6 Comments

The shots didn't stop the disease and in fact they cause life threatening disease. The highly trained medical professionals put on their masks, lowered their heads, and followed orders, thereby violating the hippocratic oath. SHAME ON THOSE WHO KNEW AND SAID NOTHING!!!

The tragic irony is they took the shots too!

Expand full comment

True!

Expand full comment

The much simpler hypothesis:

The innate immune system, in addition to what it does when encountering viruses and bacteria in the extracellular fluid compartment, works closely with other processes such as apoptosis (regulated by the mitochondria) and intracellular detection of viral genes and viral RNA inside of cells.

Apoptosis, known also as “programmed cell death,” is initiated when individual cells have been detected as going off their developmental reservation. It takes out cells before they can get too far gone and cause serious trouble. The innate immune system and apoptosis daily knock off and clean up the debris from sick cells, damaged cells, mutated cells, and cells invaded by viral pathogens.

Internal sensors inside of cells can detect viral genes and viral protein inside of cells and signal the innate immune system that those cells have been compromised by a virus that is now in replication mode and are in need of being destroyed by innate immune inflammatory attacks launched by the innate immune system.

If there has been an increase amongst those treated with viral RNA products of different types of cancer, it could be one of two things:

A. Something in the viral RNA products is causing an increase in the frequency of neoplastic events, leading to an apparent increase in the frequency of cancers.

B. The frequency of neoplastic events remains the same but the viral RNA products do something that interferes with the deranged cells being detected and eliminated as usual.

The simpler of the two explanations is B.

With a normally functioning innate and adaptive immune system, most trouble is eliminated before it can ever be consciously noticed. That is, for the innate and adaptive immune system functioning normally, their capacity is capable of dealing with most of the typical problems these systems are designed to handle.

Problems can arise in two ways:

1. Either the innate and adaptive immune systems are impaired and cannot handle the usual requirements for detection, destruction, and clean-up of the problem cells.

An analogy of this would be a perfectly run little hamlet with the police and fire departments suddenly having a sizable percentage of personnel out sick. There’s not enough police and fire department personnel available to handle the typical load of trouble and some things that one would normally never see can slip by and get a foothold. Like opportunistic diseases.

2. Or the innate immune and adaptive immune systems are operating normally, but the challenges they face are increased to the point that the immune systems are incapable of being up-regulated quickly enough to fully deal with the challenges and something escapes the immune systems’ notice and is able to get out of hand.

An analogy of this would be a perfectly run little hamlet with sufficient police and fire personnel to handle all usual problems but, for some reason, the hamlet finds itself being overrun with an unusually high number of crooks from a nearby city. The problem is a mismatch between normal resources and abnormal demands placed on them by an increase in the total number of things going bad.

The chances that a whole bunch of people are suddenly becoming immune-impaired and depleted on the supply side are lower than a whole bunch of people getting infected with something that transiently overwhelms the available immune resources.

After all, when serious viral disease hits, this is exactly what happens. And when it happens to people in 1 with impaired immune systems, the outcome is only exacerbated.

Why does this happen?

Because, like almost all physiological processes, the functions of the immune systems can be upregulated or downregulated as needed, but they cannot do this instantly. If, during the period of time it takes to get upregulated, the agent challenging it all is abundant enough, the immune resources will be insufficient to deal both with the increased challenge and all its constitutive tasks. And that is when things can get out of hand, whether infectious disease or neoplastic disease.

So, what happens when you get shot up with a viral RNA product? They are designed to escape notice of the innate immune system. They are designed to invade any cell they bump into, infect them with viral genes, and hijack them to produce the viral protein coded for by the viral gene.

When this happens, you have cells all over the body in multiple organ systems producing viral protein from the viral genes. To the innate immune system this appears to be a highly infective virus that has eluded detection and has infected cells in a variety of organ systems. The unavoidable and necessary response is to trigger strong, widespread innate immune inflammatory attacks. With this and with having to deal with lone spike proteins escaping those cells, the innate capacity of the immune systems to deal with the usual requirements is outstripped and things that were normally dealt with without you ever becoming aware of it now have an increased likelihood of getting out of hand before the innate immune system can be upregulated sufficiently to deal with them and bad things start showing up.

Of course, given the viral RNA products ability to invade and infect almost any cell, if some of those cells are the relatively limited stem cells of the hematopoietic system, you could end up with a situation where the innate or adaptive immune system may never be upregulated sufficiently to deal with the challenge.

And the more times someone gets shot up with a viral RNA product, the greater the chance that his innate and adaptive immune stems cells will suffer from innate immune inflammatory attacks, making those people even more likely to suffer serious repercussions.

Expand full comment

As a cancer survivor and an individual with an autoimmune history, it made ZERO sense that the FDA/CDC or doctors trained in these areas would just accept the supposed safety and efficacy of these novel gene therapy vaccines. Seriously, defies reason and common sense. Furthermore, they gave medical advice...”safe and effective” with no evidence to justify these claims. The drug companies openly stated that the vaccines had not been tested on the compromised...pregnant, cancer patients, elderly, those suffering from autoimmune disease....YET those are the first ones that the government said should get the jab. Begs some serious questions?

A sane and just society protects its vulnerable, our government did just the opposite. Leaves one wondering if part of the intent was the elimination of those whose existence is costly.

Expand full comment
Jan 3Edited

Indeed. Nothing sane about this fraud.! I remember clearly, Bourla saying the immonocomoromised will not be able to take the jab and that is what the monoclonal antibodies will be used for. That was at the beginning of the roleout.

Expand full comment