18 Comments
founding

I want to make sure that I understand a point you have made over and over. the virus in the jabs are non sterilized and non neutralized. Does that mean that the jabbed are acting as petri dishes and growing variants that they can tramsmit? If so the flu and cold season is going to be a shit show.

Expand full comment

An open mind is all that one needs to understand the truth about anything. Thank you Dr. Paul.

Expand full comment

This is not a state of the art actuarial study. Sorry but this study is lame. If you want to get to the bottom of whether or not excess deaths are covid or clot shot related, excess mortality must be analyzed in the vaxxed and unvaxxed cohorts separately. Furthermore, data has to be scrubbed to ensure that people who died within 14 days of vaccination are actually counted as vaxxed and not as unvaxxed. This new definition of unvaxxed was thrown in there intentionally to confuse the people.

Another study that can be done is to simply analyze some of the most prevalent adverse events in both the vaxxed and unvaxxed cohorts. I.e. look for the frequency of pulmonary embolisms and myocarditis. You will find that only the vaxxed cohorts shows a massive increase in those conditions. I really hate the fact that all the so called experts pretend that somehow it is unclear whether the vaxx or or the covid is the cause. It is clear and it is easy to prove.

Expand full comment

The argument whether covid or clot shots are responsible could be easily put to rest by doing the following (and as an actuary, I am disappointed that the recent SOA study of excess deaths did not go down that road). Simply analyze excess deaths in the vaxxed and the unvaxxed cohorts separately. This will undoubtably show that all excess deaths incurred in the vaxxed. Also, the deceased's family have an strong motive in classifying the death as covid related instead of vaxx related since most insurance companies wouldn't pay out claims if it was due to the experimental gene therapy.

The issue is really much easier to resolve than people pretend.

Expand full comment

Wow thanks for this statistical analysis I don’t know where else I would get such trusted details

I am a barber by trade and see so many ppl both jabbed and unjabbed just wondering what to expect as far as my exposure to all the new circulating viruses. I am taking plenty of supplements but I did get omicron in January (I am not jabbed) I was pretty sick for about 3 days I understand I have some natural immunity

I am not afraid but do want to know if I am walking into a firestorm every day

Expand full comment

what a load of complete garbage

Expand full comment

One more comment relating to the 2 standard deviation excess mortality. This is misleading and probably done intentionally by the authors of the study. They should have limited the analysis to 18 - 65 year olds. Once you add older people in the cohort, it lowers the number of std from the mean. This happens because the std in older cohorts is greater. I.e. the fluctuation in number of deaths from year to year is greater in older cohorts because certain events, such as a severe flu season for instance, will have a much greater impact on older people.

The other misleading factor is to include the non vaxxed in the study. My bet is that if you excluded the over 65 year olds and the unvaxxed, the number of standard deviations from the mean would likely be 4 stds or even higher. For perspective, 2 std signifies that the excess deaths could happen with a probability of 5% or 1 in 20 (actually only half of that because we are only interested in exceeding the upper bound). Whereas a 4 standard deviation event is something with a probability of 1 in 20,000. So this could happen by chance every 20,000 years. Once you get to 5 std, you are looking at an event of 1 in 2 million years.

Expand full comment