Another view on Fenbendazole? DR. COLLEEN HUBER says so & I wrote on Fenbendazole as an anti-cancer therapeutic yet HUBER clarifies points that you should know! Balance is key & both sides, I find
Another view on Fenbendazole? DR. COLLEEN HUBER says so & I wrote on Fenbendazole as an anti-cancer therapeutic yet HUBER clarifies points that you should know! Balance is key & both sides, I find
HUBER is raising key points we should consider! You know I am against current cancer treatment for to me, it was all a fraud money making! Yet is she overstating liver damage? More common in animals?
Having watched numerous friends and relatives die of cancer that killed them very quickly, which was hastened by the chemo and radiation as well, I would take my chance on Fenbendazole. Most of these people were given 5 weeks to live. The couldn’t eat after every chemo treatment and were sick as dogs every week they took them and then died at the 5-6 week interval. The cancer industry tells these people to also quit all beneficial supplements while taking the chemo/radiation which is nonsense. If my prognoses would be this bad, then I would give Ivermectin and Fenbendazole a chance right away. I’ve read too many stories where people were given the death sentence of 4-5 weeks and took the Ivermectin and Fenbendazole and fully recovered. If there is risk to the liver, once you know the cancer is in remission, then take the supplements that help detox and heal your liver like NAC, Milk Thistle, etc.
In the Joe Tippens Protocol you do not just take FB. People in remission take it 3 days on, 4 days rest. Only people with active cancers take it daily. You stop all sugars, take berberine with every meal and a high dose bioavailable curcumin. Many also take CBD oil. I also take turkey tail mushrooms twice a day. Liver support supps are recommended. I take milk thistle, Tudca & taurine. And getting your liver values tested every 3-6 months is also recommended. I’ll get my liver test results back next week. She is correct that there are lots of fakes out there. One brand from Eastern Europe was tested and found to be only 7% Fenbendozole. And they’re not cheap! Which is why Joe says to only take the very affordable Merck brands Panacur C or Safeguard. I got booted from a substack for pointing that out to people because the dude sells his own brand of Fenbendozole. That makes me very suspect. Why not simply show a certificate of authenticity if you’re legit? I use Safeguard. And it needs to be taken with a fat or oil, so I slug it down with organic olive oil. If my liver values go up (they’re normally in the low twenties) I’ll report back.
more seriously then a non medical Dr "naturopath's" perspective who appears to have an axe to grind on the basis of a single patient that she heard about in her naturopath clinic in a case she is not actively involved in. Ironically she then cites bigpharma papers designed to instill fear and doubt in a cheap repurposed compound. (sound familiar) as per Dr. Makis
"So why are there no Fenbendazole Clinical Trials for Cancer?
The answer seems rather obvious: it’s very cheap, it’s safe and it seems to be very effective.
Fenbendazole is not going to make anyone rich, and in cancer treatments, that is a non-starter."
Since you partially quoted part of my comment let me put the entire comment I posed to put it in perspective
"You are overstating liver damage caused by fenbendazole that is actually more common as a problem in animals and is a rare side effect in humans. I do agree that that no magic bullet exists for any disease and a holisitc approach is called for. As a care giver thanks to Fenbendazole I was able to bring back a stage 3 Multiple Myeloma patient who correctly rejected a toxic chemo therapy/useless stem cell approach (harvesting his own stem cells) who was given a grim prognosis of 2 months to live to100 percent full remission in seven months.
However, it called for much more than just Fenbendazole. I had to make sure that his glucose intake was eliminated ie - he enjoyed a few bottles of wine ever day that i convinecd him needed to be eliminated and substituted this with canaboid oil that also has some anticancer properties and had a way of relieving his anxiety.
Substituting sugar with allulose was crucial. supplementing vitamins etc and the list goes on.
i am a fan of the Warburg effect and little doubt in my mind that cancer is a metabolic disorder.
Hence depriving hypoxic cancer cells of glucose and glutamite that resort to mitochondria relying on fermentation to produce energy via lactate instead of oxidative phosphorylation generating AtP is crucial.
Are you going to tell us next that these Dr's at Stanford that studied these three patients who were at death's door and saved by Fenbendazole are promoting "street drugs"?
I just posted the following on Dr Huber's article:
If you had a patient come in with toxicity from acetaminophen, what's the first question? "What dosage was the patient taking?" of course.
This article seems to highlight on instances where patients were possibly taking dosages outside the typical "Tippens Protocol" recommendation of 222mg Fenben 3 days on, 4 days off.
Regarding the patient bloodwork prominently posted in this article...Dr Huber, you note in another comment: "My understanding is that the patient was taking 1 or 2 caps per day, uncertain of dose, for some weeks and for most days, until we implored stopping it. This was from an online vendor. Then the liver labs started moving toward normal." So...the patient dosage was unknown.
When I look online at such as Amazon, I see they sell both 222mg and 444mg Fenben capsules...I really don't know why they sell the 444mg, when it's double the typical protocol.
In other words, the patient was taking perhaps 222mg most days...or possibly 444mg depending on the caps...or possibly (when taking 2 caps) 444mg or 888mg ... in other words, it's unknown the dosage the patient was taking, and taking that unknown on contiguous days. In other words, the patient could've been taking 1-4X or more possibly the recommended dosage/day. And if taking a higher dosage every single day without the typical 3 days on, 4 days off, it seems unsurprising that toxicity could occur.
Or take #3 referenced link from NIH, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8255718/ - when a person digs in, it says: "She stated her fenbendazole schedule consisted of 1 g/day PO for 3 days, followed by 4 days off, and this schedule had been maintained for approximately 1 month from early July until her August visit. We stopped fenbendazole administration immediately, and her liver function parameters gradually improved."
In other words, this patient was taking the standard 3 days on, 4 days off protocol...but at 1g/day, she was taking 4.5X the recommended 222mg dosage. Correct me if I'm off base, but taking 4.5X recommended dosage of most anything can have adverse effects, correct? Please try taking 4.5X of acetaminophen ... no, just kidding, please don't!!!! But therefore, should we demonize acetaminophen because it's possible to take damaging dosages.
I'd have found this article much higher on the validity scale if I didn't have to dig in and locate these hidden facts, that should've been prominently noted as "when taking ANYTHING don't mess around with higher dosages/frequency than recommended." Disclaimer: I've been taking the standard Fenben protocol most weeks for the last two years or so, some weeks off here and there. I had a right radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma over 5.5yrs ago, and I added Fenben as part of my protocol to help prevent recurrence. I also daily take NAC, SAM-e, C, garlic, etc ... items that happen to be liver supportive among with other other benefits.
I became very familiar with Mebendazole in 1990, when the very first autistic child I had ever seen came into my pediatric office for the treatment of worms. I Rx'ed mebendazole (then called Vermox).
The mo called me up later that day and asked me what I had given her son as he was making better eye contact, was more verbal and social. I had to say I had no idea how mebendazole worked, so I called Janssen who was making it at the time and they told me it worked by blocking molecules of a certain molecular weight from being transported across cell membranes.
In the case of the pin worms they starved to death because glucose was being blocked and they couldn't absorb it. I decide this child either had something in his gut that shouldn't be there or he had something in his gut that we all have but for him it was messing with his brain.
It took me a couple of years to figure out the mebendazole was blocking Gluten metabolites. Well, there went my Nobel Prize because if I was right the solution is to stop eating gluten, not take a medicine that block gluten absorption.
But the take home message was that autism was not a psychiatric disorder, but a medical/metabolic disorder and there was at least one intervention.... that is how I started working with autistic children, but that is another story.
Dr. Huber's article is a total hit piece just like our so called science experts did with hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. If you actually read the #1 Nature article from 2018 that she lists as a reference for her article it talks about the multiple ways that fenbendazole works against non small cell lung cancer NSCLC. It also talks about how non toxic fenbendazole is and how it works to kill cancer cells but spares normal body cells. It is not toxic to the liver. It talks about the multiple great mechanisms of action that fenbendazole has against cancer cells that was shown by their research. By the way, a mild to moderate increase in liver enzymes does not mean that you have done great harm to the liver. You could have an increase in liver enzymes from the liver having to detox and process the dying cancer cells. Think of the mass of some of these tumors and what has to happen to all of the dead and dying cancer cells to rid your body of the debri. "They do not have effective treatment for NSCLC or glioblastoma of the brain with their toxic chemo drugs or radiation or immunotherapy but fenbendazole has cured both of those types of cancers in multiple cases. I would be treating myself with fenben and ivermectin along with taking other helpful supplements like curcumin, vit D, Vit C and so on. Mebendazole is a similar drug to fenben and it is licensed for humans and had a lot of studies done in the past that showed it worked on various cancers. I don't know, I am only guessing on this, but I suspect it was used to kill parasitic infections in humans and when they found out it worked against cancer they couldn't let that happen or it would kill the cancer treatment industrial complex and show the world that they have been lied to. I suspect the powers that be did not want that information to get out to the general public so they basically made it unavailable and outrageously priced/pill. They are feeling the heat on fenbendazole because more and more information about it is getting out on the internet, X , and yes, Joe Rogan. When Joe Tippens was the only person in the clinical trial of 1,100 people at M.D. Anderson whose NSCLC was cured when he was taking fenbendazole on his own in 2017 and M.D. Anderson knows that fenben is what cured him, do you think they started using it in their cancer treatment???? Not!
Excellent article to point out the downsides of Fenbendazole. Every drug has effects and side effects, some are not good for the patient.
It's not a panacea and proper care must be taken before using any drug. Best to get advice from professionals who have had success treating these patients, they have a lot more experience. Of course, avoid the money grubbing Cancer Industry types.
Here we go again .. the horse or the cart.. most drugs that work on animals .. will work on humans... the dosing is all about body weight and drug load .. because the liver has to detoxify any excess.... fenbendazole is cheaper than menbendazole(human version) but equally effective if taken at 222mg per day... you need NAC (detox)sillimarin (repair)to help the liver raise glutathione levels as it rids pathogen or dead parasites as some will reside in the liver itself which explains these higher readings that suggest the liver is struggling.Use ivermectin this way too.. a maintenance dose if you live in tropical areas.
So the regime should mimic chemo .. 3 days on 2 days off .. first week ...second week 3 days on 4 days off third week.. 1 day on 6 days off .. this is because parasites have a survival mechanism.. the mother lays eggs that stay in clumps like “cysts” if she starts to die.. she releases a hormone to cause eggs to hatch..so as you kill .. you give the parasite a chance of staying in the body ...so on /off protocol gradually reduces the numbers of each new generation.
Wow, you are continually reposting nonsense that has already been refuted both here and on the original substack. You are no different than those that pushed disinformation about ivermectin andHydroxychloroquine. imagine giving credence to someone by reposting who refers to a compounds that have peer reviewed studies showing efficacy as "urban legend" or "street meds".
Having watched numerous friends and relatives die of cancer that killed them very quickly, which was hastened by the chemo and radiation as well, I would take my chance on Fenbendazole. Most of these people were given 5 weeks to live. The couldn’t eat after every chemo treatment and were sick as dogs every week they took them and then died at the 5-6 week interval. The cancer industry tells these people to also quit all beneficial supplements while taking the chemo/radiation which is nonsense. If my prognoses would be this bad, then I would give Ivermectin and Fenbendazole a chance right away. I’ve read too many stories where people were given the death sentence of 4-5 weeks and took the Ivermectin and Fenbendazole and fully recovered. If there is risk to the liver, once you know the cancer is in remission, then take the supplements that help detox and heal your liver like NAC, Milk Thistle, etc.
OK, Dr. Huber, what is going to kill you first: the jab-induced turbo cancer or fenbendazole?
In the Joe Tippens Protocol you do not just take FB. People in remission take it 3 days on, 4 days rest. Only people with active cancers take it daily. You stop all sugars, take berberine with every meal and a high dose bioavailable curcumin. Many also take CBD oil. I also take turkey tail mushrooms twice a day. Liver support supps are recommended. I take milk thistle, Tudca & taurine. And getting your liver values tested every 3-6 months is also recommended. I’ll get my liver test results back next week. She is correct that there are lots of fakes out there. One brand from Eastern Europe was tested and found to be only 7% Fenbendozole. And they’re not cheap! Which is why Joe says to only take the very affordable Merck brands Panacur C or Safeguard. I got booted from a substack for pointing that out to people because the dude sells his own brand of Fenbendozole. That makes me very suspect. Why not simply show a certificate of authenticity if you’re legit? I use Safeguard. And it needs to be taken with a fat or oil, so I slug it down with organic olive oil. If my liver values go up (they’re normally in the low twenties) I’ll report back.
I would tend to consider a world class oncologist like Dr. William Makis view
https://makismd.substack.com/p/fenbendazole-and-cancer-at-least?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
more seriously then a non medical Dr "naturopath's" perspective who appears to have an axe to grind on the basis of a single patient that she heard about in her naturopath clinic in a case she is not actively involved in. Ironically she then cites bigpharma papers designed to instill fear and doubt in a cheap repurposed compound. (sound familiar) as per Dr. Makis
"So why are there no Fenbendazole Clinical Trials for Cancer?
The answer seems rather obvious: it’s very cheap, it’s safe and it seems to be very effective.
Fenbendazole is not going to make anyone rich, and in cancer treatments, that is a non-starter."
Since you partially quoted part of my comment let me put the entire comment I posed to put it in perspective
"You are overstating liver damage caused by fenbendazole that is actually more common as a problem in animals and is a rare side effect in humans. I do agree that that no magic bullet exists for any disease and a holisitc approach is called for. As a care giver thanks to Fenbendazole I was able to bring back a stage 3 Multiple Myeloma patient who correctly rejected a toxic chemo therapy/useless stem cell approach (harvesting his own stem cells) who was given a grim prognosis of 2 months to live to100 percent full remission in seven months.
However, it called for much more than just Fenbendazole. I had to make sure that his glucose intake was eliminated ie - he enjoyed a few bottles of wine ever day that i convinecd him needed to be eliminated and substituted this with canaboid oil that also has some anticancer properties and had a way of relieving his anxiety.
Substituting sugar with allulose was crucial. supplementing vitamins etc and the list goes on.
i am a fan of the Warburg effect and little doubt in my mind that cancer is a metabolic disorder.
Hence depriving hypoxic cancer cells of glucose and glutamite that resort to mitochondria relying on fermentation to produce energy via lactate instead of oxidative phosphorylation generating AtP is crucial.
Are you going to tell us next that these Dr's at Stanford that studied these three patients who were at death's door and saved by Fenbendazole are promoting "street drugs"?
https://www.scitechnol.com/peer-review/fenbendazole-enhancing-antitumor-effect-a-case-series-2Kms.php?article_id=14307"
I am disappointed that you would repost such drivel.
She says “mild” effects on liver. You can’t say that about Tylenol, and no one is speaking out about that. WHY?
I just posted the following on Dr Huber's article:
If you had a patient come in with toxicity from acetaminophen, what's the first question? "What dosage was the patient taking?" of course.
This article seems to highlight on instances where patients were possibly taking dosages outside the typical "Tippens Protocol" recommendation of 222mg Fenben 3 days on, 4 days off.
Regarding the patient bloodwork prominently posted in this article...Dr Huber, you note in another comment: "My understanding is that the patient was taking 1 or 2 caps per day, uncertain of dose, for some weeks and for most days, until we implored stopping it. This was from an online vendor. Then the liver labs started moving toward normal." So...the patient dosage was unknown.
When I look online at such as Amazon, I see they sell both 222mg and 444mg Fenben capsules...I really don't know why they sell the 444mg, when it's double the typical protocol.
In other words, the patient was taking perhaps 222mg most days...or possibly 444mg depending on the caps...or possibly (when taking 2 caps) 444mg or 888mg ... in other words, it's unknown the dosage the patient was taking, and taking that unknown on contiguous days. In other words, the patient could've been taking 1-4X or more possibly the recommended dosage/day. And if taking a higher dosage every single day without the typical 3 days on, 4 days off, it seems unsurprising that toxicity could occur.
Or take #3 referenced link from NIH, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8255718/ - when a person digs in, it says: "She stated her fenbendazole schedule consisted of 1 g/day PO for 3 days, followed by 4 days off, and this schedule had been maintained for approximately 1 month from early July until her August visit. We stopped fenbendazole administration immediately, and her liver function parameters gradually improved."
In other words, this patient was taking the standard 3 days on, 4 days off protocol...but at 1g/day, she was taking 4.5X the recommended 222mg dosage. Correct me if I'm off base, but taking 4.5X recommended dosage of most anything can have adverse effects, correct? Please try taking 4.5X of acetaminophen ... no, just kidding, please don't!!!! But therefore, should we demonize acetaminophen because it's possible to take damaging dosages.
I'd have found this article much higher on the validity scale if I didn't have to dig in and locate these hidden facts, that should've been prominently noted as "when taking ANYTHING don't mess around with higher dosages/frequency than recommended." Disclaimer: I've been taking the standard Fenben protocol most weeks for the last two years or so, some weeks off here and there. I had a right radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma over 5.5yrs ago, and I added Fenben as part of my protocol to help prevent recurrence. I also daily take NAC, SAM-e, C, garlic, etc ... items that happen to be liver supportive among with other other benefits.
I became very familiar with Mebendazole in 1990, when the very first autistic child I had ever seen came into my pediatric office for the treatment of worms. I Rx'ed mebendazole (then called Vermox).
The mo called me up later that day and asked me what I had given her son as he was making better eye contact, was more verbal and social. I had to say I had no idea how mebendazole worked, so I called Janssen who was making it at the time and they told me it worked by blocking molecules of a certain molecular weight from being transported across cell membranes.
In the case of the pin worms they starved to death because glucose was being blocked and they couldn't absorb it. I decide this child either had something in his gut that shouldn't be there or he had something in his gut that we all have but for him it was messing with his brain.
It took me a couple of years to figure out the mebendazole was blocking Gluten metabolites. Well, there went my Nobel Prize because if I was right the solution is to stop eating gluten, not take a medicine that block gluten absorption.
But the take home message was that autism was not a psychiatric disorder, but a medical/metabolic disorder and there was at least one intervention.... that is how I started working with autistic children, but that is another story.
Read Fen Ben's comments on her substack. He refures every one of her claims.
Dr. Huber's article is a total hit piece just like our so called science experts did with hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. If you actually read the #1 Nature article from 2018 that she lists as a reference for her article it talks about the multiple ways that fenbendazole works against non small cell lung cancer NSCLC. It also talks about how non toxic fenbendazole is and how it works to kill cancer cells but spares normal body cells. It is not toxic to the liver. It talks about the multiple great mechanisms of action that fenbendazole has against cancer cells that was shown by their research. By the way, a mild to moderate increase in liver enzymes does not mean that you have done great harm to the liver. You could have an increase in liver enzymes from the liver having to detox and process the dying cancer cells. Think of the mass of some of these tumors and what has to happen to all of the dead and dying cancer cells to rid your body of the debri. "They do not have effective treatment for NSCLC or glioblastoma of the brain with their toxic chemo drugs or radiation or immunotherapy but fenbendazole has cured both of those types of cancers in multiple cases. I would be treating myself with fenben and ivermectin along with taking other helpful supplements like curcumin, vit D, Vit C and so on. Mebendazole is a similar drug to fenben and it is licensed for humans and had a lot of studies done in the past that showed it worked on various cancers. I don't know, I am only guessing on this, but I suspect it was used to kill parasitic infections in humans and when they found out it worked against cancer they couldn't let that happen or it would kill the cancer treatment industrial complex and show the world that they have been lied to. I suspect the powers that be did not want that information to get out to the general public so they basically made it unavailable and outrageously priced/pill. They are feeling the heat on fenbendazole because more and more information about it is getting out on the internet, X , and yes, Joe Rogan. When Joe Tippens was the only person in the clinical trial of 1,100 people at M.D. Anderson whose NSCLC was cured when he was taking fenbendazole on his own in 2017 and M.D. Anderson knows that fenben is what cured him, do you think they started using it in their cancer treatment???? Not!
This article has just a little merit to it so it’s not technically misinformation
Yes I have seen seen ALT and AST levels go up in less than 20% of the people taking it.I have been doing this since 2009. Never charged a dollar 💵
But the cancer goes away and the levels stabilize
I’d rather see slightly elevated enzymes for a brief period than watch carcino embryonic antigens rise and the person die
I have >90% success rate.
Just this year I’ve watched baseball size brain tumors and
Liver
Kidney
Bladder
Stomach
Neck tumor
Melanomas
Non single cell lung c
Single cell lung c
absolutely cleared taking FBZ complimented with a few other protocols
FBZ is just one of the tools I use.
The rest are mainly plant based
Don’t let this article scare you outta saving your own life
FBZ works.
In my opinion.
You would be grossly uninformed and under experienced not to include it
Excellent article to point out the downsides of Fenbendazole. Every drug has effects and side effects, some are not good for the patient.
It's not a panacea and proper care must be taken before using any drug. Best to get advice from professionals who have had success treating these patients, they have a lot more experience. Of course, avoid the money grubbing Cancer Industry types.
Here we go again .. the horse or the cart.. most drugs that work on animals .. will work on humans... the dosing is all about body weight and drug load .. because the liver has to detoxify any excess.... fenbendazole is cheaper than menbendazole(human version) but equally effective if taken at 222mg per day... you need NAC (detox)sillimarin (repair)to help the liver raise glutathione levels as it rids pathogen or dead parasites as some will reside in the liver itself which explains these higher readings that suggest the liver is struggling.Use ivermectin this way too.. a maintenance dose if you live in tropical areas.
So the regime should mimic chemo .. 3 days on 2 days off .. first week ...second week 3 days on 4 days off third week.. 1 day on 6 days off .. this is because parasites have a survival mechanism.. the mother lays eggs that stay in clumps like “cysts” if she starts to die.. she releases a hormone to cause eggs to hatch..so as you kill .. you give the parasite a chance of staying in the body ...so on /off protocol gradually reduces the numbers of each new generation.
I've only seen Fenbendazole as a powder, or paste (Panacur) and not as a capsule.
Wow, you are continually reposting nonsense that has already been refuted both here and on the original substack. You are no different than those that pushed disinformation about ivermectin andHydroxychloroquine. imagine giving credence to someone by reposting who refers to a compounds that have peer reviewed studies showing efficacy as "urban legend" or "street meds".
https://www.scitechnol.com/peer-review-pdfs/fenbendazole-enhancing-antitumor-effect-a-case-series-P3SV.pdf
You may be fooling some but I know exactly why you are doing it and it does not look good on you.
https://fenbendazole.substack.com/archive - so much research on this miracle drug. We are taking it 3 days in a row w/ olive oil twice a year. Check out
Charles Wright substack has provided comments on Huber's article.