Here's something that's really sad. A prediction model with demonstrated past accuracy that does not use polling.
Northwestern University Model shows Harris Landslide 438-100
"A forecasting model developed by Northwestern Professor Thomas Miller shows seismic shift since the debate. The model Harris with a small lead of 288 to 250 prior to the debate. His model is not based on polling, but rather data from the Investor Prediction Markets, specifically PredictIt. You can get daily updates at virtualtout.com
From the university website:
Called “The Virtual Tout,” Miller’s system uses data from PredictIt, a prediction market where users bet real money on political races. Miller then uses that data to simulate one million hypothetical elections per hour to find the average outcome. By looking at each state as its own “market,” Miller can predict not just the popular vote but how the Electoral College will vote."
Harris is such a Machiavellian manipulator and sophist that it's very credible that the American people would vote for her in landslide proportions. Behind the calculated persona there is only an empty shell. A megalomaniac. The US has had some dud presidents but Harris would be in a league of her own.
(Just seeing your reply now. Never got notice of it, though I did get the standard e-mail about the "like.")
You describe her accurately. The more I listen to her, the more I realize she's not just an aging, "lucky" DEI party girl so driven to fame and power as to be agreeable to being used by Deep State actors -- but also more calculating and dangerous than I previously realized.
It's devastating to recognize how many Americans cannot see her for who she is and what she represents. Or is it that they do?
I'm afraid a Harris Presidency would be less a "dud" than a land mine.
The migrants eating cats and dogs stuff just plays to the Dem use against Trump of the line they used successfully against Goldwater: "In your guts you know he's nuts." And painting Kamala as a communist is backfiring. Americans believe it but it just makes them want to vote for her. They'd prefer AOC but they'll settle for Harris.
As long as Harris voters are happy with their daughters marrying Haitian refugees and illegal alien gang members from Latin America, they won't regret supporting the wrong candidate.
The fact that it's not looking good for Ted Cruz or Kellyanne Conway with regard to what sort of prospective spouse may appeal to their rebellious daughters but that nightmare could happen to Dems too
In the same way many Democrats and RINOs flaunt their 'pride' in their homosexual, transsexual, and Hamas-loving offspring, I expect they will see their Haitian refugee in-laws as yet more evidence of their wokeness and political 'sophistication.'
So we can agree on Covid ,
but fight over the "right" way to worship.
That's kinda sad.
Here's something that's really sad. A prediction model with demonstrated past accuracy that does not use polling.
Northwestern University Model shows Harris Landslide 438-100
"A forecasting model developed by Northwestern Professor Thomas Miller shows seismic shift since the debate. The model Harris with a small lead of 288 to 250 prior to the debate. His model is not based on polling, but rather data from the Investor Prediction Markets, specifically PredictIt. You can get daily updates at virtualtout.com
From the university website:
Called “The Virtual Tout,” Miller’s system uses data from PredictIt, a prediction market where users bet real money on political races. Miller then uses that data to simulate one million hypothetical elections per hour to find the average outcome. By looking at each state as its own “market,” Miller can predict not just the popular vote but how the Electoral College will vote."
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2024/9/18/2271346/-Northwestern-University-Model-shows-Harris-Landslide
This is an interesting methodology. The author's disclaimer states:
"Posting this for amusement purposes only."
I wasn't amused...
Harris is such a Machiavellian manipulator and sophist that it's very credible that the American people would vote for her in landslide proportions. Behind the calculated persona there is only an empty shell. A megalomaniac. The US has had some dud presidents but Harris would be in a league of her own.
(Just seeing your reply now. Never got notice of it, though I did get the standard e-mail about the "like.")
You describe her accurately. The more I listen to her, the more I realize she's not just an aging, "lucky" DEI party girl so driven to fame and power as to be agreeable to being used by Deep State actors -- but also more calculating and dangerous than I previously realized.
It's devastating to recognize how many Americans cannot see her for who she is and what she represents. Or is it that they do?
I'm afraid a Harris Presidency would be less a "dud" than a land mine.
Thanks for that link, Awake.
I actually believe that Haris will win. And the Right Wing will do nothing about it.
The migrants eating cats and dogs stuff just plays to the Dem use against Trump of the line they used successfully against Goldwater: "In your guts you know he's nuts." And painting Kamala as a communist is backfiring. Americans believe it but it just makes them want to vote for her. They'd prefer AOC but they'll settle for Harris.
As long as Harris voters are happy with their daughters marrying Haitian refugees and illegal alien gang members from Latin America, they won't regret supporting the wrong candidate.
The fact that it's not looking good for Ted Cruz or Kellyanne Conway with regard to what sort of prospective spouse may appeal to their rebellious daughters but that nightmare could happen to Dems too
In the same way many Democrats and RINOs flaunt their 'pride' in their homosexual, transsexual, and Hamas-loving offspring, I expect they will see their Haitian refugee in-laws as yet more evidence of their wokeness and political 'sophistication.'