I have always said, if a proper legal court with a judge says they must hang for the COVID deaths they have caused, then they must hang! I will not argue against a judge's ruling, would you?
If it's about money, then these fact-checkers should go after Pfizer, which was charged 2.3 billion dollars in the largest healthcare related fine. Pfizer routinely defrauds and harms the public. Show me one 'anti-vax' website/author which was involved in anything resembling the scale of the following:
1994 - Pfizer paid 200 million dollars in lawsuits.
2002- Pfizer paid 49 million dollars in a fraud case.
2008 - Pfizer was publicly recognized in the mainstream news because of manipulation of studies
2009 - Pfizer paid 750 million dollars to settle 35,000 claims about their drug Rezulin. This drug 'only' caused the death of 63 people (compare to the tens of thousands at minimum in VAERS due to the covid vaccines).
2009 - Pfizer fined 2.3 billion dollars for paying kickbacks to doctors and illegally promoting their drugs.
We know why they don't go after Pfizer. They're the bootlickers for the most corrupt and powerful, desperate to lick some crumbs off the floor and get pats on the head.
That was extremely painful to read if Bragman quotes and aligns himself with the Southern Poverty Law Center that’s all I had to see to be comfortable in discrediting his credibility not that he had much with me from the outset of his Covidian dialect. He clearly has had one too many MRNA bioweapons injected into his sheepish brain. It’s no wonder where he stands relative to political science over science. I suggest you simply right back I was there you weren’t. For a few seconds I felt sorry for the guy as he is completely brainwashed and brain injured. Whether he is a Karen or a Ken he is to pitied. As the saying goes, “when there is flack you are over the territory.” And my other favorite from the late Great Dr. Zelenko, “ I am not antivax I am anti stupid.”
My my, they don't like when their Public Health (fascism) scheme is criticized and scrutinized. This is virtue signaling to their Covidian base and a wrap up smear tactic. SPLC...🤮
This is why we desperately need to bring BACK the free market in healthcare and surgically remove government. That way you can chose to listen to Bragman and all the negative consequences that would bring, or to Dr A and crew. I chose freedom and Dr Alexander and thus true health
God help all of us! The irony of it all is the real haters are hunting down those of us who just want to be left alone Groups such as the Southern Poverty Law Center are the virus and a true Pandemic of evil!
I'd like to offer a different perspective. Must we always think of killing as the solution? Don't you think this course is rather antiquated and barbaric? Really - execution? Can we please go beyond this caveman thinking? Is there nothing else we can think of? Are we really so bereft of ideas? And just say we killed all of them - then what? Do you really think that would solve the problem for long? We have used that strategy since the beginning of time, and what has it achieved? Only temporary "relief". It doesn't solve things for long and actually it solves nothing because we haven't identified the problem, we've just identified the persons with a problem but not the problem itself. What is the problem itself? Do we even ask ourselves this? I say the problem is control. The solution is individual sovereignty and the pillar of individual sovereignty is freedom of speech. If we disgraced censorship in all its forms (blocking, banning, etc) there would be hardly any crime at all. Why? Because psychopaths shun the light. They make the laws and wangle themselves into positions of power. There can be no power-over if free speech was upheld above all, if censorship were disgraced and held in contempt. But everyone does it, everyone censors, even small people like us. And if the people do it, then the power mongers will do it and if the people condemn censorship, the power mongers cannot get a leg in. So simple hey? Killing anyone only keeps us in the same frequency of death. We need to get out of it and be in a regenerative condition. Our thinking is what makes it so. The people need to claim their individual sovereignty of which body autonomy is part of that claim. Then we will all be safe, we will be able to walk the streets again at any time of day. We will be free at last. It is by the psychos hoarding information that they can thrive. Psychopaths shun the light. They will have nowhere to hide when they don't have their shield of censorship. Free speech means freedom. It's so simple.
I am proud to have been an early reader of and early donor to the very worthy non-profit Brownstone Institute. It's one of the best sources of dependable, truthful information on public health and society in general.
I don't have the resources to research Bragman's accusations and criticisms of Jeffrey Tucker's history and CV. I know Mr. Tucker by his valuable work over the past two years. Bragman's hit piece is an ineffective exercise in indignation.
If it's about money, then these fact-checkers should go after Pfizer, which was charged 2.3 billion dollars in the largest healthcare related fine. Pfizer routinely defrauds and harms the public. Show me one 'anti-vax' website/author which was involved in anything resembling the scale of the following:
1994 - Pfizer paid 200 million dollars in lawsuits.
2002- Pfizer paid 49 million dollars in a fraud case.
2008 - Pfizer was publicly recognized in the mainstream news because of manipulation of studies
2009 - Pfizer paid 750 million dollars to settle 35,000 claims about their drug Rezulin. This drug 'only' caused the death of 63 people (compare to the tens of thousands at minimum in VAERS due to the covid vaccines).
2009 - Pfizer fined 2.3 billion dollars for paying kickbacks to doctors and illegally promoting their drugs.
We know why they don't go after Pfizer. They're the bootlickers for the most corrupt and powerful, desperate to lick some crumbs off the floor and get pats on the head.
(Further info: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1610375042940153856.html)
That was extremely painful to read if Bragman quotes and aligns himself with the Southern Poverty Law Center that’s all I had to see to be comfortable in discrediting his credibility not that he had much with me from the outset of his Covidian dialect. He clearly has had one too many MRNA bioweapons injected into his sheepish brain. It’s no wonder where he stands relative to political science over science. I suggest you simply right back I was there you weren’t. For a few seconds I felt sorry for the guy as he is completely brainwashed and brain injured. Whether he is a Karen or a Ken he is to pitied. As the saying goes, “when there is flack you are over the territory.” And my other favorite from the late Great Dr. Zelenko, “ I am not antivax I am anti stupid.”
My my, they don't like when their Public Health (fascism) scheme is criticized and scrutinized. This is virtue signaling to their Covidian base and a wrap up smear tactic. SPLC...🤮
It’s all about money, control and depopulation.
This is why we desperately need to bring BACK the free market in healthcare and surgically remove government. That way you can chose to listen to Bragman and all the negative consequences that would bring, or to Dr A and crew. I chose freedom and Dr Alexander and thus true health
God help all of us! The irony of it all is the real haters are hunting down those of us who just want to be left alone Groups such as the Southern Poverty Law Center are the virus and a true Pandemic of evil!
I'd like to offer a different perspective. Must we always think of killing as the solution? Don't you think this course is rather antiquated and barbaric? Really - execution? Can we please go beyond this caveman thinking? Is there nothing else we can think of? Are we really so bereft of ideas? And just say we killed all of them - then what? Do you really think that would solve the problem for long? We have used that strategy since the beginning of time, and what has it achieved? Only temporary "relief". It doesn't solve things for long and actually it solves nothing because we haven't identified the problem, we've just identified the persons with a problem but not the problem itself. What is the problem itself? Do we even ask ourselves this? I say the problem is control. The solution is individual sovereignty and the pillar of individual sovereignty is freedom of speech. If we disgraced censorship in all its forms (blocking, banning, etc) there would be hardly any crime at all. Why? Because psychopaths shun the light. They make the laws and wangle themselves into positions of power. There can be no power-over if free speech was upheld above all, if censorship were disgraced and held in contempt. But everyone does it, everyone censors, even small people like us. And if the people do it, then the power mongers will do it and if the people condemn censorship, the power mongers cannot get a leg in. So simple hey? Killing anyone only keeps us in the same frequency of death. We need to get out of it and be in a regenerative condition. Our thinking is what makes it so. The people need to claim their individual sovereignty of which body autonomy is part of that claim. Then we will all be safe, we will be able to walk the streets again at any time of day. We will be free at last. It is by the psychos hoarding information that they can thrive. Psychopaths shun the light. They will have nowhere to hide when they don't have their shield of censorship. Free speech means freedom. It's so simple.
Indeed. The law on these things is well established.
I am proud to have been an early reader of and early donor to the very worthy non-profit Brownstone Institute. It's one of the best sources of dependable, truthful information on public health and society in general.
I don't have the resources to research Bragman's accusations and criticisms of Jeffrey Tucker's history and CV. I know Mr. Tucker by his valuable work over the past two years. Bragman's hit piece is an ineffective exercise in indignation.
😡