health response; "Girls’ brains aged unusually rapidly during the covid... Adolescents’ brains underwent accelerated ageing..., and the effect was more pronounced in girls than in boys"
Thank you for the shout out Dr. Alexander. I appreciate it!
This stinks of gynocide and democide.
It adds to the copious evidence that the response of the pseudoauthorities to "covid" has been not just iatrogenic but especially so for women and girls.
Females of all ages, including young girls, pregnant and breastfeeding women and elderly women have been hit hard.
Although the ovaries may be the organ most affected, not just the female reproductive system is affected l.
Clearly, there is substantial neurological harm occurring.
Women are also experiencing cardiac-related deaths as well as cancers in all organs.
The Pfizer report of April 15. 2022 showed that 68.5 % of people reporting Adverse Effects Following Immunization (AEFIs) were women. 923,194 out of Total Number of Cases: 1,348,079
Overseas, the West Australian government's recently released its 2021 vaccine safety surveillance report found: "The AEFIs disproportionately affected women, with the majority (64%) of reported AEFI cases being female."
What the Pfizer data and the WA government's data demonstrate clearly and unequivocally is that although coerced mass vaccination with these COVID-19 gene injections has harmed both women and men, it has not done so equally.
Approximately 2/3 of those harmed by the COVID-19 gene injection have been women.
Coerced vaccination clearly and unequivocally constitutes discrimination against women. It's indirect discrimination but discrimination nonetheless.
How was this legal?
Where are the women's human rights advocates? Where are the feminarcissists who are quick to fault find and condemn others but make little contribution to the defense of their own so called gender?
Those who mandated the gene injection shots should hang their heads in shame.
Men should be outraged as much as women because females are our fellow human beings and citizens, mothers, daughters, sisters, spouses and friends and they have been disproportionately and unfairly and possibly unlawfully adversely impacted in terms of their health.
This argument ought to be made to every anti-discrimination body in the country and around the world.
Is the US not a party to an international convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women?
Seems to. Had baseline tests. Still able to help elderly family, one has neurological issues and the other has pots from the safe & effective bio weapon.
It’s such a crime against our humanity. But I’m angry about the nano tech everywhere too. Had morgellons/ cross domain bacteria, man , that is hard to go through. That got better after an intense dr supervised detox( clear renu by Metagenics) God bless .
We rightly condemn the disgusting theocracy in Iran, and some of us also condemn the disgusting Saudis, and the disgusting Pakistanis, and other disgusting muslim regimes, as well as the predominantly Hindu but also Sikh Indians, for their mistreatment of women. That is not enough. We must also condemn the greedy Pharma bosses like Bourla and Bancel and Western health bureaucrat bosses like Walensky and others like Hotez who have arguably caused far greater harm to women and girls.
Maybe because girls are wired for relationships, and much of that ability was constrained or shut down, this might account for the differences? So much criminality.
Best to you - Merry Christmas, Paul. May we see many more people wake up in 2024.
I don't think we can hang all of this on lockdown and the mRNA injection.
The most dangerous drug for young girls (and young boys) is the smartphone.
The smartphone existed way before 2020.
The smartphone is a dangerous drug in the hands of young souls.
It leads to young women being unrealistic about their looks and body shape.
It leads to voyeuristic and deliberate embarrassing video campaigns.
Add social media apps and you have a potential thermonuclear bomb of young life destruction.
What I cannot understand, is why no govts have brought in guidance programmes for the youth for smartphone use and why there isn't an age limit for the internet.
I was not allowed to fuck under the age of 16 in South Africa, and even though I bust my cherry at 14, I shat myself because the law said no.
Greetings Barry. I wish you a very Merry Christmas.
I was straight on to smartphones shortly after O2 XDA and i-mate came out in 2002.
They were quite similar to today's smartphones, with about the same size screen as most phones.
So few people used them back then that people looked at me like I was a freak.
I had a friend who was an architect who was another early adopter. He used to chase hurricanes and cyclones.
He would take photos and film of damaged buildings, do sketches on the screen with a stylus, and attach the photos and sketches to damage assessment reports that he dictated and emailed multiple times per day.
They can be very useful for work.
I have friends who will not touch them.
They don't like that they are tracking and surveillance devices.
They don't want Zuck the Cuck or the SECPOL trailing them.
I couldn't care.
I reverted to dumbphones for awhile but not because of the snooping.
They can be very addictive and I agree that they can be harmful to adolescents and their victims.
Women and girls have been systematically suppressed and abused since forever, and gaslit by society that tells us we’re not being deliberately held back, we’re just naturally inferior. Eating disorders, Prozac, self-mutilation and alcohol abuse all silently said differently.
The woman who voiced her dissatisfaction with her place in society was considered a bitch and labeled with a mental disease. She was upsetting “the natural order”. It went all the way back to Adam complaining that Lilith was upsetting the rightful order when she insisted on riding on top every so often. So god have him submissive Eve.
Our current system serves NEITHER girls nor boys very well. It’s designed to advance the well-being of the banksters and transhumanists, and nobody else. But suddenly it’s a problem because the boys are unhappy. Well, boo hoo. Welcome to OUR world until very, very recently. It’s not the great place you kept telling us it was, is it?
Now, can we PLEASE fashion a society in which BOTH boys and girls are stimulated, challenged, and looked upon as bundles of individual potential, and given room to run? A society that adheres neither to corrosive “gender neutral” ideology at the one extreme, nor to restrictive “gender appropriate” ideology at the other. Both are harmful and repressive to each gender. I vote for the middle way in which the individual, not the group, is the focus of concern and both boys and girls are allowed to self-select among all available options in an environment of loving discipline, parental guidance, and a culture of achievement. Now wouldn’t THAT be something!
Thank you for the shout out Dr. Alexander. I appreciate it!
This stinks of gynocide and democide.
It adds to the copious evidence that the response of the pseudoauthorities to "covid" has been not just iatrogenic but especially so for women and girls.
Females of all ages, including young girls, pregnant and breastfeeding women and elderly women have been hit hard.
Although the ovaries may be the organ most affected, not just the female reproductive system is affected l.
Clearly, there is substantial neurological harm occurring.
Women are also experiencing cardiac-related deaths as well as cancers in all organs.
The Pfizer report of April 15. 2022 showed that 68.5 % of people reporting Adverse Effects Following Immunization (AEFIs) were women. 923,194 out of Total Number of Cases: 1,348,079
Overseas, the West Australian government's recently released its 2021 vaccine safety surveillance report found: "The AEFIs disproportionately affected women, with the majority (64%) of reported AEFI cases being female."
What the Pfizer data and the WA government's data demonstrate clearly and unequivocally is that although coerced mass vaccination with these COVID-19 gene injections has harmed both women and men, it has not done so equally.
Approximately 2/3 of those harmed by the COVID-19 gene injection have been women.
Coerced vaccination clearly and unequivocally constitutes discrimination against women. It's indirect discrimination but discrimination nonetheless.
How was this legal?
Where are the women's human rights advocates? Where are the feminarcissists who are quick to fault find and condemn others but make little contribution to the defense of their own so called gender?
Those who mandated the gene injection shots should hang their heads in shame.
Men should be outraged as much as women because females are our fellow human beings and citizens, mothers, daughters, sisters, spouses and friends and they have been disproportionately and unfairly and possibly unlawfully adversely impacted in terms of their health.
This argument ought to be made to every anti-discrimination body in the country and around the world.
Is the US not a party to an international convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women?
I had bleeding in menopause from whatever shedding is. Unjabbed. & it is an outrage!
That's dreadful Rosalind. I am sorry to hear that. I hope things have gotten better for you now.
Seems to. Had baseline tests. Still able to help elderly family, one has neurological issues and the other has pots from the safe & effective bio weapon.
It’s such a crime against our humanity. But I’m angry about the nano tech everywhere too. Had morgellons/ cross domain bacteria, man , that is hard to go through. That got better after an intense dr supervised detox( clear renu by Metagenics) God bless .
A sensitive and scathing commentary on the horrifying facts presented.
Much appreciated.
We rightly condemn the disgusting theocracy in Iran, and some of us also condemn the disgusting Saudis, and the disgusting Pakistanis, and other disgusting muslim regimes, as well as the predominantly Hindu but also Sikh Indians, for their mistreatment of women. That is not enough. We must also condemn the greedy Pharma bosses like Bourla and Bancel and Western health bureaucrat bosses like Walensky and others like Hotez who have arguably caused far greater harm to women and girls.
Interesting and sad. All of it.
Maybe because girls are wired for relationships, and much of that ability was constrained or shut down, this might account for the differences? So much criminality.
Best to you - Merry Christmas, Paul. May we see many more people wake up in 2024.
Greetings ANW,
Compliments of the season.
I don't think we can hang all of this on lockdown and the mRNA injection.
The most dangerous drug for young girls (and young boys) is the smartphone.
The smartphone existed way before 2020.
The smartphone is a dangerous drug in the hands of young souls.
It leads to young women being unrealistic about their looks and body shape.
It leads to voyeuristic and deliberate embarrassing video campaigns.
Add social media apps and you have a potential thermonuclear bomb of young life destruction.
What I cannot understand, is why no govts have brought in guidance programmes for the youth for smartphone use and why there isn't an age limit for the internet.
I was not allowed to fuck under the age of 16 in South Africa, and even though I bust my cherry at 14, I shat myself because the law said no.
Merry Xmas
Barry
Greetings Barry. I wish you a very Merry Christmas.
I was straight on to smartphones shortly after O2 XDA and i-mate came out in 2002.
They were quite similar to today's smartphones, with about the same size screen as most phones.
So few people used them back then that people looked at me like I was a freak.
I had a friend who was an architect who was another early adopter. He used to chase hurricanes and cyclones.
He would take photos and film of damaged buildings, do sketches on the screen with a stylus, and attach the photos and sketches to damage assessment reports that he dictated and emailed multiple times per day.
They can be very useful for work.
I have friends who will not touch them.
They don't like that they are tracking and surveillance devices.
They don't want Zuck the Cuck or the SECPOL trailing them.
I couldn't care.
I reverted to dumbphones for awhile but not because of the snooping.
They can be very addictive and I agree that they can be harmful to adolescents and their victims.
Again, Merry Christmas!
Women and girls have been systematically suppressed and abused since forever, and gaslit by society that tells us we’re not being deliberately held back, we’re just naturally inferior. Eating disorders, Prozac, self-mutilation and alcohol abuse all silently said differently.
The woman who voiced her dissatisfaction with her place in society was considered a bitch and labeled with a mental disease. She was upsetting “the natural order”. It went all the way back to Adam complaining that Lilith was upsetting the rightful order when she insisted on riding on top every so often. So god have him submissive Eve.
Our current system serves NEITHER girls nor boys very well. It’s designed to advance the well-being of the banksters and transhumanists, and nobody else. But suddenly it’s a problem because the boys are unhappy. Well, boo hoo. Welcome to OUR world until very, very recently. It’s not the great place you kept telling us it was, is it?
Now, can we PLEASE fashion a society in which BOTH boys and girls are stimulated, challenged, and looked upon as bundles of individual potential, and given room to run? A society that adheres neither to corrosive “gender neutral” ideology at the one extreme, nor to restrictive “gender appropriate” ideology at the other. Both are harmful and repressive to each gender. I vote for the middle way in which the individual, not the group, is the focus of concern and both boys and girls are allowed to self-select among all available options in an environment of loving discipline, parental guidance, and a culture of achievement. Now wouldn’t THAT be something!