21 Comments

Why are they remaining silent?

The US government funded bioweapon tried to kill them.

Surely, they must be pissed off?

Expand full comment

Anybody who points out "vaccine side effect" gets screamed-down.

How long can this persist? Look how long the Biden-crimes have been put on "hold".

Paradigm shift is poised to tip-over, though.

Just keep speaking the truth considerately. Make yourself reasonable and easy to hear-out, like RFK Jr. does.

(Debbie Wasserman Schultz is rumored to have breast-cancer, NOT myocarditis.)

Expand full comment

They might be not speaking out because their doctors are saying they are not sure why this happened. The doctors are all mystified. (Oh maybe you had a defect, maybe it’s genetic... doctors are coming up w every possible reason but the reason- (that other thing is so rare it’s probably not from that) the doctors who do this can not see clearly themselves due to these messages being drilled into them). My v injured friend had to see numerous doctors most of whom would not say it was the vaccine rather it was a complicated thing and they wanted to refer them to someone else. The doctors want someone else to tell them. She didn’t even get to see the right type of specialist until a year later, and he finally told her the truth. Plus most people aren’t sure if they can say it was the vaccine unless a doctor gives them permission, that expert opinion makes people ignore what they should know in their heart (no pun intended, but it does work, sorry).

Also probably most doctors don’t know yet how to do the tests to figure out if it is from the vax or maybe testing for that isn’t part of the standard protocol?The atmosphere in the hospitals and clinics was probably so high stress pro-vax that the idea of saying it was from the vax would make the dr feel like a weirdo, standing out -going against what is normal.

Expand full comment

The dots are touching now🥹😢

Expand full comment

So sad sacrificed his son.

Expand full comment

How do we stop the technocrats? They run our government. There is no alternative platform that has not been high jacked by them. I am wondering when we will find out that a social credit score system has existed for the past 20 years and now we will be taxed according to that score. It ain’t science fiction anymore, we are owned by the agents of the collective.

Expand full comment

There are several, blindingly obvious, therefore deliberate, toxicity risks evident in all these gene based injections.

1. Causing your body to make a foreign (non-self) protein will axiomatically cause your immune system to make a lethal attack upon every cell that your immune system tells it if infected or deranged, potentially tumorigenic. There’s no way around this. No product of this basic design is safe for mass market use.

2. Causing the body explicitly to express a toxic substance. Spike proteins are directly toxic, affecting coagulation through actions on platelets among other effects. Yet all four drug companies chose this target for their product? And I’m expected to believe this was coincidence? You’d pick the most stable component, which is anything but spike. You’d select the protein least similar to human (if you’re going to do this reckless thing) which would be anything but spike. Even low homologies can give rise to immune responses to your own, somewhat related molecules, in this case, syncytin-1, a vital hormone in reproduction and pregnancy. And as above, you’d pick the component with as little direct toxicity.

3. In the case of the two mRNA based injections, they picked lipid nanoparticles (LNP) for the formulation. This conveys the product everywhere in the body, where you definitely do not want it. Furthermore, LNP specifically accumulate in the ovaries and testicles. In relation to ovarian accumulation, this was well known to industry at least a decade ago. Choosing LNP in the light of that knowledge is unquestionably malfeasance and quite deliberate.

Those involved in making this as it is and then injecting it or other gene based products are guilty of malice aforethought.

Expand full comment