Bourla: Pfizer CEO admits he is 'not certain' their COVID-19 shot will prevent vaccinated people from spreading the virus; “I think this is something that needs to be examined. We are not certain"
Bourla: Pfizer CEO admits he is 'not certain' their COVID-19 shot will prevent vaccinated people from spreading the virus; “I think this is something that needs to be examined. We are not certain"
It slipped by you, this key statement in 2020 by Bourla of Pfizer: when asked by NBC host if he will be able to transmit infection to other people if he is immunized, he said “it needs to be examined"
Lol, for all you normies, welcome to domestic enemy media lies 101.
Exhibit 1-
1). Guy with actual legal liability makes vague statement, that’s ambiguous and can be taken either way.
“Yeah, so our vaccine needs to be checked if it stops transmission, I mean, that’s how vaccines always work…and we made a vaccine, so…. But yeah, we need to check it.”
2). Politician who can’t be fired, has no liability, and who has the protection of the enemy combatant media spins the vague statement. “Well when you’re vaccinated you stop the spread of disease.”
3). Subversive, subhuman media tosses the line in the water. “Well there you have it folks, if you get vaccinated against COVID, you won’t spread it.”
4). Every single other media organization cites the original Tokyo Rose media statement, and runs their versions of the same story.
5). Treasonous comedians and late night hosts cement the narrative into the lexicon.
I’ve watched them do some iteration of this over and over and over again.
Sarah Palins quote “I can see Russia from my house” (SNL line originally, that the politicians picked up and used, then the media reported it, then the late night talk show ran with it.)
Rolling Stones “article” about people overdosing on ivermectin.
Trumps “Mexicans are rapists” when he was talking about MS13.
Trumps “neo Nazis are good people” when he specifically called out the neo Nazis as bad.
And assault rifles are “machine guns”.
A few examples amongst many, but this is how the game is played.
Indeed. The transfection weren't tested for transmission during trials. Then in the real world during Delta it became obvious. Then during omicron, blatantly obvious. I suspect that it wasn't stopping transmission pre-delta but the virus wasn't quite as infectious then anyway.
The cited quote occurred before the shot rollout. The reality is none of the vaxxes, even prior to this set, have stopped infection or transmission. They never can. Think about it.
If Mike receives a COVID shot or whatever, he's now infected. His body will try whatever means it can to eliminate the contents inserted. One method is through shedding via respiration, perspiration, defecation, etc. If jabbed or unjabbed Tom is exposed to those contaminated secretions, he also will become infected. Tom's body will do the same thing as Mike's. Whether or not either of them becomes symptomatic is not relevant. Their bodies must get rid of this unwanted stuff.
Humans have been creating and spreading diseases to sicken and kill our own species since before Christ was born. In ca. 6th century, some in the targeted groups began experimenting with inoculations for the very nasty ones. By the time the first vax (smallpox) was deployed in the US in the early 1800s, those who studied history already knew this ritual wouldn't stop infection or transmission.
Yes. This frog-necked eugenics freak has been all over with his announcements.
"Excited to share that updated analysis from our Phase 3 study with BioNTech also showed that our COVID-19 vaccine was 100% effective in preventing #COVID19 cases in South Africa. 100%!
Same from the the press release: "Vaccine was 100% effective in preventing COVID-19 cases in South Africa, where the B.1.351 lineage is prevalent" (=Beta variant.)
The experimental gene therapy has never prevented infection, just reduced symptoms during a short time window but the price is awful risk and negative efficacy later. Regarding to negative efficacy (and possible ADE), the vaccine antibody-escaping variants are already raging at >10%!, see info from CDC insider: https://twitter.com/DrEricDing/status/1580749470580453376?s=20&t=o3uezaStAKdMRF_OGVZE0A
You should read the article about the couple who invented the vaccine on a computer in an afternoon, without any virus or evidence of a virus being present when they did that. They were so busy in their lab, they only took time off to be married, before going back into their lab and carrying on where they left off. Probably being married meant that they shared the same table for their experiments, instead of separate ones - ain't love sweet. Apparently they are together worth Billions, yet the male of the pair still rides his bike to work and home again - bet neither of them have had their vaccines - my guess is that they would try them out on lab animals first, to see how effective their vaccines are - hang on a moment, that is all of you vaccinated, who don't have any human rights now, isn't it - according to the US Supreme Court Law of 2013, anyone who is synthetically mRNA vaccinated is no longer human and all human rights are lost = zero trans human rights, which you now are - so that is OK then, right?
Was me them, I would not touch their vaccines with a barge pole, talking about which, when you sup with the Devil, use a looooong spoon!!
I knew that it wouldn’t stop transmission before it was rolled out and it’s not because I’m a doctor or scientist. It’s because I pay attention and I read literature. There are three ways people could have known that these didn’t stop transmission if they wanted to. The media didn’t want to know. Neither did the politicians, pharmacists or doctors.
1. people were saying that it didn’t really stop transmission. Bourla, for example. And Fauci even said that the focus of the vaccine was not to stop transmission. When asked in an interview about stopping transmission, Fauci said something to the effect that they were going to first focus on slowing down the disease and then look at stopping transmission later. Something like that. I had a link saved about it but the link has probably been destroyed.
2. No vaccine actually stop transmission because there is something called original antigen sin. If you introduce antibodies in the blood through an injection, it means that your body is able to fight the virus once it gets into the bloodstream. In order for it to get into the bloodstream, you have to contract the disease. If it is a respiratory disease, you will get lots of viral load in the mucosal later before it reaches the blood.
3. the Pfizer documents submitted to request grant for EUA stated that they did not test for reduced mortality, hospitalization or transmission.
The main idea of this lunacy is that transmission of any virus has never been proven...how it occurs and what are the dynamics of transmission. This idiot cannot test mRNA gene altering injections for transmission because the variables and methods for how a virus might be transmitted are UNKNOWN.
Is there any wonder why the God of heaven (who cannot lie) will judge & pour out His wrath on liars? (Those who willingly choose to continue in their lies)
Lol, for all you normies, welcome to domestic enemy media lies 101.
Exhibit 1-
1). Guy with actual legal liability makes vague statement, that’s ambiguous and can be taken either way.
“Yeah, so our vaccine needs to be checked if it stops transmission, I mean, that’s how vaccines always work…and we made a vaccine, so…. But yeah, we need to check it.”
2). Politician who can’t be fired, has no liability, and who has the protection of the enemy combatant media spins the vague statement. “Well when you’re vaccinated you stop the spread of disease.”
3). Subversive, subhuman media tosses the line in the water. “Well there you have it folks, if you get vaccinated against COVID, you won’t spread it.”
4). Every single other media organization cites the original Tokyo Rose media statement, and runs their versions of the same story.
5). Treasonous comedians and late night hosts cement the narrative into the lexicon.
I’ve watched them do some iteration of this over and over and over again.
Sarah Palins quote “I can see Russia from my house” (SNL line originally, that the politicians picked up and used, then the media reported it, then the late night talk show ran with it.)
Rolling Stones “article” about people overdosing on ivermectin.
Trumps “Mexicans are rapists” when he was talking about MS13.
Trumps “neo Nazis are good people” when he specifically called out the neo Nazis as bad.
And assault rifles are “machine guns”.
A few examples amongst many, but this is how the game is played.
Then he’s a moron. The correct answer is, “No. Those who receive the shot have been getting infected and spreading the virus for some time now.”
Indeed. The transfection weren't tested for transmission during trials. Then in the real world during Delta it became obvious. Then during omicron, blatantly obvious. I suspect that it wasn't stopping transmission pre-delta but the virus wasn't quite as infectious then anyway.
The cited quote occurred before the shot rollout. The reality is none of the vaxxes, even prior to this set, have stopped infection or transmission. They never can. Think about it.
If Mike receives a COVID shot or whatever, he's now infected. His body will try whatever means it can to eliminate the contents inserted. One method is through shedding via respiration, perspiration, defecation, etc. If jabbed or unjabbed Tom is exposed to those contaminated secretions, he also will become infected. Tom's body will do the same thing as Mike's. Whether or not either of them becomes symptomatic is not relevant. Their bodies must get rid of this unwanted stuff.
Humans have been creating and spreading diseases to sicken and kill our own species since before Christ was born. In ca. 6th century, some in the targeted groups began experimenting with inoculations for the very nasty ones. By the time the first vax (smallpox) was deployed in the US in the early 1800s, those who studied history already knew this ritual wouldn't stop infection or transmission.
Bourla changed his mind in June 2021 without any Pfizer studies.
https://twitter.com/AlbertBourla/status/1402240820120592393
But Pfizer was lying about it in Jan 2021:
https://twitter.com/ianmSC/status/1580983687205691392
A vet and a software salesman and a bunch of folks who want to depopulate the globe
Yes. This frog-necked eugenics freak has been all over with his announcements.
"Excited to share that updated analysis from our Phase 3 study with BioNTech also showed that our COVID-19 vaccine was 100% effective in preventing #COVID19 cases in South Africa. 100%!
https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-confirm-high-efficacy-and-no-serious"
Same from the the press release: "Vaccine was 100% effective in preventing COVID-19 cases in South Africa, where the B.1.351 lineage is prevalent" (=Beta variant.)
The experimental gene therapy has never prevented infection, just reduced symptoms during a short time window but the price is awful risk and negative efficacy later. Regarding to negative efficacy (and possible ADE), the vaccine antibody-escaping variants are already raging at >10%!, see info from CDC insider: https://twitter.com/DrEricDing/status/1580749470580453376?s=20&t=o3uezaStAKdMRF_OGVZE0A
You should read the article about the couple who invented the vaccine on a computer in an afternoon, without any virus or evidence of a virus being present when they did that. They were so busy in their lab, they only took time off to be married, before going back into their lab and carrying on where they left off. Probably being married meant that they shared the same table for their experiments, instead of separate ones - ain't love sweet. Apparently they are together worth Billions, yet the male of the pair still rides his bike to work and home again - bet neither of them have had their vaccines - my guess is that they would try them out on lab animals first, to see how effective their vaccines are - hang on a moment, that is all of you vaccinated, who don't have any human rights now, isn't it - according to the US Supreme Court Law of 2013, anyone who is synthetically mRNA vaccinated is no longer human and all human rights are lost = zero trans human rights, which you now are - so that is OK then, right?
Was me them, I would not touch their vaccines with a barge pole, talking about which, when you sup with the Devil, use a looooong spoon!!
Information all shadow banned from Facebook!!!! Probably Twitter too.
As for Bourla statement....yes. And that’s why with trump it was initially only for seniors!!!!!
It was the Biden whitehouse that opened it up to all age groups and brought the mandates in!!!! The media allowed this to happen!!!!
I was only around vaccinated people when I caught COVID. All the people I was around were vaccinated. I also had RSV in addition to COVID.
Shocking! Just shocking! 🙄
I knew that it wouldn’t stop transmission before it was rolled out and it’s not because I’m a doctor or scientist. It’s because I pay attention and I read literature. There are three ways people could have known that these didn’t stop transmission if they wanted to. The media didn’t want to know. Neither did the politicians, pharmacists or doctors.
1. people were saying that it didn’t really stop transmission. Bourla, for example. And Fauci even said that the focus of the vaccine was not to stop transmission. When asked in an interview about stopping transmission, Fauci said something to the effect that they were going to first focus on slowing down the disease and then look at stopping transmission later. Something like that. I had a link saved about it but the link has probably been destroyed.
2. No vaccine actually stop transmission because there is something called original antigen sin. If you introduce antibodies in the blood through an injection, it means that your body is able to fight the virus once it gets into the bloodstream. In order for it to get into the bloodstream, you have to contract the disease. If it is a respiratory disease, you will get lots of viral load in the mucosal later before it reaches the blood.
3. the Pfizer documents submitted to request grant for EUA stated that they did not test for reduced mortality, hospitalization or transmission.
Journalism in corporate media is dead.
The answer was always NO. The "vaccines" don't sterilise the upper airway passages for a start.
Hi Dr. Paul.
Wanted to send you this, it's so true it gave me goosebumps.
https://rumble.com/v1nujz6--amazing-the-sound-of-silenced-science-the-adverse-events-featuring-the-spi.html
Hi Dr. Paul.
Wanted to send you this, it's so true it gave me goosebumps.
https://rumble.com/v1nujz6--amazing-the-sound-of-silenced-science-the-adverse-events-featuring-the-spi.html
The main idea of this lunacy is that transmission of any virus has never been proven...how it occurs and what are the dynamics of transmission. This idiot cannot test mRNA gene altering injections for transmission because the variables and methods for how a virus might be transmitted are UNKNOWN.
Is there any wonder why the God of heaven (who cannot lie) will judge & pour out His wrath on liars? (Those who willingly choose to continue in their lies)
Dr Alexander, if you get time check out the excuses being offered by "fact checkers" for excess deaths in Australia:
Matt Canavan raised questions about what's causing Australia's excess deaths. So what is really happening?
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-10-14/fact-check-matt-canavan-craig-kelly-excess-deaths/101527734
Dr Alexander, if you get time check out the excuses being offered by "fact checkers" for excess deaths in Australia:
Matt Canavan raised questions about what's causing Australia's excess deaths. So what is really happening?
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-10-14/fact-check-matt-canavan-craig-kelly-excess-deaths/101527734
Has his head been examined?