not care if the agents are placed in harms way! You go Kristi! The call is coming from inside the house! Again the deepstate are trying to subvert Big Daddy Trump aka the Orange Prophet
She can definitely refer them to the DOJ now run by fair honest people - for prosecution for endangering officers & others & violating federal immigration law. Definitely she can & will.
I had one given to me by the FBI when my mother was murdered. I told the truth. Polygraph said I lied. FBI wanted it to be me so badly. However, I had an alibi. I was in another town that fateful night.
And to this day the murder was never solved. I know who did it. Her boyfriend. She was found stabbed 37 times and thrown in a ditch. The FBI and local homicide told me to never call them again unless I had new information.
Sadly, these FBI people’s determined that I probably had an accomplice. Since then, this same man has lost two wives under suspicious circumstances. There kids found me after each death hoping to get information and open a cold case for my mother. They run into the same problem as I did. They were told to drop it.
Consider it could be the operator, manipulating to extract a confession? Much more likely a boyfriend murdering a girl friend than the girl friends daughter. Also different people probably react differently with the test.
The accuracy (i.e., validity) of polygraph testing has long been controversial. An underlying problem is theoretical: There is no evidence that any pattern of physiological reactions is unique to deception. An honest person may be nervous when answering truthfully and a dishonest person may be non-anxious. Also, there are few good studies that validate the ability of polygraph procedures to detect deception. As Dr. Saxe and Israeli psychologist Gershon Ben-Shahar (1999) note, "it may, in fact, be impossible to conduct a proper validity study." In real-world situations, it's very difficult to know what the truth is.
A particular problem is that polygraph research has not separated placebo-like effects (the subject's belief in the efficacy of the procedure) from the actual relationship between deception and their physiological responses. One reason that polygraph tests may appear to be accurate is that subjects who believe that the test works and that they can be detected may confess or will be very anxious when questioned. If this view is correct, the lie detector might be better called a fear detector.
Some confusion about polygraph test accuracy arises because they are used for different purposes, and for each context somewhat different theory and research is applicable. Thus, for example, virtually no research assesses the type of test and procedure used to screen individuals for jobs and security clearances. Most research has focused on specific incident testing. The cumulative research evidence suggests that CQTs detect deception better than chance, but with significant error rates, both of misclassifying innocent subjects (false positives) and failing to detect guilty individuals (false negatives).
Like many comments, below, I won't believe it until I see it; namely, real action to root out the leakers of any info, which surely is, at a minimum, Law Enforcement Sensitive (LES) (similar to FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY). Such information is not classified information, but it is protected information nonetheless.
Also, administering polygraph examinations are easier said than done. The government (the armed services, at least) is woefully short of qualified polygraphers.
Hopefully Noem's internal investigation will boil down the list of suspects to just a few persons, and they could commence the poly examinations from there.
Then maybe use the tactic, the lawyer uses in Legally Blonde, on the pool guy. After he asks how long he’d been sleeping with defendant, who then smugly lies, “3 months”. Lawyer quickly asks, “and the name of your boyfriend?” Pool boy, “Chuck”. Lawyer, “No more questions your honor”. Pool guy tries to clean up, saying Chuck’s just a friend, and Chuck arises from the middle of courtroom, angry & hurt, spewing, “you beotch!” Stomps out.
When the arrests of the traitors begin.. all of them.. I will be impressed.
Until then its all talk.
could not agree more...
Agreed. Until then I'll assume they're controlled opposition.
yes
💯💯💯
Prepare yourself to NOT be impressed, methinks.
hhmm
Please, let me dream alittle longer...
ha ha
🤞
Problem is the "level of impressedness"...
If only the low hanging fruit are arrested then its no different than no-one being arrested.
You don't stop the drug trade by arresting only the dealers.... you go after the head(s) of the drug trade.
I have no expectations; therefore, I cannot be disappointed!
AOC, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Talib
Go get ‘em Kristi! ICE Raid Leakers should lose their jobs, and be prosecuted and sent to prison!
if she could, of course yes send to prison
She can definitely refer them to the DOJ now run by fair honest people - for prosecution for endangering officers & others & violating federal immigration law. Definitely she can & will.
A person gave a warning of an ICE Raid in Los Angeles on the Nextdoor app. Get them, Kristi!!!
Wow deport or jail that traitorous person. Or how bout we give this person to Putin. Then one of America's Heros can be released.
RIP T HE BASTARDS APART
Good! 💪. I hope they catch the bishes that leaked the info. They need to get canned or worse.
Can’t trust polygraph test. I know this as a fact. But, good ploy to weed out the chaff.
I took a polygraph test one time, I was surprised at how accurate it was.
I had one given to me by the FBI when my mother was murdered. I told the truth. Polygraph said I lied. FBI wanted it to be me so badly. However, I had an alibi. I was in another town that fateful night.
And to this day the murder was never solved. I know who did it. Her boyfriend. She was found stabbed 37 times and thrown in a ditch. The FBI and local homicide told me to never call them again unless I had new information.
Sadly, these FBI people’s determined that I probably had an accomplice. Since then, this same man has lost two wives under suspicious circumstances. There kids found me after each death hoping to get information and open a cold case for my mother. They run into the same problem as I did. They were told to drop it.
Polygraph test are not accurate.
Consider it could be the operator, manipulating to extract a confession? Much more likely a boyfriend murdering a girl friend than the girl friends daughter. Also different people probably react differently with the test.
I don’t know… They said I lied about everything. It’s the reason I don’t believe in polygraph test.
BOOM all dumbshits. https://www.apa.org/topics/cognitive-neuroscience/polygraph
The accuracy (i.e., validity) of polygraph testing has long been controversial. An underlying problem is theoretical: There is no evidence that any pattern of physiological reactions is unique to deception. An honest person may be nervous when answering truthfully and a dishonest person may be non-anxious. Also, there are few good studies that validate the ability of polygraph procedures to detect deception. As Dr. Saxe and Israeli psychologist Gershon Ben-Shahar (1999) note, "it may, in fact, be impossible to conduct a proper validity study." In real-world situations, it's very difficult to know what the truth is.
A particular problem is that polygraph research has not separated placebo-like effects (the subject's belief in the efficacy of the procedure) from the actual relationship between deception and their physiological responses. One reason that polygraph tests may appear to be accurate is that subjects who believe that the test works and that they can be detected may confess or will be very anxious when questioned. If this view is correct, the lie detector might be better called a fear detector.
Some confusion about polygraph test accuracy arises because they are used for different purposes, and for each context somewhat different theory and research is applicable. Thus, for example, virtually no research assesses the type of test and procedure used to screen individuals for jobs and security clearances. Most research has focused on specific incident testing. The cumulative research evidence suggests that CQTs detect deception better than chance, but with significant error rates, both of misclassifying innocent subjects (false positives) and failing to detect guilty individuals (false negatives).
Hopefully they do not know this🤣.
Something for everyone, a comedy tonight
It is highly likely that fear is the motivational result of these threats of polygraphs. A great deterrent and motivator of human behavior.
Lgggg Kristi Noem step right up for your polygraph 💯👊🏼🇺🇸🫡
Go Kristi!
Like many comments, below, I won't believe it until I see it; namely, real action to root out the leakers of any info, which surely is, at a minimum, Law Enforcement Sensitive (LES) (similar to FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY). Such information is not classified information, but it is protected information nonetheless.
Also, administering polygraph examinations are easier said than done. The government (the armed services, at least) is woefully short of qualified polygraphers.
Hopefully Noem's internal investigation will boil down the list of suspects to just a few persons, and they could commence the poly examinations from there.
110%
Then maybe use the tactic, the lawyer uses in Legally Blonde, on the pool guy. After he asks how long he’d been sleeping with defendant, who then smugly lies, “3 months”. Lawyer quickly asks, “and the name of your boyfriend?” Pool boy, “Chuck”. Lawyer, “No more questions your honor”. Pool guy tries to clean up, saying Chuck’s just a friend, and Chuck arises from the middle of courtroom, angry & hurt, spewing, “you beotch!” Stomps out.
Busted!