14 Comments

Slaughter our babies apparently not enough, so injure our mothers. We need death stats by gender. Us guys carry the X on one side and appears that men are dying more than women. Also, death stats should be compared with occupation to link mRNA status. Further, above stats are no where near reality as most women, like my own, will never link their rotten health to the vaccines at this point; therefore raw score is way way higher.

Expand full comment

Is there any consideration given to the fact that the ACE2 gene is on the X chromosome?

Expand full comment

Dr Paul Alexander In simple non scientific terms did Dr Fauci illegally fund Wunhan instructing the scientists in that lab to get infected Horseshoe Bats inject them with spike protein which is required for the Horseshoe Bat to pass on infection. Otherwise an infected Horseshoe Bat would not be able to infect a human The Bat required the Spike protein which Fauci instructed the scientists to inject in those bats which made the infection transmissible to human beings ultimately getting to the US and that project was funded by our tax dollars. Is that the true story. Please tell me. Thank you

Expand full comment

Fauci, as head of NIH, an organisation that oversees NIAID, financed an organisation called EcoHealth Alliance, which was led by Peter Dazsak (and involved people like 'Eddie Holmes' at the University of Syndey and 'Ian Lipkin').

EcoHealth Alliance partnered with Wuhan Institute of Virology to collect viral samples from the Yunnan province of China, along with other regions (collecting closely related samples as RaTG13).

At the same time, Ralph Baric, head of a BSL 3 lab at University of North Carolina, was engaging in serial passage of viruses in 'humanised mice' (genetically modified mice whose lungs behave more like a human's). This serial passage of viruses was done with the assistance of the Wuhan Institute of Virology's head, Zheng-Li Shi. This occurred during the 2014 ban on gain-of-function research, which included mammals (mice are mammals).

Ralph Baric would later conveniently 'remember', 2 years later, in 2016 that the research also financed EcoHealth Alliance. They were doing it, reportedly, for 'vaccine research'. Ralph Baric was vocal critic of the gain-of-function ban and an avid supporter of vaccine research. The Wuhan Institute of Virology also researches vaccines.

In terms of outbreak origins, the most likely origin point was an event in September-October 2019 during the Wuhan Military Games, where members of the PLA intersected with numerous military troops of other countries. It is suspected by The Daily Beagle that a PLA member who worked at the Wuhan Institute of Virology somehow got infected, and passed that infection onto other troops. Many troops - including French, Canadian, Germany and Swiss - all reported flu-like symptoms post-competition, before the wider public outbreak.

Citations:

"I Melt My Laptop's CPU To Find No-one Knows The Definition Of 'Gain-Of-Function'"

https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/i/81190600/no-one-truly-knows-the-definition-of-gain-of-function

"Vaccine Manufacturers Are Behind The Outbreaks"

https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/vaccine-manufacturers-are-behind

"The Wuhan Outbreak (It's Not Where You Think)"

https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/the-wuhan-outbreak-its-not-where

Also this ~256 timeline series of articles, which is largely incomplete, and others have made more extensive timeline documents than myself:

https://gitlab.com/TheUnderdog/general-research/-/blob/main/WuhanInvestigation/WuhanLabLeakTimeline.ods

Expand full comment

Check to make sure that Peter was part of Eco; not come across that link and it makes no sense. Wuhan is long time DOD funded operation. Tony, Eco, Baric all patsy cover for Pharmas nano fake vaxxes. Entire operation planned during the 80s initiated during the 70s and created during the 30s when autism became part of the Bilderberg Cartel eugenic transhumanism/transgenderism formula.

Expand full comment

Peter Daszak is announced explicitly on EcoHealth Alliance's own page:

https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/personnel/dr-peter-daszak

If you refer to the Substack articles I've written (Part 3 - the vaccine manufacturer outbreaks, is arguably the most crucial one to know), you will see all the coverage and the dots, including the lobbying by Ralph Baric, the NIAID greenlighting what was clearly gain-of-function, EcoHealth Alliance's announcement by Ralph Baric in the humanised mice research.

Or you can use the ~256 timeline articles in the .ODS spreadsheet, which have dates and summary comments, to get a rough idea of what occurred. This is just a oversimplified version to answer a query; there are way more moving parts.

Expand full comment

I appreciate the respect you have for one another. Thank you for your time and attention to detail.

Expand full comment

You will have to excuse my grave error.

I wrote 'Peter Strzok' (who is from the Russian collusion hoax) and not 'Peter Dazsak'.

Please forgive my error I will rectify my post.

Expand full comment

Ha! I was getting ready to ask for forgiveness for the misread on peter. Thanks for letting me know. :)

Expand full comment

Is it true that the Horseshoe Bat was the culprit and that it had to be inject with the spike protein in order to infect humans.

Expand full comment

But the horseshoe bats were in the Wuhan Lab or did Baric have the bats brought to North Carolina? Or just in Wuhan Institute with Virology's head, Zheng-Li Shi? Was Baric injecting mice with spike protein?

Expand full comment

Ralph Baric's work on humanised mice involved horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus).

See:

https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/i/85068890/but-that-wasnt-enough

Expand full comment

Thank you for that thorough explanation. It’s clear then that the US taxpayers financed the disaster caused by the Wuhan Lab after Fauci was told to stop gain of function research. Fauci would have a great deal more respect had he come clean from the beginning.

Expand full comment

Thanks for posting these kinds of studies. I am a bit puzzled in the conclusion that they concluded that the myocarditis was "mild and transient". Is that so that the paper could be published, perhaps because the data inside the study doesn't really support this assertion?

Expand full comment