When you invite the enemy into your home, this is what you get...two people who are against the citizens of America and for cheap foreign workers. THAT IS NOT MAGA.
When you invite the enemy into your home, this is what you get...two people who are against the citizens of America and for cheap foreign workers. THAT IS NOT MAGA.
I have argued before Republicans and Democrats wanted the borders breached....it aint only Democrats...the border is so because Republicans want it so...too....money money money
No one ever said immigrants are enemies. If they come into the country the proper way, they are welcomed. The open borders of Biden/Harris and the law breakers coming across those borders are NOT welcomed. You do realize that Chinese military aged men, Islamist terrorists, criminals and gangs are coming across our border, don't you?
You equated Musk and the other guy with "when you invite the enemy into your home, this is what you get". At least Musk got here via H-1B and then it seems went the greencard route (then naturalization). H-1B falls technically it seems under the category of "Temporary (Nonimmigrant) Workers" (so my direct equation of being against H-1B means being against immigration is false, but I guess many H-1B workers go then the immigration route and then become Americans, so if you would stop H-1B you would also stop to some extent the immigration process, it seems the H-1B also falls under the "dual intent" doctrine. Generally the argument is that these foreign skilled workers shouldnt take the local American jobs away, but if you have this argument than you surely be also against "Permanent Immigrant Worker" visa or other categories https://www.uscis.gov/working-in-the-united-states, because they ALSO, and even in higher numbers take American jobs away. If not, why are temporary nonimmigrant visas bad, and why are immigrant visas good? What about temporay visits for Business? What about investors? See, it becomes complex fast. During this whole discussion it seems to me that many ultra MAGA figures are against all immigration and against all foreigners, so as to have a figuratively (not real) CLEAN "American Race" or Nation where you shut down all borders and airport entries. So bascially 100% isolatism.
Musk and others came here the proper way, in Musks case via H-1B.
I dont agree with Elon and Ramaswamy, they should have respect and be more humble, but its important to not kill the US economy, which would be very bad because it could lead to another plandemic creation so as to print more money. Also many citizens who are against foreigners taking US jobs away are ALSO against China and FOR some kind of trade-war or technological armsrace war, this is exactly what the argument from Elon is, that you cant compete against China or the world if you dont have the smartest people and H-1B should facilitate that.
Regarding Viveks stance it seems he was 1 year ago ALSO against or for an improvement version of the H-1B
So you're saying Americans aren't the smartest people when many of the H-1B are educated here because foreign and often enemy countries fund the universities. Why not hire our people first, then go to H-1B. Ignoring our people and first going to foreigners is not MAGA. After two years, these foreigners are often offered green cards, the road to citizenship, then once they get citizenship, they bring their families into America. That's chain migration again. It's another racket of immigration that needs to be completely stopped. America first! That's what we voted for.
As for Vivek, he is not at all trustworthy.
Ramaswamy is a first cousin to Usha Vance.
The Paul & Daisy Soros Fellowship was awarded in 2011 to Ramaswamy to pursue a JD in Law at Yale University, same alma mater as JD and Usha Vance.
On page 41 of "Superclass” by David Rothkopf he writes, "Wu Xiaoling governs the foreign reserves of the People’s Bank of China, which amount to more than $1.4 trillion. The bank controls more financial assets than any other single public financial institution in the history of the world, with the total expected to pass $2 trillion by 2010. It has already extended its reach overseas with a $3 billion investment in the New York-based Blackstone Group from a bank controlled by the CCP. Wu also ranked eighteenth on Forbes’s list of the world’s most powerful women in 2007 — probably an understatement of her global influence."
Blackstone was the forerunner to BlackRock, where Larry Fink shared managerial duties with his partner Stephen Schwarzman. They had a falling-out and Fink created Blackrock. It would be Blackrock that later synthetically boosted Vivek's company Roivant Sciences by buying their stock and inflating its value.
Fink is also on the steering committee of the World Economic Forum. They named Vivek as a young global leader. Once this was discovered, he disavowed it and claimed that they used his name without his knowledge. (Very unlikely.) Vivek has been "managed" by the Davos crowd since he was a kid, groomed for power. You can see both he and Pete Buttigieg masquerading as "average college kids asking questions" on Chris Matthews' show "Hardball" when Vivek was 19.
To a great extent, yes. But let's distinguish between the ones who came here legally and those who didn't. I speak of the criminals:
We could ask the 29 year old female who was burned alive in the NYC subway but alas, she can no longer reply.
We could ask the teachers who have classrooms full of kids who speak no English, and the administrators struggling to find resources to accommodate these children.
We could ask the emergency room staff at any and every hospital in America about the ridiculous amount of visits for snotty noses and insignificant aches and pains that could better be treated at a walk in clinic but well, clinics charge money.
We could ask the residents in many states who are now fearful to leave their apartments and houses for fear of encountering Tres what-ever gang and the danger they represent.
We could ask the parents of Laken Riley how they feel about those illegal immigrants who have no business being here.
The open sewer that is not only Mexico but many other South American countries is being brought here and is having a dramatic negative impact on our culture and our cities.
Deport every single one of them who came here illegally. If they don't want to take their American born children with them, they place them with adoption agencies. Enough is enough.
That is the number one problem. I have been sending information via my articles to Stephen Miller. He is the number one best. Homan and Zeldin are great. So is Russ Vought for OMG, RFK Jr. for HHS, Weldon, Makary and Bhattacharya for CDC, FDA and NIH are all excellent. The rest have grave problems, including Susie Wiles.
I'd say the worst choices are Gabbard, Noem, Rubio, Waltz, Elise Stefanik and Lutnick, the latter two being members of the World Economic Forum, but all trouble. Gabbard is very dangerous and people are oblivious to her real beliefs.
I've written 3 articles on his choices, I need to do more. I hope that he'll listen to Stephen Miller. One good thing is he doesn't have a problem saying, YOU'RE FIRED.
I'm in awe of your ability to zero in on the problem of dual-citizen parties who's loyalties may lay other where's than the USA...
when it comes to citizens of Turkiye...
and overlook the similar dynamics and potential 'pitfalls' of having dualies from certain 'beacons of democracy' occupies positions in the same administration... regardless of similar conflicts of interest... in regards to where they spent their military service... own properties etc.,
oh, and the quote from Erdogan - would you like to have a look at the quotes from Netayahoo caught on video candidly describing his feelings on the USA?
Different strokes for different "Folks" huh?
Oh btw.... Oz upset the medical establishment with his 'alternative cures' stuff?
My My... you sure you're in the right place here? Better bolster with a booster bro!
so many run-on sentences that make understanding what you're writing very difficult. Obviously you dislike the State of Israel and are using it as an example.
delving deeper than mere grammatical quibble, it may be better said that I dislike hypocrites of all descriptions, but most certainly those who crap on their own intended argument by using double standards in the expectations that most of us are too stupid to notice.
I like Tulsi. Though I know she's pretty much no war ever. I do know her past. But since then she got the democratic party treatment. And knows very well where abuse is in the 3 letter intelligence agencies.
If she backslides. I would want him to fire. But I'm thinking this position might be just down her new ally. Once persecuted. Here's hoping she generalises well.
Re other appointees: if really don't like surgeon general. And I'm very much anti WEF ( though hoping people are waking. Much evil was hidden tell last year or 2). CMS Oz is a concern. AI Tech SACHS is a concern to me. Basically calling MAGA foot soldiers retards.
Part of problem is I'm not sure how tuned into WEF and DEI and Tech as Trumo should be. Big red flags. But I didn't get clued in myself until 18 months ago. And he's been focusing internally. Not big picture. Who has his ear? That's what's critical. He is open to learning new stuff. But if he's in a bubble ??
here is a list of Gabbards pros and cons. However, there's far more regarding her and her family and their ties, which haven't been written about yet.
Tulsi Gabbard is Trump’s choice for Director of National Intelligence. This is where Benz and Waller belong.
1) She co-sponsored a bill in support of a two-state solution.
2) When Obama refused to veto a U.N. Security Council resolution condemning Israeli settlement policies, Gabbard opposed a measure to criticize him citing “the harmful impact Israeli settlement activity has on prospects for peace.”
3) Gabbard voted in favor of the JCPOA – the agreement that allowed Iran to develop nuclear weapons. She later criticized President Trump for withdrawing from the JCPOA saying he was “setting the stage for a war with Iran.”
4) When the Assad regime launched rockets carrying the deadly nerve agent sarin into Damascus killing more than 1,400 people, Gabbard voted against the condemnation of Syria for war crimes and crimes against humanity and against military action. She also criticized Trump for firing cruise missiles on Syria.
5) Gabbard was a co-sponsor of Rep. Ilan Omar’s bill in support of the right to boycott Israel and refused to censure Omar’ antisemitic statements.
More on Gabbard’s disturbing views here.
6) Gabbard criticized President Donald Trump’s confrontational stance toward Beijing and warned about the downsides of escalating tensions with China. She says a cooperative relationship is needed instead to confront global challenges.
7) Gabbard highlights her record as a lifelong environmentalist and campaigner for action on climate change, including proposals for sweeping legislation on clean energy. She has spoken in favor of many aspects of the Green New Deal framework.
8) Gabbard is a skeptic of multinational trade deals, which she argues have led to large U.S. job losses, lower wages, and a loss of U.S. sovereignty. She also opposes Trump’s trade war with China.
9) Gabbard’s campaign has been centered on the need to avoid “regime change wars” in the Middle East, while also advocating further steps to fight Islamist radicalism.
10) Gabbard is broadly noninterventionist, arguing that the United States should not use its military power to reshape other countries’ political systems, but rather should use diplomacy to find common ground and avoid war even with the most intransigent adversaries.
I knew of her leaning back when. My hope is she has been awakened to the evils since she was turned on. Though in her role as dni. I do not believe she will be making foreign policy.
Trump is pro israel. And try and make peace. But not peace at all costs. So I don't think he will abandon his beliefs. He will fire if there is too much problems. I believe.
You are so right, KN. Trump's choices are bizarro and aligned with neocons and fellow Zionists. What Chuckie Schumer doesn't destroy, Trump will finish the job. Where we lose is when both presidential candidates are miserable choices. Having voted for Orange Man, I am now attacking his choices. Get ready to send your boys overseas so the Zios can extend their empire.......at our cost.
It's Israel at the present time that is the country that Americans are expected to be happy to send their sons and daughters to die for, Michael. But Israel is not the only country for which Americans have been expected to serve as cannon fodder to keep foreigners from having to do so and out of harm's way. Recall from years ago: "A high Gulf official quoted in the Wall Street Journal sees no reason for his son to 'die for Kuwait.' 'We have our white slaves from America to do that,' he explains with a 'chuckle.” Americans are seen as expendable and of little value. As with dying for Kuwait previously, if they die for Israel going forward, there'll be more to take their place
That's BS. Israel does NOT want our people on the ground over there. They only appreciated the financial support to keep their weaponry supply to fill their need to defend themselves. You need to stop spreading lies.
When you invite the enemy into your home, this is what you get...two people who are against the citizens of America and for cheap foreign workers. THAT IS NOT MAGA.
I have argued before Republicans and Democrats wanted the borders breached....it aint only Democrats...the border is so because Republicans want it so...too....money money money
ABSOLUTELY TRUE DOC!
So immigrants are now enemies?
No one ever said immigrants are enemies. If they come into the country the proper way, they are welcomed. The open borders of Biden/Harris and the law breakers coming across those borders are NOT welcomed. You do realize that Chinese military aged men, Islamist terrorists, criminals and gangs are coming across our border, don't you?
You equated Musk and the other guy with "when you invite the enemy into your home, this is what you get". At least Musk got here via H-1B and then it seems went the greencard route (then naturalization). H-1B falls technically it seems under the category of "Temporary (Nonimmigrant) Workers" (so my direct equation of being against H-1B means being against immigration is false, but I guess many H-1B workers go then the immigration route and then become Americans, so if you would stop H-1B you would also stop to some extent the immigration process, it seems the H-1B also falls under the "dual intent" doctrine. Generally the argument is that these foreign skilled workers shouldnt take the local American jobs away, but if you have this argument than you surely be also against "Permanent Immigrant Worker" visa or other categories https://www.uscis.gov/working-in-the-united-states, because they ALSO, and even in higher numbers take American jobs away. If not, why are temporary nonimmigrant visas bad, and why are immigrant visas good? What about temporay visits for Business? What about investors? See, it becomes complex fast. During this whole discussion it seems to me that many ultra MAGA figures are against all immigration and against all foreigners, so as to have a figuratively (not real) CLEAN "American Race" or Nation where you shut down all borders and airport entries. So bascially 100% isolatism.
Musk and others came here the proper way, in Musks case via H-1B.
I dont agree with Elon and Ramaswamy, they should have respect and be more humble, but its important to not kill the US economy, which would be very bad because it could lead to another plandemic creation so as to print more money. Also many citizens who are against foreigners taking US jobs away are ALSO against China and FOR some kind of trade-war or technological armsrace war, this is exactly what the argument from Elon is, that you cant compete against China or the world if you dont have the smartest people and H-1B should facilitate that.
Regarding Viveks stance it seems he was 1 year ago ALSO against or for an improvement version of the H-1B
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/16/ramaswamy-h1b-visa-gop-visa-00116383
Sidenote: The US still requires the mRNA shots as requirement for immigrant workers....
So you're saying Americans aren't the smartest people when many of the H-1B are educated here because foreign and often enemy countries fund the universities. Why not hire our people first, then go to H-1B. Ignoring our people and first going to foreigners is not MAGA. After two years, these foreigners are often offered green cards, the road to citizenship, then once they get citizenship, they bring their families into America. That's chain migration again. It's another racket of immigration that needs to be completely stopped. America first! That's what we voted for.
As for Vivek, he is not at all trustworthy.
Ramaswamy is a first cousin to Usha Vance.
The Paul & Daisy Soros Fellowship was awarded in 2011 to Ramaswamy to pursue a JD in Law at Yale University, same alma mater as JD and Usha Vance.
On page 41 of "Superclass” by David Rothkopf he writes, "Wu Xiaoling governs the foreign reserves of the People’s Bank of China, which amount to more than $1.4 trillion. The bank controls more financial assets than any other single public financial institution in the history of the world, with the total expected to pass $2 trillion by 2010. It has already extended its reach overseas with a $3 billion investment in the New York-based Blackstone Group from a bank controlled by the CCP. Wu also ranked eighteenth on Forbes’s list of the world’s most powerful women in 2007 — probably an understatement of her global influence."
Blackstone was the forerunner to BlackRock, where Larry Fink shared managerial duties with his partner Stephen Schwarzman. They had a falling-out and Fink created Blackrock. It would be Blackrock that later synthetically boosted Vivek's company Roivant Sciences by buying their stock and inflating its value.
Fink is also on the steering committee of the World Economic Forum. They named Vivek as a young global leader. Once this was discovered, he disavowed it and claimed that they used his name without his knowledge. (Very unlikely.) Vivek has been "managed" by the Davos crowd since he was a kid, groomed for power. You can see both he and Pete Buttigieg masquerading as "average college kids asking questions" on Chris Matthews' show "Hardball" when Vivek was 19.
"So immigrants are now enemies?"
To a great extent, yes. But let's distinguish between the ones who came here legally and those who didn't. I speak of the criminals:
We could ask the 29 year old female who was burned alive in the NYC subway but alas, she can no longer reply.
We could ask the teachers who have classrooms full of kids who speak no English, and the administrators struggling to find resources to accommodate these children.
We could ask the emergency room staff at any and every hospital in America about the ridiculous amount of visits for snotty noses and insignificant aches and pains that could better be treated at a walk in clinic but well, clinics charge money.
We could ask the residents in many states who are now fearful to leave their apartments and houses for fear of encountering Tres what-ever gang and the danger they represent.
We could ask the parents of Laken Riley how they feel about those illegal immigrants who have no business being here.
The open sewer that is not only Mexico but many other South American countries is being brought here and is having a dramatic negative impact on our culture and our cities.
Deport every single one of them who came here illegally. If they don't want to take their American born children with them, they place them with adoption agencies. Enough is enough.
How do we get Trump to see this ?
That is the number one problem. I have been sending information via my articles to Stephen Miller. He is the number one best. Homan and Zeldin are great. So is Russ Vought for OMG, RFK Jr. for HHS, Weldon, Makary and Bhattacharya for CDC, FDA and NIH are all excellent. The rest have grave problems, including Susie Wiles.
I'd say the worst choices are Gabbard, Noem, Rubio, Waltz, Elise Stefanik and Lutnick, the latter two being members of the World Economic Forum, but all trouble. Gabbard is very dangerous and people are oblivious to her real beliefs.
Add Dr. Mehmet Oz as dangerous, he's a citizen of Turkey and the USA and friends with Erdogan. https://www.ruthfullyyours.com/2024/12/11/is-americas-doctor-a-good-choice-to-head-the-centers-for-medicare-and-medicaid-by-janet-levy/
I've written 3 articles on his choices, I need to do more. I hope that he'll listen to Stephen Miller. One good thing is he doesn't have a problem saying, YOU'RE FIRED.
I'm in awe of your ability to zero in on the problem of dual-citizen parties who's loyalties may lay other where's than the USA...
when it comes to citizens of Turkiye...
and overlook the similar dynamics and potential 'pitfalls' of having dualies from certain 'beacons of democracy' occupies positions in the same administration... regardless of similar conflicts of interest... in regards to where they spent their military service... own properties etc.,
oh, and the quote from Erdogan - would you like to have a look at the quotes from Netayahoo caught on video candidly describing his feelings on the USA?
Different strokes for different "Folks" huh?
Oh btw.... Oz upset the medical establishment with his 'alternative cures' stuff?
My My... you sure you're in the right place here? Better bolster with a booster bro!
so many run-on sentences that make understanding what you're writing very difficult. Obviously you dislike the State of Israel and are using it as an example.
delving deeper than mere grammatical quibble, it may be better said that I dislike hypocrites of all descriptions, but most certainly those who crap on their own intended argument by using double standards in the expectations that most of us are too stupid to notice.
Obviously.
I like Tulsi. Though I know she's pretty much no war ever. I do know her past. But since then she got the democratic party treatment. And knows very well where abuse is in the 3 letter intelligence agencies.
If she backslides. I would want him to fire. But I'm thinking this position might be just down her new ally. Once persecuted. Here's hoping she generalises well.
Re other appointees: if really don't like surgeon general. And I'm very much anti WEF ( though hoping people are waking. Much evil was hidden tell last year or 2). CMS Oz is a concern. AI Tech SACHS is a concern to me. Basically calling MAGA foot soldiers retards.
Part of problem is I'm not sure how tuned into WEF and DEI and Tech as Trumo should be. Big red flags. But I didn't get clued in myself until 18 months ago. And he's been focusing internally. Not big picture. Who has his ear? That's what's critical. He is open to learning new stuff. But if he's in a bubble ??
here is a list of Gabbards pros and cons. However, there's far more regarding her and her family and their ties, which haven't been written about yet.
Tulsi Gabbard is Trump’s choice for Director of National Intelligence. This is where Benz and Waller belong.
1) She co-sponsored a bill in support of a two-state solution.
2) When Obama refused to veto a U.N. Security Council resolution condemning Israeli settlement policies, Gabbard opposed a measure to criticize him citing “the harmful impact Israeli settlement activity has on prospects for peace.”
3) Gabbard voted in favor of the JCPOA – the agreement that allowed Iran to develop nuclear weapons. She later criticized President Trump for withdrawing from the JCPOA saying he was “setting the stage for a war with Iran.”
4) When the Assad regime launched rockets carrying the deadly nerve agent sarin into Damascus killing more than 1,400 people, Gabbard voted against the condemnation of Syria for war crimes and crimes against humanity and against military action. She also criticized Trump for firing cruise missiles on Syria.
5) Gabbard was a co-sponsor of Rep. Ilan Omar’s bill in support of the right to boycott Israel and refused to censure Omar’ antisemitic statements.
More on Gabbard’s disturbing views here.
6) Gabbard criticized President Donald Trump’s confrontational stance toward Beijing and warned about the downsides of escalating tensions with China. She says a cooperative relationship is needed instead to confront global challenges.
7) Gabbard highlights her record as a lifelong environmentalist and campaigner for action on climate change, including proposals for sweeping legislation on clean energy. She has spoken in favor of many aspects of the Green New Deal framework.
8) Gabbard is a skeptic of multinational trade deals, which she argues have led to large U.S. job losses, lower wages, and a loss of U.S. sovereignty. She also opposes Trump’s trade war with China.
9) Gabbard’s campaign has been centered on the need to avoid “regime change wars” in the Middle East, while also advocating further steps to fight Islamist radicalism.
10) Gabbard is broadly noninterventionist, arguing that the United States should not use its military power to reshape other countries’ political systems, but rather should use diplomacy to find common ground and avoid war even with the most intransigent adversaries.
I knew of her leaning back when. My hope is she has been awakened to the evils since she was turned on. Though in her role as dni. I do not believe she will be making foreign policy.
Trump is pro israel. And try and make peace. But not peace at all costs. So I don't think he will abandon his beliefs. He will fire if there is too much problems. I believe.
I share your opinions. I have been puzzled of the open arms to Gabbard.
Forget Gabbard, let's talk about "beautiful vaccines".
You are so right, KN. Trump's choices are bizarro and aligned with neocons and fellow Zionists. What Chuckie Schumer doesn't destroy, Trump will finish the job. Where we lose is when both presidential candidates are miserable choices. Having voted for Orange Man, I am now attacking his choices. Get ready to send your boys overseas so the Zios can extend their empire.......at our cost.
It's Israel at the present time that is the country that Americans are expected to be happy to send their sons and daughters to die for, Michael. But Israel is not the only country for which Americans have been expected to serve as cannon fodder to keep foreigners from having to do so and out of harm's way. Recall from years ago: "A high Gulf official quoted in the Wall Street Journal sees no reason for his son to 'die for Kuwait.' 'We have our white slaves from America to do that,' he explains with a 'chuckle.” Americans are seen as expendable and of little value. As with dying for Kuwait previously, if they die for Israel going forward, there'll be more to take their place
That's BS. Israel does NOT want our people on the ground over there. They only appreciated the financial support to keep their weaponry supply to fill their need to defend themselves. You need to stop spreading lies.
"Oh, yes. Those beautiful vaccines have helped so many Americans. I can't mention enough good things to say about them".