA contaminants from the mRNA COVID-19" shots.
So once again, I have copied the headline above from “WND” and part of the article’s explanation which Dr Malone has now “slammed” (with which I most certainly agree with) the FDA’s “safe and effective” nonsense and non-answer reply to Florida’s Surgeon General, Dr Ladapo’s letter.
One of two things, IMO has happened with Dr Malone.
1. He has fallen and bang his head for the better and is now speaking out against this “genetic manipulation” injection the way he should have from the very beginning or 2. He’s had a “I saw the light” moment! I’m not sure what has happened but Dr Malone’s response is certainly “spot on” as millions of
“non-medical professionals” have said from the onset! I certainly can’t imagine supporting Dr Malone ever but thought this was worth my time posting. Only time will tell how much and how soon Dr Malone will divulge the dangers and the depth of genetic manipulation these forced injections will cause as time passes. May God Bless America and The Entire World!
AJR
Dang, how many complaints has he filed against all who question him?
I wonder if he files motions to have them “filed under seal” so the public can’t read them.
I remember that happened in a patent litigation case and the judge denied it and I was instructed to file some of the attachments under seal but not the actual complaint. After reading the signed order...wowza Plaintiff’s counsel was put on notice. Ya don’t wanna piss a judge off!
Just curious if he does the same thing.
This might be the next grift. He is in the pipeline of a potentially incoming play.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/the-next-pandemic-is?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1087020&post_id=140136757&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=u4acs&utm_medium=email
Did you pass basic high school English? HOW did you ever get thru college, must less med school? Or was it the medical field with all those vaccines that injured you? Must have been. They definitely passed thru the blood-brain barrier. Such rage. To ignore someone is a much greater penalty than to talk about them all the time. Let's say you successfully pin all the blame on your nemesis, Maloney, what have you accomplished? Will you THEN finally go after Fauci or Klaus or Bourla or Daszak or anyone else truly culpable? Are YOU the distraction actually? Do you think taking Robert Malone down would solve Climate Change as well? How much of your brain does Robert Malone occupy? Is a sale or lease?
Perhaps if you could form intelligible articles with conceptual paragraphs, people could understand your babble. Speed reading takes the first and sometimes the last sentence from a paragraph. So if you've got a point, you better put it there. Jumbled rage is all I see from you.
(p.s. as always, please take your magnesium, 🙂, your loving PureBlood sycophant. 💝
as I tell my husband, the rage is coming from your heart that is lacking magnesium. And indeed, he is a loving sane man again 2 hours after taking his magnesium. Joint pain gone too. Which can reduce alot of rage, in and of itself!
(found with a search for "magnesium and the insane")
https://patient.info/news-and-features/can-magnesium-help-with-anxiety#:~:text=A%20systematic%20review%20of%2032%20studies%20found%20that,but%20not%20generalised%20anxiety%20disorder%20or%20panic%20disorder.
"A systematic review of 32 studies found that people with depression and other psychiatric conditions, like anxiety and obsessive compulsive disorder, were more likely to have lower magnesium levels. It also found that magnesium had some benefits on mild depression and anxiety, but not generalised anxiety disorder or panic disorder.")
Paul do you really think this is all original with your nemesis?
when i first saw him on the highwire, summer 2020 he was a squirrelly pharma lifer. and now he's the marlboro man?
really?
the persona is scripted beyond belief. reminds me of when the ny times tried to reinvent nick kristof (sp?) as a mac gyver type character. who's doing the scripting?
btw that zerohedge article was a paid placement. scroll down to right above the comments
https://www.zerohedge.com/sponsored-post/dr-malone-versus-world-why-he-war-everyone