Brilliant Mathew Crawford: "Who Helped Pave the Way for Remdesivir? An Explosive Conversation; The Plandemonium, Part 13"; worth the read and listen; Tomorrow at 1 PM Eastern, five researchers
who have collectively spent thousands of hours gathering information about the emergence of remdesivir as treatment for COVID-19 gather for a comprehensive discussion that includes roles by Dr. Malone
For more articles on the Plandemonium, click here.
Remdesivir is a drug with a strange history, and that became oddly inserted into the Plandemonium despite no history of success as a practical antiviral. The expensive drug became the standard of care in many hospitals, despite the fact that antivirals are not expected to be particularly effective more than about five days after symptomatic infection. Many people believe the drug to be a killer.
So, just how did remdesivir pass through the sieve of medical testing to emerge as a late stage COVID-19 treatment?
Tomorrow at 1 PM Eastern, five researchers who have collectively spent thousands of hours gathering information about the emergence of remdesivir as an accepted treatment for COVID-19 gather for a comprehensive discussion that includes roles played along the way by Dr. Robert Malone and COVID Early Treatment Foundation manager Steve Kirsch, among many others. If you care about this topic, you should join us live, or watch the recording.
Remdesivir has its place but if you goal is to inflate the numbers for unjabbed deaths and kill off noncompliant useless eaters who might otherwise recover it's important to get these unjabbed untermenschen on to a ventilator. Works like a charm.
"The findings refute the idea that a cytokine storm following COVID-19 – an overwhelming inflammation response causing organ failure – was responsible for a significant number of deaths. There was no evidence of multi-organ failure in the patients studied."
"So while COVID-19 may have put these patients in the hospital, it was actually an infection brought on by the use of a mechanical ventilator that was more likely to be the cause of death when this infection didn't respond to treatment."
Most COVID-19 Deaths May Be The Result of a Completely Different Infection : ScienceAlert
https://www.sciencealert.com/most-covid-19-deaths-may-be-the-result-of-a-completely-different-infection
I am trying to work out a well-formulated statement of the psychological control tools used in the process of steering doctors and the public in the strangely artificial rivalry between HCQ and remdesivir. It's a particularly parnicious false dichotomy that required putting some specific machinery in place, IMHO.
* DOMANE
* Chinese claims of narrowing testing to HCQ/CQ and remdesivir
* Trump press conference March 19, 2020 (who steered to that point?)
* Numerous studies on both, many rigged
* Boston Consulting Group and other mentions of remdesivir making it sound authoritatively justified, despite it being an expensive option with no track record of success
* The existence of so much polling data on the drugs during 2020 is suggestive of a monitered operation