By suppressing open scientific discussion, Fauci, Francis Collins, CDC, NIH, FDA, TWITTER, Facebook, Youtube etc. worked to severely harm science, devastated children, & devastated the US public
By suppressing open scientific discussion, Fauci, Francis Collins, CDC, NIH, FDA, TWITTER, Facebook, Youtube etc. worked to severely harm science, devastated children, & devastated the US public
All of these people violated & censored our 1st amendment rights; all we were doing was questioning the specious unscientific unsound COVID lunatic policies, yet were banned; they killed people!
Schwab is apparently sick. I can confirm that he supposedly took the vaccination. Let’s see how that shapes up. He was not attending the Davos/WEF opening ceremony.
The satanic democrats may yet prevent justice coming to the Covid psychopaths who lied 5 billion into taking their death shots. But final justice awaits the whole monstrous assembly.
Rev 21:8 "All liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death."
No time or patience for Congressional hearings. The are all corrupt in their commission or omission. McCarthy forced to challenge mandates a condition of his speakership. No time for more congressional theatre
The list of media that a FOIA uncovered is attrocious, don't forget snapchat, and even tiny little papers on Maryville Tn. How many people did they help kill? God help them!
Eric Ding Dong dimwit blocked me from Twitter after I linked a study done on Chlorine Dioxide...which by the way was listed on FDA website as a study being conducted at that time.
[PART ONE: EARLY TREATMENT ; PART TWO: THE COVID-19 VACCINES ]
TRANSCRIPT
13:10
DR. PETER McCULLOUGH: Final set of comments. Physician censorship and reprisal.
It is clear now that in the area of Covid that it's open season for censorship and reprisal, not just of physicians, but of nurses and patients and family members and others. And the censorship is because there is a global effort to mass vaccinate the population every six months. And anything that would deter from that is going to be censored.
So if a family member has lost a loved one after the vaccine, that event, if it's written somewhere, would have you censored.
We have widespread censorship in the medical literature now, in social media, and even in oral presentations.
I presented here on May 10th 2021. Five statements that I made here under oath are now subject of censorship and professional reprisal by the American Board of Internal Medicine. Every single statement I made just in my written remarks and my prepared remarks is cited.
The American Board of Internal Medicine, the Texas Medical Board, they don't have a monopoly on the truth.
No one holds medical truth. There are always two points of view on everything, or more.
And so Senator Johnson* has stepped in and called the American Board of Internal Medicine out to have a roundtable discussion on what's going on now is a giant sweep through the federation of medical boards through the American Board of Internal Medicine, American Board of Family Medicine, etcetera, and to have an open conversation. They have not responded, in fact they have doubled-down and said they're joining forces with the American Medical Association, again, in an effort to inflict reprisal on physicians as myself who are attempting to help patients through Covid-19 respond to the pandemic in terms of our patient care, our scholarship and our research, and also give patients a fair appraisal on a brand new set of experimental genetic vaccines which, for some patients, now represents a mortal threat to them. And we must have certainly a conversation about the risks and benefits.
So I think right now the most important thing that this committee can do, is this committee probably ought to have a working group on censorship and reprisal at the professional level. Doctors, nurses, patients, who under the watch of the HHS is actually incurring their constitutional rights being stripped away from free speech? What is going on in this state to actually impair medical progress?
Remember medical progress will not happen unless there is a roundtable discussion on something. What several speakers, a few minutes ago, he talked about a conversation between some doctors and a doctor who wanted to prescribe ivermectin. That conversation to me didn't seem to me didn't seem very fair balanced. It seemed like a disciplinary conversation. There is no disciplinary conversations in a brand new, novel corona virus. This is all about getting the patient better.
The other thing I heard in that conversation is a very, very important act of censorship or a violation of medical ethics. Dr. Bob Hall presented a case where a family member wanted the discussion about ivermectin of a patient in the hospital. There is a principle of medical ethics called shared decision making. When you're a patient in the hospital, you actually have a right to discuss what you want to have happen with your body. If you're taking a medicine as an outpatient, and you want to take that as an inpatient, that's called medication reconciliation. You have that full right to do so. No doctor can lord over you and say, no, you can't have that medication. If you've had a fair, balanced discussion, and drugs like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine are supported by hundreds and hundred of clinical trials. They're in dozens of government guidelines elsewhere in the world as first line therapy. Any American, any Texan, has the right to receive these drugs in the hospital when they engage in a discussion with their doctor. And under no circumstances should any doctor refuse a patient shared decision making and their own personal autonomy. It's unethical, it's immoral, and from a clinical perspective, it's illegal. And don't let it happen on your watch.
Those are my comments.
SENATOR LOIS KOLKHORST, CHAIR: Thank you, doctor. Senator Perry, I think had a—?
SENATOR CHARLES PERRY: So I guess it comes as some great shock and revelation to you, not many of my constituents sit around and ponder the latest published article from medical experts around the world or, you know, obviously the media is not your voice. So barring Texas having a CDC, someone on the ground here at the state level, their sole job is to basically do what you suggest we should be doing, I don't know that I disagree with you, it's almost impossible with the narrative that you get from media, the narrative you get from Congress, the narrative you get from CDC, so I don't know that there's anything we can do other than put somebody on that job, specifically. Can't be part-time legislators, right? We're not here. We hear things, we see things, we don't have the time to pursue it, so we need an expert, someone in your area, that the state puts a dog on it, so to speak, and stay on it.
But I'm going to ask the same question I think I asked Dr. Malone earlier. Is it just money?
I mean, clearly transparency or lack thereof has given way to a legitimate concern of trust and credibility with the people that used to, or at least we believed were best interest of public health. That's no longer the case. I think the [?] is correct.
Do you have an observation of why? Is it sheerly the money that's involved in the process? I mean, why are we as a nation slash world going down this path? Six— everybody needs to be vaccinated twice a year, you make that statement. Is it the money?
DR PETER McCULLOUGH: With no attention to potential harms.
SENATOR CHARLES PERRY: But is it the money? I mean, what is your honest assessment? I don't want a long—
DR PETER McCULLOUGH: I'm going to tell you. I had, I attended a scientific meeting in Washington, and the National Institutes of Health members were there, many of the people, Scott Atlas*, who was formerly in the White House was there, Martin Kulldorff*, Jay Bhattacharya* who's one of the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration*, myself, Marty Makary* from Johns Hopkins, and for the first time in a scientific meeting in my life, I'm at my fourth decade of doing this, I heard the word "evil."
Because it's worldwide, it's in the minds of people all over the world at the same time, from the very beginning of the pandemic, to do harm to other people. Whether it's committing euthanasia in the Netherlands, to denying treatment in Central Africa, to pharmacists in Texas not dispensing medications, the number of examples is endless, it's endless, and it's inexplicable. I don't know the answer. I've had that question from Tucker Carlson to Joe Rogan** and honestly, I wish I knew, about whatever it is, it's very, very bad.
SENATOR CHARLES PERRY: I believe it's true. I think it's just a sign of the times. But thank you.
SENATOR LOIS KOLKHORST, CHAIR: Thank you, Dr. McCullough. If there are no other questions, we want to thank you for now appearing before our committee twice. We heed your warnings. Thank you.
The field of medicine is permanently damaged.
People will never trust doctors. Ever again. Sorry, Dr. Alexander, not your fault, you are one of the good ones!
Murdered would be the word that comes to mind when discussing the above mentioned
What do you expect when the unholy alliance between the CDC and Darpa and the CIA have been in lock step to create bio weapons for over 50 years!
https://sensereceptornews.com/?p=15980 This is horrifying. Our very own DOD IS OUR ENEMY!
They did, we know, GOD knows, & they will NOT get away with their malfeasance !
Schwab is apparently sick. I can confirm that he supposedly took the vaccination. Let’s see how that shapes up. He was not attending the Davos/WEF opening ceremony.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/wef/schwab-soros-not-at-davos/
Trump, himself, is as guilty as all the rest.
He knew, He knows, and he still brags.
Don't trust the experts. They are the danger.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/one-case-study-proves-early-spread
The satanic democrats may yet prevent justice coming to the Covid psychopaths who lied 5 billion into taking their death shots. But final justice awaits the whole monstrous assembly.
Rev 21:8 "All liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death."
No time or patience for Congressional hearings. The are all corrupt in their commission or omission. McCarthy forced to challenge mandates a condition of his speakership. No time for more congressional theatre
Medical science has been headed to the dumpster for the last 4 decades. It finally surpassed pizza as the dominating occupant.
The list of media that a FOIA uncovered is attrocious, don't forget snapchat, and even tiny little papers on Maryville Tn. How many people did they help kill? God help them!
So many lives have been lost and destroyed because the truth had been censored. Crimes against humanity.
Eric Ding Dong dimwit blocked me from Twitter after I linked a study done on Chlorine Dioxide...which by the way was listed on FDA website as a study being conducted at that time.
Relatedly:
Dr. Peter A. McCullough Before the Texas State Senate, June 27, 2022
Pt 3: Censorship and Reprisal
https://metatron.substack.com/p/dr-peter-mccullough-testifies-before
PART THREE: PHYSICIAN CENSORSHIP AND REPRISAL
[PART ONE: EARLY TREATMENT ; PART TWO: THE COVID-19 VACCINES ]
TRANSCRIPT
13:10
DR. PETER McCULLOUGH: Final set of comments. Physician censorship and reprisal.
It is clear now that in the area of Covid that it's open season for censorship and reprisal, not just of physicians, but of nurses and patients and family members and others. And the censorship is because there is a global effort to mass vaccinate the population every six months. And anything that would deter from that is going to be censored.
So if a family member has lost a loved one after the vaccine, that event, if it's written somewhere, would have you censored.
We have widespread censorship in the medical literature now, in social media, and even in oral presentations.
I presented here on May 10th 2021. Five statements that I made here under oath are now subject of censorship and professional reprisal by the American Board of Internal Medicine. Every single statement I made just in my written remarks and my prepared remarks is cited.
The American Board of Internal Medicine, the Texas Medical Board, they don't have a monopoly on the truth.
No one holds medical truth. There are always two points of view on everything, or more.
And so Senator Johnson* has stepped in and called the American Board of Internal Medicine out to have a roundtable discussion on what's going on now is a giant sweep through the federation of medical boards through the American Board of Internal Medicine, American Board of Family Medicine, etcetera, and to have an open conversation. They have not responded, in fact they have doubled-down and said they're joining forces with the American Medical Association, again, in an effort to inflict reprisal on physicians as myself who are attempting to help patients through Covid-19 respond to the pandemic in terms of our patient care, our scholarship and our research, and also give patients a fair appraisal on a brand new set of experimental genetic vaccines which, for some patients, now represents a mortal threat to them. And we must have certainly a conversation about the risks and benefits.
So I think right now the most important thing that this committee can do, is this committee probably ought to have a working group on censorship and reprisal at the professional level. Doctors, nurses, patients, who under the watch of the HHS is actually incurring their constitutional rights being stripped away from free speech? What is going on in this state to actually impair medical progress?
Remember medical progress will not happen unless there is a roundtable discussion on something. What several speakers, a few minutes ago, he talked about a conversation between some doctors and a doctor who wanted to prescribe ivermectin. That conversation to me didn't seem to me didn't seem very fair balanced. It seemed like a disciplinary conversation. There is no disciplinary conversations in a brand new, novel corona virus. This is all about getting the patient better.
The other thing I heard in that conversation is a very, very important act of censorship or a violation of medical ethics. Dr. Bob Hall presented a case where a family member wanted the discussion about ivermectin of a patient in the hospital. There is a principle of medical ethics called shared decision making. When you're a patient in the hospital, you actually have a right to discuss what you want to have happen with your body. If you're taking a medicine as an outpatient, and you want to take that as an inpatient, that's called medication reconciliation. You have that full right to do so. No doctor can lord over you and say, no, you can't have that medication. If you've had a fair, balanced discussion, and drugs like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine are supported by hundreds and hundred of clinical trials. They're in dozens of government guidelines elsewhere in the world as first line therapy. Any American, any Texan, has the right to receive these drugs in the hospital when they engage in a discussion with their doctor. And under no circumstances should any doctor refuse a patient shared decision making and their own personal autonomy. It's unethical, it's immoral, and from a clinical perspective, it's illegal. And don't let it happen on your watch.
Those are my comments.
SENATOR LOIS KOLKHORST, CHAIR: Thank you, doctor. Senator Perry, I think had a—?
SENATOR CHARLES PERRY: So I guess it comes as some great shock and revelation to you, not many of my constituents sit around and ponder the latest published article from medical experts around the world or, you know, obviously the media is not your voice. So barring Texas having a CDC, someone on the ground here at the state level, their sole job is to basically do what you suggest we should be doing, I don't know that I disagree with you, it's almost impossible with the narrative that you get from media, the narrative you get from Congress, the narrative you get from CDC, so I don't know that there's anything we can do other than put somebody on that job, specifically. Can't be part-time legislators, right? We're not here. We hear things, we see things, we don't have the time to pursue it, so we need an expert, someone in your area, that the state puts a dog on it, so to speak, and stay on it.
But I'm going to ask the same question I think I asked Dr. Malone earlier. Is it just money?
I mean, clearly transparency or lack thereof has given way to a legitimate concern of trust and credibility with the people that used to, or at least we believed were best interest of public health. That's no longer the case. I think the [?] is correct.
Do you have an observation of why? Is it sheerly the money that's involved in the process? I mean, why are we as a nation slash world going down this path? Six— everybody needs to be vaccinated twice a year, you make that statement. Is it the money?
DR PETER McCULLOUGH: With no attention to potential harms.
SENATOR CHARLES PERRY: But is it the money? I mean, what is your honest assessment? I don't want a long—
DR PETER McCULLOUGH: I'm going to tell you. I had, I attended a scientific meeting in Washington, and the National Institutes of Health members were there, many of the people, Scott Atlas*, who was formerly in the White House was there, Martin Kulldorff*, Jay Bhattacharya* who's one of the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration*, myself, Marty Makary* from Johns Hopkins, and for the first time in a scientific meeting in my life, I'm at my fourth decade of doing this, I heard the word "evil."
Because it's worldwide, it's in the minds of people all over the world at the same time, from the very beginning of the pandemic, to do harm to other people. Whether it's committing euthanasia in the Netherlands, to denying treatment in Central Africa, to pharmacists in Texas not dispensing medications, the number of examples is endless, it's endless, and it's inexplicable. I don't know the answer. I've had that question from Tucker Carlson to Joe Rogan** and honestly, I wish I knew, about whatever it is, it's very, very bad.
SENATOR CHARLES PERRY: I believe it's true. I think it's just a sign of the times. But thank you.
SENATOR LOIS KOLKHORST, CHAIR: Thank you, Dr. McCullough. If there are no other questions, we want to thank you for now appearing before our committee twice. We heed your warnings. Thank you.
21:11
Say no to all of the evil ones' plan in 2023, yes they killed and maimed many, now it needs to ed.
Never Again!