Bardosh et al.: "COVID-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: a risk benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities"; Booster mandates in young adults are expected to cause
Bardosh et al.: "COVID-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: a risk benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities"; Booster mandates in young adults are expected to cause
a net harm: per COVID-19 hospitalisation prevented, we anticipate at least 18.5 serious adverse events from mRNA vaccines, including 1.5–4.6 booster-associated myopericarditis cases in males
One of the many reasons why the mandates are unethical is because, as indictated by the Cleveland Clinic data, mRNA vaccinated people are major vectors of transmission who are more likely to become infected with the virus and therefore are more likely to infect others! Selfishly imposing or following mandates without researching the empirical outcomes puts the community at risk. Professor Christian Perronne warned two years ago that the vaccinated need to be rounded up and held in quarantine camps.
Well, it’s a start. But sooooo many blind spots. “Ethical?” These still hubris- marinated, lettered fcks argue “ethics?” How about bringing in Constitutional Scholars first? What about the damage caused by mass “vaccine” induced viral mutations?
Everyone reading this ‘stack is well aware of the huge “gaps” in ethical compensation for the “vax”-injured here, but there’s no mention in this piece of the ethical gaps in PUNISHMENT of the instigators, the censors, the whole system that created this Spike and the pandemic itself.
This BMJ piece is coming from within the bubble of the true believers.... they believe their precious “Science” and are trying to provide a way out for their fellow true believers.
Okay. Call it a start if you want. I call it a distraction.
Is this actually 18-19 students out of the whole cohort -30K that would have serious adverse events? Why wouldn’t that be higher? Not that I want that, just trying to understand what is meant here.
Thank you for sharing this, I just forwarded it to Fordham University (a Jesuit Uni with NO ethics or morals at the moment).
One of the many reasons why the mandates are unethical is because, as indictated by the Cleveland Clinic data, mRNA vaccinated people are major vectors of transmission who are more likely to become infected with the virus and therefore are more likely to infect others! Selfishly imposing or following mandates without researching the empirical outcomes puts the community at risk. Professor Christian Perronne warned two years ago that the vaccinated need to be rounded up and held in quarantine camps.
I hope all students, whether expelled, separated voluntarily, or injured due to the mandates, will sue for the harm done to them or to be expected.
Well, it’s a start. But sooooo many blind spots. “Ethical?” These still hubris- marinated, lettered fcks argue “ethics?” How about bringing in Constitutional Scholars first? What about the damage caused by mass “vaccine” induced viral mutations?
Everyone reading this ‘stack is well aware of the huge “gaps” in ethical compensation for the “vax”-injured here, but there’s no mention in this piece of the ethical gaps in PUNISHMENT of the instigators, the censors, the whole system that created this Spike and the pandemic itself.
This BMJ piece is coming from within the bubble of the true believers.... they believe their precious “Science” and are trying to provide a way out for their fellow true believers.
Okay. Call it a start if you want. I call it a distraction.
Is this actually 18-19 students out of the whole cohort -30K that would have serious adverse events? Why wouldn’t that be higher? Not that I want that, just trying to understand what is meant here.
👀