26 Comments

Total Bull Shit terror of the citizens by the government and globalists again.

Expand full comment

Hamas attacks Europe? But Hamas is Israel. Israel represents hard core zionists. They want to be masters of the planet, they want to depopulate useless goyims. I don't believe all those fake narratives blaming "hamas" as grass root Palestinian resistance against Israel and fighting the west in the same time. All world leaders claiming they are zionists, as Biden, Trump and few others, participate in Israel's crime.

Expand full comment

It'shard to know how much "news"is propaganda designed to legitimize an attack by tbe State on the freedoms of white Christians. However, keep in mind that Israel has been killing hostages. In the case of the killing in the story at the link they were unable to blame the killing on the HAMAS terrorists. Some of the truth has got out:

White House says IDF accidental killing of three Israeli hostages is 'heartbreaking and tragic' after they were mistaken for Hamas terrorists during brutal fighting in Gaza

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12869929/gaza-israel-IDF-hostages-biden-white-house-killing.html

Expand full comment

One must be careful to sift the news diligently. This story originates from the Mossad.

Digest with care.

Expand full comment

If the story is true and arabs or muslims are pulling this middle-eastern shit in white Christian European countries then those countries need to have zero tolerance for it. It is no excuse that the presence of Jewish institutions makes these countries targets for terrorism. Arabs and muslims need a reality check. It is long past time for many middle easterners to get the f*ck out of Europe and take their issues with them. Many Palestinians should go bsck to their native Palestine. The biblical lands are not in Europe. If they lay claim to those lands they need to get the f*ck back there. Their claim that the Jews stole their land is not Europe's problem. It is a shame if Europe is still having these sorts of social problems long after the state of Israel was created.

Expand full comment

'Israel's 9/11' is the gift that just keeps on giving - and not only to the neo-fascist rulers of this max-vaxxed state and role model/laboratory for the technocrats pushing for world control via The Great Reset.

The "surprise" Hamas breakout from the Gaza concentration camp (hardly a surprise, as the IDF knew what was being planned at least a year in advance) has done far more than provide a pretext to implement Israel's long-planned military final solution to the "Palestine problem".

It has taken Israel and their Western backers a step nearer to seizing and exploiting the massive virgin offshore gas and oilfields off the Gaza coast. These are estimated to contain over a trillion cubic meters of untapped gas alone. (So sucks to you, Mr Putin!).

The Hamas horror story is also being galvanised to usher in a new phase of the flagging global War on Terror, this time targeting the UK and EU nations already in an economic and social doldrums as a result of suicidal policies adopted during the Great Covid Con.

But hey! - let's be thankful for small mercies. The way things are going, Globocap might not have to start a third world war. . . yet.

Expand full comment

Funny that I have to find out from you that a possible terrorist has been arrested in my country (Netherlands). They did raise the terror threat level a few days ago but that must be because of the far right conspiracy theorists.

Expand full comment

🤣😂

The gov is scaring you to take control over you.

Not that they don’t pay an Arab or 2. Does 911 sound familiar. Do you see the “Arab “ or I am sorry “ Hamas” passports dropped on the Lego factory entrances ?

Expand full comment

News has gotten out that Israel has killed three hostages in Gaza. It was not possible to blame the killings on HAMAS. The IDF are claiming the killings were a "mistake." The report of the killings lends credence to the claims by some that the IDF might also have responsible for the killings of Israelis eatlier that were blamed on the HAMAS terrorists. There is a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth about the deaths of the three hostages, which is understandable. However, contrast it with the callous indifference to, and in some cases sadistic enjoyment of, the mass killing of thousands of children and other civilians by the IDF in Gaza. These children and other civilians seem to be regarded by their killers as subhumans. What's happening is reminiscent of hiw a certain regime in Europe in the early to mid last century that also regarded itself as a "chosen people" mater race slaughtered disproportionately in retaliation for attacks on its members. This is beginning to approach the level of depravity of the Americans when they bombed little kids with Napalm in Vietnam. The British at least responded to IRA atrocities ethically. What is happening now is morally no better than how Nazis or Americans have behaved.

Expand full comment

Oh sorry the tulip farms.

That legos are for the Denmark part of the story.

Expand full comment

Absolutely

Expand full comment

Smells like bullshit. Hamas has no reason whatsoever to cause trouble in Germany or the Netherlands. Israel, on the other hand, would love for Hamas to be seen as a threat within those countries. Case closed.

Expand full comment

Israel runs terrorist groups. Once, when France was talking about recognizing Palestine as a state, Bibi-the-baby-butcher threatened that France would pay a price if they did it. Then, afterwards, France was struck by a massive wave of terrorists attacks. These make no sense if those attackers had sympathy for Palestine. But if they were being controlled by strings pulled from Israel, then it makes perfect sense.

Pasting a message here that has links to Bibi’s threat against France, then a graphic showing terrorism in France before and after Bibi’s threat:

If Hamas was created by Israel, consider the possibility Hamas was created to misrepresent Gazans, and to act in ways that give Israel the pretenses to destroy and plunder Gaza.

Is there evidence Israel has done such things? Yes, plenty. Books on Israeli terrorism: these books establish the pattern.

Rise & Kill First

Ronen Bergman

Israels Sacred Terrorism

Livia Rokach

Hidden History of Zionism

Ralph Schoenman

Ben Gurion's Scandals: How the Haganah & the Mossad Eliminated Jews

Naeim Giladi

State of Terror

Thom Suarez

The IDF's fence was more instrumented, monitored and patrolled than probably any other concentration camp fence anywhere, ever. FIFTEEN breeches, explosives, trucks driving through... On every other day, if a dog touched the fence snipers would be alerted and jeeps dispatched.

The IDF stood down for seven hours. Israeli's who served that duty, securing the concentration camp barrier, are objecting and concluding there must have been a stand down order:

https://www.globalresearch.ca/speculation-mark-hamas-attack-allowed-close-book-palestine/5836029

Consider a previous example of remarkable timing.

Netanyahu threatens France because they were considering recognition of Palestinian statehood.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1146512

Then, look at the tsunami of terrorism that began in France immediately after his threat:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-33288542

Included among this cluster of terrorist acts in France was the Bataclan attack.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/November_2015_Paris_attacks

Ronen Bergman’s book Rise & Kill First documents Israeli covert control over nominally Arab or Lebanese Terrorist groups in Lebanon. Bergman claims these groups were committing so many terrorists acts that they were a large fraction of planetary terrorism.

And Ostrovsky, in By Way of Deception, claims Israel was running the terrorist group that hijacked the Achille Lauro and killed Leon Klinghoffer.

With this as background, and with knowledge of Israel’s creation of and support for Hamas, is there a chance Israel pulled the strings on this Hamas attack? Consider the improbability that Hamas would pick THE single day when every instrument, vibration sensor, video camera and motion detection system failed. And not only do the Hamas fighters get through the fence, they are given HOURS, to do their dirty work. The shear improbability of this justifies speculation, especially when there are known precedents.

After all, wasn’t Israel always doing these remote control, false-flag, terrorist operations for political gain, to discredit Israel’s victims, to turn those victims into (apparent but not real) aggressors and thereby give Israel pretense to commit more massacres and more ethnic cleansings and more unrestrained violence all the while pretending to be victims?

If you own and control enough media, you can easily deceive the western world and have them clamoring, as after 9/11, for brutal vengeance against countries actually innocent of the accusations against them. And if there is no hell, they will get cleanly away with it because brainwashed people think they are acting justly and righteously when they are actually murdering innocents on behalf of masterful liars. Netanyahu is a masterful liar. And he has essentially complete control of western main stream media and politicians such that NO ONE dares question the narrative on the big networks or before the houses of congress.

Expand full comment

There's virtually not a single day go by that Muslims, somewhere, are not murdering innocent people. The Qur'an is a wall to wall death cult, of rape, torture, murder, capture, slavery, and all endorsed and sanctioned by Allah and the Prophet.

Expand full comment

Hmm. Now what?

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Spoken like someone who gets all his experiences from Zionist-controlled news and TV in America.

Expand full comment

Richard Dawkins in his book "The God Delusion" and in other statements is correct about islam, e.g., "Islam is the greatest force for evil in the world today." However, many muslim countries have far lower rates of criminality than in the USA. Further, surveys extending back many years have found that 7% of Americans and Canadians say they would kill in God's name. All it would take is a not improbable malfunction in your temporal lobes and you could be one of them.

"Qatar continues its reign as the safest country in the world, according to the latest Numbeo Crime Index by Country 2023. 

Qatar has topped the index in the last five years after regaining the number one spot from Japan in 2019. Japan claimed the title in 2018 from Qatar, which was number one in 2017." 

Qatar ranked safest country in the world

https://thepeninsulaqatar.com/article/15/01/2023/qatar-ranked-safest-country-in-the-world#:~:text=Qatar%20continues%20its%20reign%20as,was%20number%20one%20in%202017.

"Of the men who reported a religious experience, attended church weekly, and displayed elevated complex partial epileptic like signs (5.7% of all males), 44% stated they would kill another person if God told them to do so."

"I Would Kill in God's Name:” Role of Sex, Weekly Church Attendance, Report of a Religious Experience, and Limbic Lability

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.2466/pms.1997.85.1.128

Expand full comment

Some Islamic countries have the violence under control, when 98% of the population obeys Islam, does their daily prayers, worships at their mosque's, none dare speak out, all dissention is verboten, no Democracy. But consider Iran, where a few brave women have disobeyed wearing their despicable Hijab, where protestors are shot dead in the streets, the prisons are full of citizens being raped and tortured and murdered, where 30,000 people were executed, by their current ruler.

Expand full comment

The Iranians butchered 30,000. The US, in contrast, is now known to have butchered one million plus in Iraq. US troops slaughtered these people in record time. Not even the German Nazis killed so efficiently. Many of the civilian lives snuffed out by the US were children, women and elderly. See 1. What did this US evil achieve, apart from the rise of ISIS? Has it made the US safer? Worldwide, and especially in MENA, only Israel is more hated than the US. The consequences were disastrous. See 2. One thing the US actions achieved was the empowernent of Iran. The world can thank the US. See 3.

1. "More than 1,000,000 Iraqis murdered," September 2007. Opinion Research Business.

Revised casualty analysis. New analysis ‘confirms’ 1 million+ Iraq casualties

February 19, 2009, at the Wayback Machine. Jan. 28, 2008. Opinion Research Business. Word Viewer for .doc files.

"On Friday, September 14 2007, ORB International, an independent polling agency located in London, published estimates of the total war casualties in Iraq since the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003. At over 1.2 million deaths (1,220,580), this estimate is the highest number published so far. From the poll margin of error of +/-2.5% ORB calculated a range of 733,158 to 1,446,063 deaths. The ORB estimate was performed by a random survey of 1,720 adults aged 18+, out of which 1,499 responded, in fifteen of the eighteen governorates within Iraq, between August 12 and August 19, 2007. In comparison, the 2006 Lancet survey suggested almost half this number (654,965 deaths) through the end of June 2006. The Lancet authors calculated a range of 392,979 to 942,636 deaths."

2). U.S. grapples with forces unleashed by Iraq invasion 20 years later

https://www.reuters.com/world/us-grapples-with-forces-unleashed-by-iraq-invasion-20-years-later-2023-03-16/

3. How the Iraq War Has Empowered Iran

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-the-iraq-war-has-empowered-iran/

Expand full comment

Couple other comparisons is how Hamas deliberately targets civilians, women and children, uses them as human shields. Israel does the opposite, warns civilians to evacuate. Same with Russia, they target civilians and residential areas to bomb, Ukraine targets military installations. It's easy to see who the good and bad guys are.

Expand full comment

Of course the invasion was a big mistake. Those death totals are all over the map, from 151,000 to 1,033,00. What part were the American war effort, and what part were the insurgency, and what part were Iraqi's killing each other? It's not fair to say the "Americans" butchered anyone. A major war like that will have many casualties, but we've never deliberately targeted vulnerable citizens, other than a few outliers like the My Lai massacre, and other atrocities. Even dropping the atomic bomb on Japan, the intention wasn't to mass execute citizens, but we knew many would die. We dropped warning leaflets to the Japanese. Sure, go back through history and we have the Indian wars massacres, even massacres of striking union members. But it's never been official policy of the USA military to do this. Going to Iran, those executions were deliberate and were the official policy of that Islamic dictatorship. In no way can you compare those executions with any American actions.

Expand full comment

The Iranians have a vile regime which, like the vile Saudi regime, is propped up and empowered by the US. If not for US empowerment of the Iranian regime the Iranian prople might have risen up and overthrown it by now. The Iranians kill with impunity, safe in the knowledge that the US attacks powerful countries only ever in proxy wars. The US has also empowere muslims in Europe, where the US sided with Kosovar muslims in their waer agaist Christian Serbia. The Iranians would be aware that inInl its non-proxy wars of aggression, the US only ever targets small, weak, usually third world and usually secular, countries. As regards US butchery and genocide, it has been the norm in evey foreign conflict the US has ever created or been involved in, from the Philipines to Haiti, to WW2, to Korea, to Vidtnam, to Iraq, to Afghanistan. The documented war crimes of the US are too numerous to note. Butchery, although covered up, has been the noerm. Let's just take US behavior in the Philippines for an example, even though US personnel have behaved similarly in other conflicts. Knowledge of the history of the US in the Philippines passed down from generation to generation is possinly even one of the factors that has inspired the islamic insurgency in the Philippines.

"During the Philippine–American War (1899–1913), numerous war crimes were committed by the U.S. military against Filipino civilians. American soldiers and other witnesses sent letters home which described some of these atrocities; for example, In November 1901, the Manila correspondent of the Philadelphia Ledger wrote:

The present war is no bloodless, opera bouffe engagement; our men have been relentless, have killed to exterminate men, women, children, prisoners and captives, active insurgents and suspected people from lads of ten up, the idea prevailing that the Filipino as such was little better than a dog...

In an editorial written by Clinton Coulter, published in the San Francisco Call in July 1899, he wrote that an "officer of the Oregon regiment", while being entertained at his home, told Colter that "Americans immediately upon entering a captured village would proceed to ransack every house, church, and even hold up the natives and procure everything of value, also that all the natives discovered coming toward the lines with a flag of truce were shot down." In 1899, the American Anti-Imperialist League published a pamphlet of letters which documented abuses against civilians by the U.S. Army and Marine Corps.

A letter of a soldier from New York reported:

The town of Titatia was surrendered to us a few days ago, and two companies occupy the same. Last night one of our boys was found shot and his stomach cut open. Immediately orders were received from General Wheaton to burn the town and kill every native in sight; which was done to a finish. About 1,000 men, women and children were reported killed. I am probably growing hard-hearted, for I am in my glory when I can sight my gun on some dark skin and pull the trigger.

During the March across Samar, Brigadier General Jacob H. Smith ordered Major Littleton Waller, commanding officer of a battalion of 315 U.S. Marines assigned to Smith's forces in Samar, to kill all persons "who are capable of bearing arms in actual hostilities" over the age of ten years old

General Smith ordered Waller: "I want no prisoners. I wish you to kill and burn, the more you kill and burn the better it will please me. I want all persons killed who are capable of bearing arms in actual hostilities against the United States." [...] Waller demanded "to know the limit of age to respect." He was told "ten years of age."

Miller, Stuart Creighton (1982). Benevolent Assimilation: The American Conquest of the Philippines, 1899–1903. Yale University Press. p. 220. ISBN 978-0-300-16193-9. Retrieved 17 November 2022. 

Expand full comment

Sure many examples of atrocities committed by Americans during conflicts. My position is that if you were in Congress, and had this debate among the legislators of those times, the Congressional leadership would not endorse such atrocities. Officers on the battlefield had their own evil designs that our country wasn't able to restrict due to the poor communications of that era, and probably a poor chain of command. In more modern times, when such atrocities occur, those responsible have been held liable, such as with the My Lai massacre. I don't believe that it's ever been a official United States policy to commit such atrocities. On the other hand, Irans top leadership, their top government, have all committed and endorsed such atrocities. Raisi president of Iran personally led the executions of the 30,000. The Oct 7 attack on Israel had the full endorsement and backing of the Iranian leadership.

Expand full comment